Skip to main content

Ballot Regulations and Multiparty Politics in the States

  • Barry C. Burden (a1)

American politics is dominated by two major parties and has been for a century. The duopoly enjoyed by the Democrats and Republicans is largely the result of Duverger's Law: the tendency of a single-member district system to produce two-party competition (Duverger 1963). Minor parties ultimately fail in a single-member district system because (1) the winner-take-all approach does not reward candidates who finish third and (2) citizens vote strategically to avoid “wasting” their votes on hopeless candidates and spoiling the election (Cox 1997; Riker 1982). Because the U.S. two-party system is so dependent on its majoritarian electoral rules, one might suspect that other election regulations would have little effect on the number of parties.A longer version of this paper was presented at the conference, “2008 and Beyond: The Future of Election and Ethics Reform in the States,” Columbus, OH, January 16–17, 2007. I thank Richard Winger of Ballot Access News for comments and information.

Hide All


Allen, Neal, and Brian J. Brox. 2005. “The Roots of Third Party Voting: The 2000 Nader Campaign in Historical Perspective.” Party Politics 5: 62337.
Argersinger, Peter H. 1980. “‘A Place on the Ballot’: Fusion Politics and Antifusion Laws.” American Historical Review 85: 287306.
Burden, Barry C. 2005. “Minor Parties and Strategic Voting in Recent U.S. Presidential Elections.” Electoral Studies 24: 60318.
Collett, Christian, and Martin P. Wattenberg. 1999. “Strategically Unambitious: Minor Party and Independent Candidates in the 1996 Congressional Elections.” In The State of the Parties, 3rd ed., eds. John C. Green and Daniel M. Shea. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Cox, Gary W. 1997. Making Votes Count. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Disch, Lisa J. 2002. The Tyranny of the Two-Party System. New York: Columbia University Press.
Duverger, Maurice. 1963. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. Trans. B. North and R. North. New York: Wiley.
Hirano, Shigeo, and James M. Snyder Jr. 2007. “The Decline of Third Party Voting in the United States.” Journal of Politics 69 (1): 116.
Lentz, Jacob. 2002. Electing Jesse Ventura: A Third-Party Success Story. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Lewis-Beck, Michael S., and Peverill Squire. 1995. “The Politics of Institutional Choice: Presidential Ballot Access for Third Parties in the United States.” British Journal of Political Science 25: 41927.
Lowi, Theodore J. 1999. “Toward a More Responsible Three-Party System: Plan or Obituary?” In The State of the Parties, 3rd ed., eds. John C. Green and Daniel M. Shea. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Morse, Adam, and J. J. Gass. 2006. “More Choices, More Voices: A Primer on Fusion.” Brennan Center for Justice. Available at:
Reed, Steven R. 1990. “Structure and Behavior: Extending Duverger's Law to the Japanese Case.” British Journal of Political Science 20: 33556.
Riker, William H. 1982. “The Two-Party System and Duverger's Law: An Essay on the History of Political Science.” American Political Science Review 76: 75366.
Rosenstone, Steven J., Roy L. Behr, and Edward H. Lazarus. 1996. Third Parties in America, 2nd ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Scarrow, Howard A. 1986. “Duverger's Law, Fusion, and the Decline of American ‘Third’ Parties.” Western Political Quarterly 39: 63447.
Strattman, Thomas. 2005. “Ballot Access Restrictions and Candidate Entry in Elections.” European Journal of Political Economy 21: 5971.
Tamas, Bernard Ivan, and Matthew Dean Hindman. 2007. “Do State Election Laws Really Hurt Third-Parties? Ballot Access, Fusion, and Elections to the U.S. House of Representatives.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.
Winger, Richard. 1997. “Institutional Obstacles to a Multiparty System.” In Multiparty Politics in America, eds. Paul S. Herrnson and John C. Green. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield.
Winger, Richard. 2006. “How Many Parties Ought to be on the Ballot? An Analysis of Nader v. Keith.” Election Law Journal 5: 170200.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 4
Total number of PDF views: 33 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 228 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.