Skip to main content

Blogs, Online Seminars, and Social Media as Tools of Scholarship in Political Science

  • Justin Esarey (a1) and Andrew R. Wood (a1)

How do political scientists use online tools as part of their scholarly work? Are there systematic differences in how they value these tools by field, gender, or other demographics? How important are these tools relative to traditional practices of political scientists? The answers to these questions will shape how our discipline chooses to reward academics who engage with “new media” such as blogs, online seminars (i.e., webinars), Twitter, and Facebook. We find that traditional tools of scholarship are more highly regarded and used more often than any new media, although blogs are considered most important among new media. However, we also find evidence that these webinars are used and valued at rates comparable to traditional tools when they are provided in ways that meet political scientists’ needs. Finally, we observe that women and graduate students are substantially more likely than men and tenure-track academics to report that webinars and online videos are important sources of new ideas and findings.

Hide All
Acord, Sophia Krzys, and Harley, Diane. 2012. “Credit, Time, and Personality: The Human Challenges to Sharing Scholarly Work Using Web 2.0.” New Media and Society 15 (3): 379–97.
Carpenter, Charli, and Drezner, Daniel W.. 2010. “International Relations 2.0: The Implications of New Media for an Old Profession.” International Studies Perspectives 11 (3): 255–72.
Dawson, Michael, and Rascoff, Matthew. 2006. “Scholarly Communications in the Economics Discipline: A Report Commissioned by JSTOR.” Available at Accessed August 18, 2016.
Esposito, Antonella. 2013. “Neither Digital or Open. Just Researchers: Views on Digital/Open Scholarship Practices in an Italian University.” First Monday 18 (1): 120.
Farley, Robert. 2013. “Complicating the Political Scientist as Blogger.” PS: Political Science & Politics 46 (2): 383–6.
Farrell, Henry, and Drezner, Daniel W.. 2008. “The Power and Politics of Blogs.” Public Choice 134 (1/2): 1530.
Farrell, Henry, and Sides, John. 2010. “Building a Political Science Public Sphere with Blogs.” The Forum 8 (3): Article 10.
GoToWebinar. 2016. “Performance Report.” Available at Accessed August 10, 2016.
Gruzd, Anatoliy, and Goertzen, Melissa. 2013. “Wired Academia: Why Social Science Scholars Are Using Social Media.” In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Available at Accessed August 18, 2016.
Gruzd, Anatoliy, Staves, Kathleen, and Wilk, Amanda. 2012. “Connected Scholars: Examining the Role of Social Media in Research Practices of Faculty Using the UTAUT Model.” Computers in Human Behavior 28 (6): 2340–50.
International Methods Colloquium. 2016. “About the IMC.” Available at!about2/cq8t. Accessed August 10, 2016.
Klunk, Brian. 2012. “Does It Matter If Political Scientists Publish Great Blogs?” Available at Accessed August 14, 2016.
Leeper, Thomas J. 2013. “Making High-Resolution Graphics for Academic Publishing.” The Political Methodologist 21 (1): 25. Available at Accessed August 18, 2016.
Lynch, Marc. 2016. “Political Science in Real Time: Engaging the Middle East Policy Public.” Perspectives on Politics 14 (1): 121–31.
Maron, Nancy L., and Kirby Smith, K.. 2008. “Current Models of Digital Scholarly Communication: Results of an Investigation Conducted by Ithaka for the Association of Research Libraries.” Association of Research Libraries. Available at Accessed August 16, 2016.
McKenna, Laura. 2007. “‘Getting the Word Out’: Policy Bloggers Use Their Soap Box to Make Change.” Review of Policy Research 24 (3): 209–29.
Nyhan, Brendan, Sides, John, and Tucker, Joshua A.. 2015. “APSA as Amplifier: How to Encourage and Promote Public Voices within Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (S1): 9093.
Papalexi, Marina, Cheng, Siu Yee, Dehe, Benjamin, and Bamford, David. 2014. “The Use of Social Media and its Potential in the Research Lifecycle.” Presented at the European Operations Management Association (EurOMA) Conference, June 20–25.
Ponte, Diego, and Simon, Judith. 2011. “Scholarly Communication 2.0: Exploring Researchers’ Opinions on Web 2.0 for Scientific Knowledge Creation, Evaluation, and Dissemination.” Serials Review 37 (3): 149–56.
Procter, Rob, Williams, Robin, Stewart, James, Poschen, Meik, Snee, Helene, Voss, Alex, and Targhi-Asgari, Marzieh. 2010. “Adoption and Use of Web 2.0 in Scholarly Communications.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Series A 368 (1926): 4039–56.
Rowlands, Ian, Nicholas, David, Russell, Bill, Canty, Nicholas, and Watkinson, Anthony. 2011. “Social Media Use in the Research Workflow.” Learned Publishing 24 (3): 183–95.
Sides, John. 2011. “The Political Scientist as Blogger.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (2): 267–71.
Sjoberg, Laura. 2013. “Feminist IR 101: Teaching Through Blogs.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (4): 383–93.
Venables, William N., and Ripley, Brian D.. 2002. Modern Applied Statistics with S. Fourth edition. New York: Springer. ISBN 0-387-95457-0. Available at
Walt, Stephen M. 2010. “What to Do on Your Summer Vacation.” Foreign Policy (December 10). Available at Accessed August 14, 2016. 2016. “Support: Stats.” Available at Accessed August 10, 2016.
YouTube. 2016a. “YouTube Analytics Basics.” Available at Accessed August 10, 2016.
YouTube. 2016b. “YouTube Creator Studio App Basics.” Available at Accessed August 10, 2016.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Esarey and Wood supplementary material 1
Online Appendix

 PDF (244 KB)
244 KB


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed