Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Civic Tech For Urban Collaborative Governance

  • Hollie Russon Gilman (a1)
Abstract
Copyright
References
Hide All
Agranoff, Robert. 2006. “Inside Collaborative Networks: Ten Lessons for Public Managers.” Public Administration Review 66 (Supplement s1): 5665.
Ansell, Chris and Gash, Alison. 2007. “Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 18 (4): 543–71. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032
Bryson, John M., Crosby, Barbara, and Stone, Melissa Middleton. 2006. “The Design and Implementation of Cross-Sector Collaborations: Proposition from the Literature.” Public Administration Review 66 (Supp. 1).
Cooper, Terry L., Bryer, Thomas A., and Meek, Jack W.. 2006. “Citizen-Centered Collaborative Public Management.” Public Administration Review 66: 7688.
Cooper, Terry L., Bryer, Thomas A., and Meek, Jack W.. 2008. “Outcomes Achieved through Citizen-Centered Collaborative Public Management.” In Big Ideas in Collaborative Public Management, eds. Bingham, Lisa Blomgren and O’Leary, Rosemary, 221–29. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Crawford, Susan and Walters, Dana. 2013. “Citizen-Centered Governance: The Mayor’s Office of New Urban Mechanics and The Evolution of CRM in Boston Case Study.” Harvard Data-Smart City Solutions.
Davies, Rodrigo. 2014. Civic Crowdfunding: Participatory Communities, Entrepreneurs, and the Political Economy of Place. (Unpublished master’s thesis). MIT, Cambridge, MA. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2434615
Evers, Adalbert and Ewert, Benjamin. 2015. “Social Innovation for Social Cohesion.” In New Frontiers in Social Innovation Research, eds. Nicholis, Alex, Simon, Julie, and Gabriel, Madeline. UK: Palgrave and Macmillan.
Frederickson, George H. 1982. “The Recovery of Civism in Public Administration.” Public Administration Review 42 (6): 501–08.
Fung, Archon. 2015. “Putting the Public Back into Governance: The Challenges of Citizen Participation and its Future.” Public Administration Review 75 (4): 513–22. doi: 10.1111/puar.12361.
Fung, Archon, Russon Gilman, Hollie, and Shkabatur, Jennifer. 2013. “Six Models for the Internet + Politics.” International Studies Review 15 (1): 2047. doi: 10.1111/misr.12028
Gilman, Hollie Russon and Gover, Jessica. 2016. Architecture of Innovation: Institutionalizing Innovation in Federal Policy Making. Georgetown University.
Katz, Bruce and Wagner, Julie. 2014. “The Rise of Innovation Districts: A New Geography of Innovation in America.” Brookings Institution.
Kettl, Donald. 2015. “The Job of Government: Interweaving Public Functions and Private Hands.” Public Administration Review 75 (2): 219–29.
Knight Foundation. 2012. “Digital Citizenship: Exploring the Field of Tech for Engagement.” Miami, FL. Retrieved from: http://www.slideshare.net/knightfoundation/knight-civictech
McCann, Laurenellen. 2015. Experimental Modes of Civic Engagement in Civic Tech. Smart Chicago Collaborative.
Moore, Mark. 1995. Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Moore, Mark. 2007. Creating Public Value: Strategic Management in Government. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Moore, Mark. 2013. Recognizing Public Value. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Moore, Mark and Hartley, Jean. 2008. “Innovative in Governance.” Public Management Review 10 (1): 320.
Nabatchi, Tina. 2010. “Addressing the Citizenship and Democratic Deficits: Exploring the Potential of Deliberative Democracy for Public Administration.” American Review of Public Administration 40 (4): 376–99.
Noveck, Beth Simone. 2015. Smart Citizens, Smarter State: The Technologies of Expertise and the Future of Governing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reddick, Christopher G. 2011. “Information Technology and Emergency Management: Preparedness and Planning in US States.” Disasters 35 (1): 4561.
Reddick, Christopher G. and Norris, Donald F.. 2013. “Social Media Adoption at the American Grass Roots: Web 2.0 or 1.5? Government Information Quarterly 30 (4): 498507.
Rumbul, Rebecca. 2015. “Who Benefits from Civic Technology? Demographic and Public Attitudes Research into the Users of Civic Technologies.” UK: mySociety.
Sirianni, Carmen. 2006. Reinvesting in Democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Sørensen, Eva and Torfing, Jacob. 2011. “Enhancing Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector. Administration and Society 43 (8): 842–68.
Touchton, Michael and Wampler, Brian. 2014. “Improving Social Well-Being through New Democratic Institutions.” Comparative Political Studies 47 (10): 1442–69. doi:10.1177/0010414013512601.
Thornton, Sean. 2013. “Chicago’s Windy Grid: Taking Situational Awareness to a New Level” Data-Smart City Solutions. June 13. Retrieved from http://datasmart.ash.harvard.edu/news/article/chicagos-windygrid-taking-situational-awareness-to-a-new-level-259
Thornton, Sean. 2016. “Chicago Launches OpenGrid to Democratize Open Data.” Harvard Data-Smart City Solutions, January 20. Retrieved from http://datasmart.ash.harvard.edu/news/article/chicago-launches-opengrid-to-democratize-open-data-778.
Trippi, Joe. 2004. The Revolution Will Not be Televised: Democracy, the Internet, and the Overthrow of Everything. New York, NY: HarperCollins.
Zavattaro, Staci M., Edward French, P., and Mohanty, Somya D.. 2015. “A Sentiment Analysis of U.S. Local Government Tweets: The Connection Between Tone and Citizen Involvement.” Government Information Quarterly 32 (3): 333–41.
Yang, Kaifeng. 2005. “Public Administrators’ Trust in Citizens: A Missing Link in Citizen Involvement Efforts.” Public Administration Review 65 (3): 273–85.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed