Skip to main content Accessibility help

Conditional Arbiters: The Limits of Political Party Influence in Presidential Nominations

  • Wayne P. Steger (a1)


The 2016 Republican presidential nomination challenges arguments about political party insiders’ influence on the outcome. This article argues, first, that party insider influence is conditional on the participation, coalescence, and timing of party stakeholders behind a front-runner during the invisible primary, and second, that party insider influence has probably declined since the 2000 presidential election. Data on endorsements by elite elected officials in open presidential nominations from 1984 to 2016 show that party insiders’ participation and convergence of support behind the front-runner is less extensive than what was found by Cohen, Karol, Noel, and Zaller (2008), though the data sets differ. Party insiders participate and unify more readily when the party coalition is stable and there is a candidate in the race who has demonstrable national support. Party elites remain on the sidelines when the party coalition is divided or when there is uncertainty about the appeal of candidates (Ryan 2011; Whitby 2014). The potency of insider endorsements likely has declined with the rise of social media, the changing campaign finance landscape, and the reemergence of populism in each party.



Hide All
Abramowitz, Alan I. 1989. “Viability, Electability, and Candidate Choice in a Primary Election: a Test of Competing Models.” Journal of Politics 51 (4): 977–92.
Aldrich, John. 1980. Before the Convention: Strategies and Choices in Presidential Nominations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Anderson, Christopher L. 2013. “Which Party Elites Choose to Lead the Nomination Process.” Political Research Quarterly 66 (1): 6176.
Azaria, Julie. 2016. “A for Effort: Republican Elites Tried to Coordinate but Never Quite Got There.” May 19.
Bartels, Larry. 1988. Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Bawn, Kathleen, Cohen, Martin, Karol, David, Masket, Seth, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John. 2012. “A Theory of Parties: Groups, Policy Demanders and Nominations in American Politics.” Perspectives on Politics 10 (3): 571–97.
Butler, Richard. L. 2004. Claiming the Mantle: How Presidential Nominations are Won and Lost Before the Votes are Cast. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Cohen, Marty, Karol, David, Noel, Hans, and Zaller, John, 2008. The Party Decides: Presidential Nominations Before and After Reform. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dowdle, Andrew J., Limbocker, Scott, Yang, Song, and Sebold, Karen. 2013. The Invisible Hands of Political Parties in Presidential Elections: Party Activists and Political Aggregation from 2004 to 2012. New York: Palgrave Pivot.
Gidron, Noam and Bonikowski, Bart. 2013. Varieties of Populism. Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Working Paper Series. No. 13-0004. Harvard University.
Haynes, Audrey A., Gurian, Paul-Henri, Crespin, Michael H., and Zorn, Christopher. 2004. “The Calculus of Concession: Media Coverage and the Dynamics of Winnowing in Presidential Nominations.” Political Research Quarterly 64 (4): 87–83.
Keech, William R. and Mathews, Donald R.. 1976. The Party’s Choice. Washington DC: Brookings Institute.
Kenney, Patrick J. 1993. “An Examination of How Voters Form Impressions of Candidates’ Issue Positions During the Nomination Campaign.” Political Behavior 315 (2): 265–88.
Kolowich, Steve. 2016. “The Life of ‘The Party Decides’: 4 political-science professors contemplate the improbable rise and fall of an obscure academic text in the time of Trump.” May 16.
Masket, Seth. 2016. “A Strong Field Does Not Make for a Strong Nominee.” May 24.
Mitchell, Joshua L., Sebold, Karen, Dowdle, Andrew, Limbocker, Scott, and Stewart, Patrick A.. 2015. The Political Geography of Campaign Finance: Fundraising and Contribution Patterns in Presidential Elections. New York. Palgrave MacMillan.
Noel, Hans. 2016. “Why Can’t the GOP Stop Trump.” New York Times, March 1.
Norrander, Barbara. 1993. Nomination Choices: Caucus and Primary Outcomes, 1976-88. American Journal of Political Science 37 (2): 343–64.
Norrander, Barbara. 2006. “The Attrition Game: Initial Resources, Initial Contests and the Exit of Candidates During the US Presidential Primary Season.” British Journal of Political Science 36: 487507.
Olsen, Henry and Scala, Dante J.. 2015. The Four Faces of the Republican Party and the Fight for the 2016 Presidential Nomination. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Paulson, Arthur. 2007. Electoral Realignment and the Outlook for American Democracy, Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Ryan, Josh M. 2011. “Is the Democratic Party’s Superdelegate System Unfair to Voters? Electoral Studies 30: 756770.
Sheffield, Matthew. 2016. “The Party Can No Longer Decide.” March 10.
Silver, Nate. 2016. “The Republican Party May Be Failing: What ‘The Party Decides’ Could Get Wrong about Donald Trump and the GOP.” January 25.
Steger, Wayne. 2000. “Do Primary Voters Draw from a Stacked Deck? Presidential Nominations in an Era of Candidate-Centered Campaigns.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 30 (4): 727–53.
Steger, Wayne. 2008. “Inter-Party Differences in Elite Support for Presidential Nomination Candidates.” American Politics Research 36 (4): 724–49.
Steger, Wayne. 2013. “Two Paradigms of Presidential Nominations.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 43 (2): 377387.
Steger, Wayne. 2015. A Citizen’s Guide to Presidential Nominations: the Competition for Leadership. New York: Routledge Press.
Whitby, Kenny J. 2014. Strategic Decision Making in Presidential Nominations: When and Why Party Elites Decide to Support a Candidate. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

Conditional Arbiters: The Limits of Political Party Influence in Presidential Nominations

  • Wayne P. Steger (a1)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.