Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-r6qrq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:08:57.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cultural Issues and Images in the 1988 Presidential Campaign: Why the Democrats Lost—Again!

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Joel Lieske
Joel Lieske*
Affiliation:
Cleveland State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

How do you explain the outcomes of modern presidential elections? This is the central dilemma of American politics. Why, for instance, did the Democrats, the so-called majority party, lose again in 1988? And why have they gone down to defeat in five of the last six presidential elections? Curiously, there appears to be no dearth of answers to these questions.

Many pundits, such as neoconservative William Schneider (1988), have argued that the Democrats are too liberal to win a national election. Others maintain that presidential elections are retrospective referenda on the economy and peace issues. According to this view, the incumbent party never loses when times are prosperous and the nation is at peace. Still others argue that presidential elections are actually beauty contests in which voters select the candidate who demonstrates the most attractive combination of personality traits, leadership qualities, and political credentials (Miller, Wattenberg, and Malanchuk 1986). Yet others contend that most losing Democratic candidates have run notoriously inept campaigns. In the Yiddish vernacular, Dukakis was a “Putz.” Finally, some analysts (Burns, Peltason, and Cronin 1989: 276–77) try to please everyone by advancing umbrella explanations that include all of these arguments.

Unfortunately, none of these explanations, taken individually, is particularly persuasive. And most appear to be little more than post hoc rationalizations. Of course, when something cannot be fully understood, we are prone to make fun of our ignorance.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 1991 , pp. 180 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burns, James MacGregor, Peltason, J. W., and Cronin, Thomas E. 1989. Government by the People, 13th alternate edition. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Carmines, Edward G. and Stimson, James A. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, Edward G. and Stimson, James A. 1980. “The Two Faces of Issue Voting.” American Political Science Review 74: 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conover, Pamela Johnston and Feldman, Stanley. 1981. “The Origins and Meaning of Liberal/Conservative Self-Identifications.” American Journal of Political Science 25: 617–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elazar, Daniel J. 1970. Cities of the Prairie. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Elazar, Daniel J. 1984. American Federalism, 3rd edition. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert. 1989. “Why the Democrats Lose Presidential Elections: Toward a Theory of Optimal Loss (with Apologies to A. Wuffle).” PS: Political Science & Politics 22 (March): 30–5.Google Scholar
Erikson, Robert. 1988. “Economic Conditions and the Presidential Vote.” American Political Science Review 83: 567–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert., Luttbeg, Norman, and Tedin, Kent. 1988. American Public Opinion, 3rd edition. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Garreau, Joel. 1981. The Nine Nations of North America. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Gastil, Raymond D. 1975. Cultural Regions of the United States. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Glenmary Research Center. 1982. Church and Church Membership in the United States, 1980. Atlanta, GA.Google Scholar
Joslyn, Richard A. 1980. “Manifestations of Elazar's Political Subcultures: State Public Opinion and the Content of Political Campaign Advertising.” Publius 10: 37–58.Google Scholar
Joslyn, Richard A. 1984. Mass Media and Elections. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Kelley, Robert. 1979. The Cultural Pattern in American Politics. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Kleppner, Paul. 1970. The Cross of Culture: A Social Analysis of Midwestern Politics, 1850–1900. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Leege, David C., Lieske, Joel A., and Wald, Kenneth D. 1990. “Toward Cultural Theories of American Political Behavior.” In Crotty, William, ed., Political Science: Looking to the Future. Chicago: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Lieske, Joel. 1988a. “The Cultural Origins of Political Partisanship.” Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the Western Political Science Association, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Lieske, Joel. 1988b. “The Cultural Nexus in U.S. Presidential Elections.” Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Lieske, Joel. 1989. “Subcultural Differences in the U.S. Presidential Vote.” Paper delivered at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta.Google Scholar
Miller, Arthur H., Wattenberg, Martin P., and Malanchuk, Oksana. 1986. “Schematic Assessments of Presidential Candidates.” American Political Science Review 80: 521–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New York Times/CBS News Poll. 1988. “Portrait of the Electorate.” New York Times (November 10): 18.Google Scholar
Opinion Roundup. 1988. “George Bush and Michael Dukakis: How They Stand in National and Regional Polls.” Public Opinion (Sept./Oct.): 36–7.Google Scholar
Orren, Gary R. and Polsby, Nelson W. 1987. Media and Momentum. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.Google Scholar
Peirce, Neal R. and Hagstrom, Jerry. 1984. The Book of America: Inside Fifty States Today. New York: Warner.Google Scholar
Reed, John Shelton. 1974. “Summertime and the Livin' Is Easy: The Quality of Life in the South,” University of North Carolina Newsletter. Chapel Hill, NC: Institute for Research in Social Science.Google Scholar
Robbins, Jonathan. 1989. “Geodemographics: The New Magic.” In Sabato, Larry, ed., Campaigns and Elections. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.Google Scholar
Schneider, William. 1989. “An Insider's View of the Election.” The Atlantic 262 (July): 29–57.Google Scholar
Sigelman, Lee. 1989. “The 1988 Presidential Nominations: Whatever Happened to Momentum.” PS: Political Science & Politics 22 (March): 35–9.Google Scholar
Sigelman, Lee. 1990. “Toward a Stupidity-Ugliness Theory of Democratic Electoral Debacles.” PS: Political Science & Politics 23 (March): 18–20.Google Scholar
Wald, Kenneth D. 1987. Religion and Politics in the United States. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, Michael J. 1988. The Clustering of America. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Williams, Lena. 1990. “Ambition and Pride in Names of the 80s.” New York Times (January 10): 17.Google Scholar