Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Data, Methods, and Theoretical Implications

  • Rebecca J. Hannagan (a1), Monica C. Schneider (a2) and Jill S. Greenlee (a3)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1049096512000030
  • Published online: 14 March 2012
Abstract

Within the subfields of political psychology and the study of gender, the introduction of new data collection efforts, methodologies, and theoretical approaches are transforming our understandings of these two fields and the places at which they intersect. In this article we present an overview of the research that was presented at a National Science Foundation (NSF) (#SES-1014854) funded conference “New Research on Gender in Political Psychology” at Rutgers University in March 2011. This scholarship represents the expanding questions and approaches that enhance our understanding of gender within political psychology. As a result, we suggest that further innovation is needed with regard to theory and methods to understand better how gender shapes the political attitudes and actions of individuals. Our discussion here covers the use of data, interdisciplinary methods, and intersectionality to study gender. We conclude with thoughts about the theoretical implications of this recent scholarship and the future of political science research on gender.

Copyright
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Edith J. Barrett 1995. “The Policy Priorities of African American Women in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 20 (2): 223–47.

Edith J. Barrett 1997. “Gender and Race in the State House: The Legislative ExperienceThe Social Science Journal 34 (2): 131–44.

Deborah Jordan Brooks . 2011b. “Testing the Double Standard for Candidate Emotionality: Voter Reactions to the Tears and Anger of Male and Female Politicians. The Journal of Politics 73 (2): 597615.

Pamela Johnston Conover , and Barbara Hicks . 1998. “The Psychology of Overlapping Identities: Ethnic, Citizen, Nation and Beyond.” In National Identities and Ethnic Minorities in Eastern Europe, ed. Ray Taras . 1148. New York: MacMillan Press.

Kimberle Crenshaw . 1991. “Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color.” Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241–99.

Lauren Duncan , and Abigail J. Stewart . 2007. “Personal Political Salience: The Role of Personality in Collective Identity and Action.” Political Psychology 28: 143–64.

Alice H. Eagly , Amanda Diekman , Mary Johannesen-Schmidt , and Anne Koenig . 2004. “Gender Gaps in Sociopolitical Attitudes: A Social Psychological Analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 87 (6): 796816.

Laurel Elder , and Steven Greene . 2007. “The Myth of ‘Security Moms’ and ‘NASCAR Dads’: Parenthood, Political Stereotypes, and the 2004 Election.” Social Science Quarterly 88 (1): 119.

Claudine Gay , and Katherine Tate . 1998. “Doubly Bound: The Impact of Gender and Race on the Politics of Black Women.” Political Psychology 19 (1): 169–84.

Donald P. Green , Alan S. Gerber , and David W. Nickerson . 2003. “Getting Out the Vote in Local Elections: Results from Six Door-to-Door Canvassing Experiments.” The Journal of Politics 65 (4): 1083–96.

Rebecca J. Hannagan 2008. “Gendered Political Behavior: A Darwinian Feminist Approach.” Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 59: 465–75.

Rebecca J. Hannagan , and Christopher W. Larimer . 2010. “Does Gender Composition Affect Group Decision Outcomes? Evidence from a Laboratory Experiment.” Political Behavior 32 (1): 5167.

Susan E. Howell , and Christine L. Day . 2000. “Complexities of the Gender Gap.” The Journal of Politics 62 (3): 858–74.

Leonie Huddy , and Theresa Capelos . 2002. “Gender Stereotyping and Candidate Evaluation.” In The Social Psychology of Politics, ed. Victor C. Ottati , Emil J. Posavac , John Edwards , Fred B. Bryant , R. Scott Tindale , Daniel C. O'Connell , Linda Heath , and Yolanda Suarez-Balcazar . 2953. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.

Leonie Huddy , and Nadya Terkildsen . 1993a. “The Consequences of Gender Stereotyping for Women Candidates at Different Levels and Types of Office.” Political Research Quarterly 46: 503–25.

Leonie Huddy , and Nadya Terkildsen . 1993b. “Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates.” American Journal of Political Science 37: 119–47.

Virginia Sapiro . 1981. “If U.S. Senator Baker Were A Woman: An Experimental Study of Candidate Images.” Political Psychology 3: 6183.

Donald O. Sears 1986. “College Sophomores in the Laboratory: Influences of a Narrow Data Base on Social Psychology's View of Human Nature.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 (3): 515–30.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×