Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T19:19:22.765Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Deconstructing the 2004 Presidential Election Forecasts: The Fiscal Model and the Campbell Collection Compared

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2005

Alfred G. Cuzán  and
Charles M. Bundrick
Alfred G. Cuzán
Affiliation:
The University of West Florida
Charles M. Bundrick
Affiliation:
The University of West Florida
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In this paper we compare the August 1st forecast of the 2004 presidential election generated with the fiscal model with those made with the seven models of what we call the “Campbell Collection,” after James E. Campbell, the editor or co-editor of several forecasting symposia that have appeared in the American Politics Quarterly (October, 1996) and in successive issues of PS: Political Science and Politics (October, 2004 and January, 2005). For reasons that will become evident, Ray Fair's “presidential vote equation” (Fair 2002a, 2002b) is also included in the comparison. First, given space constraints, we present only a brief summary of the theoretical model. (For a more extended discussion, interested readers are encouraged to pursue the relevant references.) Then, as we did pursuant to issuing a forecast for the 2004 election, we estimate the model over the 22 elections held between 1916 and 2000, showing the out-of-sample results. Finally, we evaluate the model relative to the Campbell Collection on operational and substantive criteria.

Type
Features
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 38 , Issue 2 , April 2005 , pp. 255 - 262
Copyright
© 2005 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz Alan I. 2004. “When Good Forecasts Go Bad: The Time-for-Change Model and the 2004 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics 37 (October): 745– 746.Google Scholar
Alesina Alberto, and Howard Rosenthal. 1995. Partisan Politics, Divided Government, and the Economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Armstrong J. Scott. 2003. “Review of Predicting Presidential Elections and Other Things, by Ray C. Fair.” International Journal of Forecasting 19: 760– 761.Google Scholar
Ashby W. Ross. 1970. “Analysis of the System to be Modeled.” In The Process of Model Building in the Behavioral Sciences, eds. Ross W. Ashby et al. Ohio State University Press, 94– 114.Google Scholar
Black Duncan. 1950. “The Unity of Political and Economic Science.” Economic Journal 60: 506– 514.Google Scholar
Campbell James E. 2005. “Introduction-Assessments of the 2004 Presidential Vote Forecasts.” PS: Political Science and Politics 38 (January): 35– 36.Google Scholar
Campbell James E. 2004a. “Forecasting the Presidential Vote in 2004: Placing Preference Polls in Context.” PS: Political Science and Politics 37 (October): 763– 768.Google Scholar
Campbell James E. 2004b. “Introduction—The 2004 Presidential Elections Forecasts.” PS: Political Science and Politics 37 (October): 733– 735.Google Scholar
Cuzán Alfred G., and Charles M. Bundrick. 2004. “Fiscal Effects on Presidential Elections: A Forecast for 2004.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Cuzán Alfred G., and Charles M. Bundrick. 2003. “Fiscal Policy: A Missing Factor in Ray Fair's Presidential Elections Forecasting Model?” Available at www.uwf.edu/govt/facultyforums/fiscalasfactorinfair4draft.pdf.Google Scholar
Cuzán Alfred G., and Charles M. Bundrick. 2000. “Fiscal Policy and Presidential Elections: Update and Extension.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 30 (2): 275– 289.Google Scholar
Cuzán Alfred G., and Richard J. Heggen. 1984. “A Fiscal Model of Presidential Elections in the United States, 1880–1980.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 14 (1): 98– 108.Google Scholar
Cuzán Alfred G., Richard J. Heggen, and Charles M. Bundrick. 2003. Voters and Presidents: A Fiscal Model. Philadelphia: Xlibris. Available at www.uwf.edu/govt/ facultyforums/15731-CUZA-layoutlow[1].pdfGoogle Scholar
Downs Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
DeHaven Ted. 2004. “Blowing It.” National Review, April 5, 37– 39.Google Scholar
de Rugy Veronique, and Tad DeHaven. 2003. “On Spending, Bush Is No Reagan.” Tax and Budget Bulletin, No. 16, August. Cato Institute.Google Scholar
Erikson Robert S., Michael B. MacKuen, and James A. Stimson. 2001. The Macro Polity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fair Ray. 2002a. Predicting Presidential Elections and Other Things. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fair Ray. 2002b. “The Effect of Economic Events on Votes for President: 2000 Update.” Available at: http://fairmodel.econ. yale.edu/RAYFAIR/PDF/2002DHTM.HTM.Google Scholar
Garand James C., and James E. Campbell, eds. 1996. “Special Issue: Forecasting the 1996 Elections.” American Politics Quarterly 24 (4): 403– 535.Google Scholar
Hassett Kevin A. 2003. “Spending with the Best of 'Em.” National Review, July 14, 17– 18.Google Scholar
Holbrook Thomas M. 2005. “A Post-Mortem and Update of the Economic News and Personal Finances Forecasting Model.” PS: Political Science and Politics 38 (January): 35– 36.Google Scholar
Holbrook Thomas M. 2004. “Good News for Bush? Economic News, Personal Finances, and the 2004 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics 37 (October): 759– 761.Google Scholar
Katzner Donald W. 1969. “Political Structure and System and the Notion of Logical Completeness.” General Systems 14: 169– 171.Google Scholar
Katzner Donald W. 1992. The Walrasian Vision of the Microeconomy: An Elementary Exposition of the Structure of Modern General Equilibrium Theory. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck Michael S., and Charles Tien. 2005. “The Jobs Model Forecast: Well Done in 2004.” PS: Political Science and Politics 38 (January): 27– 29.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck Michael S., and Charles Tien. 2004. “Jobs and the Job of President: A Forecast for 2004.” PS: Political Science and Politics 37 (October): 753– 758.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lockerbie Brad. 2004. “A Look to the Future: Forecasting the 2004 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics 37 (October): 741– 743.Google Scholar
Machiavelli Noccolò. 1997. The Prince. Translated and edited by Angelo M. Codevilla. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Morris William T. 1970. “On the Art of Modeling.” In The Process of ModelBuilding in the Behavioral Sciences, eds. W. Ross Ashby et al. Ohio State University Press, 76– 93.Google Scholar
Niskanen William A. 1975. “Bureaucrats and Politicians.” Journal of Law and Economics 18 (3): 617– 643.Google Scholar
Niskanen William A. 1979. “Economic and Political Effects on the Popular Vote for the President.” In Public Policy and Public Choice, eds. Douglas W. Rae and Theodore J. Eismeier. Beverly Hills/London: Sage Publications, 93– 120.Google Scholar
Norpoth Helmut. 2004. “From Primary to General Election: A Forecast of the Presidential Vote.” PS: Political Science and Politics 37 (October): 737– 740.Google Scholar
Norpoth Helmut. 1996. “Of Time and Candidates: A Forecast for 1996.” American Politics Quarterly. Special Issue: Forecasting the 1996 Elections. 24 (4): 443– 463.Google Scholar
Peltzman Sam. 1992. “Voters as Fiscal Conservatives.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 107 (2): 327– 362.Google Scholar
Pribram Karl. 1953. “Patterns of Economic Reasoning.” American Economic Review 43: 243– 258.Google Scholar
Richardson George P. 1991. Feedback Thought in Social Science and Systems Theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Riedl Brian M. 2003. “$20,000 per Household: The Highest Level of Federal Spending Since World War II.” Backgrounder, No. 1710, December 3. The Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
Riker William H. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Russett Cynthia Eagle. 1966. The Concept of Equilibrium in American Social Thought. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sebba Gregor. 1953. “The Development of the Concepts of Mechanism and Model in Physical and Economic Thought.” American Economic Review 43 (May): 259– 268.Google Scholar
Shenhar Aaron. 1990. “On System Properties and Systemhood.” International Journal of General Systems 18 (2): 167– 174.Google Scholar
Wlezien Christopher, and Robert S. Erikson. 2004. “The Fundamentals, the Polls, and the Presidential Vote.” PS: Political Science and Politics 37 (October): 747– 751.Google Scholar