Skip to main content

The Disproportionate Impact of Voter-ID Requirements on the Electorate—New Evidence from Indiana

  • Matt A. Barreto (a1), Stephen A. Nuño (a2) and Gabriel R. Sanchez (a3)

On January 8, 2008, the United States Supreme Court heard arguments in Crawford v. Marion County Election Board, a case related to the discriminatory effects of voter-identification laws in the state of Indiana. Indiana has one of the most stringent voting requirements in the nation, as voters are required to present an up-to-date photo identification issued by the federal or state government in order to cast a ballot. Plaintiffs argued that the Indiana requirements prevent significant and unequal obstacles to the right to vote. The state argued that Indiana had the right to enforce strict requirements to prevent fraud and uphold confidence in the electoral process. Similar laws have also been proposed in many other states, typically related to charges of vote fraud, and often times tied into the divisive debate regarding undocumented immigrants or African American felons. Therefore the recent decision of the Court has tremendous implications to the future of photo-identification laws across the United States.

Hide All
Barreto, Matt, Nuño, Stephen, and Sanchez, Gabriel. 2007. “Voter ID Requirements and the Disenfranchisements of Latino, Black and Asian Voters.” Paper presented at the American Association of Political Science, Annual Conference, Chicago, IL.
Bauer, John R. 1990. “Patterns of Voter Turnout in the American States.” Social Science Quarterly 71: 824–34.
Blank, Robert H. 1974. “Socio-Economic Determinism of Voting Turnout: A Challenge.” Journal of Politics 36: 731–52.
Campbell, Angus, Converse, Philip E., Miller, Warren E., and Stokes, Donald E.. 1960. The American Voter. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Downs, Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Bros.
Jackson, Robert A. 1993.“ Voter Mobilization in the 1986 Midterm Election.” Journal of Politics 55: 1081–99.
Katosh, John P., and Traugott, Michael W.. 1982. “Costs and Values in the Calculus of Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 26: 361.
Keeter, Scott, Miller, Carolyn, Kohut, Andrew, Groves, Robert M., and Presser, Stanley. 2000. “Consequences of Reducing Nonresponse in a National Telephone Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64 (2): 125–48.
Kim, Jae-On, Petrocik, John R., and Enokson, Stephen N.. 1975. “Voter Turnout among the American States: Systemic and Individual Components.” American Political Science Review 69: 107–31.
Minnite, Lorraine. 2007. “The Politics of Voter Fraud.” A Project Vote Report, March 5.
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard A.. 1989. Why Americans Don't Vote. New York: Pantheon Books.
Piven, Frances Fox, and Cloward, Richard A.. 2000. Why Americans Still Don't Vote: And Why Politicians Want it that Way. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Riker, William H., and Ordeshook, Peter C.. 1968. “A Theory of the Calculus of Voting.” American Political Science Review 62: 2542.
Sanders, Elizabeth. 1980. “On the Costs, Utilities, and Simple Joys of Voting.” Journal of Politics 42 (3): 854–63.
Shaw, Daron, de la Garza, Rodolfo, and Lee, Jongho. 2000. “Examining Latino Turnout in 1996: A Three-State Validated Survey Approach.” American Journal of Political Science 44: 338–46.
Sigelman, Lee. 1982. “The Nonvoting Voter in Voting Research.” American Journal of Political Science 26: 4756.
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay, and Brady, Henry. 1995. Voice and Equality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wolfinger, Raymond E., and Rosenstone, Steven J.. 1980. Who Votes? New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed