Skip to main content

Gender Bias in International Relations Graduate Education? New Evidence from Syllabi

  • Jeff Colgan (a1)

Gender diversity is good for the study of international relations (IR) and political science. Graduate training is an opportunity for scholars to affect the demographics of their field and the gendered practices within it. This article presents a first-cut investigation of the degree to which gender bias exists in graduate IR syllabi. The author found that the gender of the instructor for graduate courses matters significantly for what type of research is taught, in two ways. First, on average, female instructors assign significantly more research by female authors than male instructors. Second, women appear to be considerably more reluctant than men about assigning their own research as required readings. Some but not all of the difference between male- and female-taught courses might be explained by differences in course composition.

Hide All
American Political Science Association. 2004. Women’s Advancement in Political Science: A Report of the APSA Workshop on the Advancement of Women in Academic Political Science in the United States.
Breuning Marijke and Sanders Kathryn. 2007. “Gender and Journal Authorship in Eight Prestigious Political Science Journals.” PS: Political Science & Politics 40 (2): 347–51.
Carpenter Charli. 2009. “What to Read on Gender and Foreign Policy.” Foreign Affairs. Available at Accessed February 7, 2016.
Clark Nancy. 2014. “Act Now to Shrink the Confidence Gap.” Forbes. Available at Accessed February 8, 2016.
Colgan Jeff D. 2016. “Where Is International Relations Going? Evidence from Graduate Training.” International Studies Quarterly. Available online.
Colgan Jeff D. 2015. “New Evidence of Gender Bias in IR Syllabi.” Duck of Minerva (August 27). Available at Accessed July 20, 2016.
Hagmann Jonas and Biersteker Thomas. 2014. “Beyond the Published Discipline: Toward a Critical Pedagogy of International Studies.” European Journal of International Relations 20 (2): 291315.
Hancock Kathleen, Baum Matthew, and Breuning Marijke. 2013. “Women and Pre-Tenure Scholarly Productivity in International Studies: An Investigation into the Leaky Career Pipeline.” International Studies Perspectives 14 (4): 507–27.
Hendrix Cullen. 2015. “Google Scholar Metrics and Scholarly Productivity in International Relations,” Duck of Minerva. (August 6). Available at Accessed October 21, 2016.
Kristensen Peter. 2015. “Revisiting the ‘American Social Science’: Mapping the Geography of International Relations.” International Studies Perspectives 16 (3): 246–69.
Lake David. 2013. “Gender Bias in Professional Networks and Citations.” The Washington Post. Available at Accessed February 7, 2016.
Nexon Daniel. 2013. “The Citation Gap: Results of a Self-Experiment,” Duck of Minerva. (August 16). Available at Accessed Oct 21 2016.
Maliniak Daniel, Powers Ryan, and Walter Barbara. 2013. “The Gender Citation Gap in International Relations.” International Organization 67 (4): 889922.
Reiter Dan. 2016. “Citation Count Data and Faculty Promotion,” Duck of Minerva. (February 18). Available at Accessed October 21, 2016.
Schwartz-Shea Peregrine. 2003. “Is This the Curriculum We Want? Doctoral Requirements and Offerings in Methods and Methodology.” PS: Political Science & Politics 36 (3): 379–86.
Sedowski Leanne and Brintnall Michael. 2007. “Data Snapshot: The Proportion of Women in the Political Science Profession” (1-3). Available at Accessed July 19, 2014.
Vitalis Robert. 2015. White World Order, Black Power Politics: The Birth of American International Relations. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Walter Barbara. 2013. “How to Reduce the Gender Gap in One (Relatively) Easy Step.” The Washington Post. Available at Accessed February 7, 2016.
Young Cheryl. 1995. “An Assessment of Articles Published by Women in 15 Top Political Science Journals.” PS: Political Science & Politics 28 (3): 525–33.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 39
Total number of PDF views: 212 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 662 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 31st March 2017 - 24th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.