Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Gender in the 2008 Presidential Election: Two Types of Time Collide

  • Patricia Lee Sykes (a1)
Extract

Placing the 2008 election in the context of political development reveals the gendered nature of the presidency and presidential elections. The institution of the presidency is predominantly masculinist. It privileges conventional masculine attributes of strength, determination, and decisiveness. Yet the degree to which the institution requires masculinist leadership attributes varies throughout political development and according to different types of time. Viewed through a chronological linear lens, developments in “historical time” magnify the most masculinist aspect of the presidency—the role of commander in chief. On the other hand, in 2008 “political time” signals the end of the neoliberal era and a shift away from confrontational, partisan politics toward the building of a new consensus that emphasizes domestic welfare. As a result, the nature and stage of the regime cycle or moment in political time favor feminalist features of leadership such as collective engagement, cooperation, and conciliation. In the 2008 election, these two types of time collide, and the collision helps explain the gender-specific character of the campaigns, the candidates, and the next president.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Clift Eleanor, and Brazaitis Tom. 2000. Madam President: Shattering the Last Glass Ceiling. New York: Scribner.
Clift Eleanor, and Brazaitis Tom. 2003. Madam President: Women Blazing the Leadership Trail. New York: Routledge.
Di Stephano Christine. 1983. “Masculinity as Ideology in Political Theory: Hobbesian Man Reconsidered.” Women's Studies International Forum 6 (6): 633–44.
Duerst-Lahti Georgia. 2002. “Governing Institutions, Ideologies, and Gender: Toward the Possibility of Equal Political Representation.” Sex Roles 47 (November): 371–88.
Duerst-Lahti Georgia, and Kelly Rita Mae. 1995. “On Governance, Leadership, and Gender.” In Gender Power, Leadership, and Governance, ed. Duerst-Lahti Georgia and Kelly Rita Mae. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, chapter 1.
Gender and Politics. 2007. “Studying Gender and Politics Over Time.” Symposium. 3 (3): 369408.
Hamilton Alexander, Madison James, and Jay John. 1987. The Federalist Papers. New York: Penguin Classics.
Han Lori Cox. 2007. “Is the United States Really Ready for a Woman President?” In Rethinking Madam President: Are We Ready for a Woman in the White House?, ed. Han Lori Cox and Heldman Caroline. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, chapter 1.
Heldman Caroline, Carroll Susan, and Olson Stephanie. 2005. “‘She Brought Only a Skirt’: Print Media Coverage of Elizabeth Dole's Bid for the Republican Presidential Nomination.” Political Communication 22 (3): 315–35.
New Zealand Herald. 1999. “Leaders Showing Little Inspiration.” Editorial, November 2.
North & South. 1999. Special issue, Election 1999, September.
Rosenthal Cindy Simon. 1998. When Women Lead: Integrative Leadership in State Legislatures. New York: Oxford University Press.
Skowronek Stephen. 2003. “Presidential Leadership in Political Time.” In The Presidency and the Political System, 7thed., ed. Nelson Michael. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly, chapter 5.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 8
Total number of PDF views: 27 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 171 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th February 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.