Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Gender, Teaching Evaluations, and Professional Success in Political Science

  • Lisa L. Martin (a1)
Abstract

Evaluations of teaching effectiveness rely heavily on student evaluations of teaching. However, an accumulating body of evidence shows that these evaluations are subject to gender bias. Theories of leadership and role incongruity suggest that this bias should be especially prominent in large courses. This article examines publicly available data from two large political science departments and finds that female instructors receive substantively and significantly lower ratings than male instructors in large courses. The author discusses the implications of apparent gender bias in teaching evaluations for the professional success of female faculty. Findings of gender bias in evaluations in other fields also hold in political science and are particularly problematic in the evaluation of large courses.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Gender, Teaching Evaluations, and Professional Success in Political Science
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Gender, Teaching Evaluations, and Professional Success in Political Science
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Gender, Teaching Evaluations, and Professional Success in Political Science
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
References
Hide All
Andersen, Kristi, and Miller, Elizabeth D.. 1997. “Gender and Student Evaluations of Teaching.” PS: Political Science & Politics 30: 216–18.
Arbuckle, Julianne, and Williams, Benne D.. 2003. “Students’ Perceptions of Expressiveness: Age and Gender Effects on Teacher Evaluations.” Sex Roles 49: 507–16.
Baldwin, Tamara, and Blattner, Nancy. 2003. “Guarding Against Potential Bias in Student Evaluations: What Every Faculty Member Needs to Know.” College Teaching 51: 2732.
Basow, Susan A., and Silberg, Nancy T.. 1987. “Student Evaluations of College Professors: Are Female and Male Professors Rated Differently?” Journal of Educational Psychology 79: 308–14.
Bianchini, Stefano, Lissoni, Francesco, and Pezzoni, Michele. 2012. “Instructor Characteristics and Students’ Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness.” European Journal of Engineering Education, iFirst: 120.
Boring, Anne. 2015. “Gender Biases in Student Evaluations of Teachers.” Working paper, OFCE-PRESAGE-Sciences Po and LEDa-DIAL (France).
Braga, Michele, Paccagnella, Marco, and Pellizzari, Michele. 2014. “Evaluating Students’ Evaluations of Professors.” Economics of Education Review 41: 7188.
Butler, Dore, and Geis, Florence L.. 1990. “Nonverbal Affect Responses to Male and Female Leaders: Implications for Leadership Evaluations.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58: 4859.
Centra, John A., and Gaubatz, Noreen B.. 2000. “Is There Gender Bias in Student Evaluations of Teaching?” The Journal of Higher Education 70: 1733.
Dion, Michelle. 2008. “All-Knowing or All-Nurturing? Student Expectations, Gender Roles, and Practical Suggestions for Women in the Classroom.” PS: Political Science & Politics 41 (4): 853–6.
Eagly, Alice H., and Karau, Steven J.. 2002. “Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice toward Female Leaders.” Psychological Review 109: 573–98.
Feldman, Kenneth A. 1993. “College Students’ Views of Male and Female College Teachers: Part II—Evidence from Students’ Evaluations of Their Classroom Teachers.” Research in Higher Education 34: 151211.
Johnson, Michael D., Narayanan, Arunachalam, and Sawaya, William J.. 2013. “Effects of Course and Instructor Characteristics on Student Evaluation of Teaching across a College of Engineering.” Journal of Engineering Education 102 (2): 289318.
Johnson, Stefanie, Murphy, Susan, Zewdie, Selamawit, and Reichard, Rebecca. 2008. “The Strong, Sensitive Type: Effects of Gender Stereotypes and Leadership Prototypes on the Evaluation of Male and Female Leaders.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 106: 3960.
Langbein, Laura I. 1994. “The Validity of Student Evaluations of Teaching.” PS: Political Science & Politics 27 (3): 545–53.
MacNell, Lillian, Driscoll, Adam, and Hunt, Andrea N.. 2014. “What’s in a Name: Exposing Gender Bias in Student Ratings of Teaching.” Innovative Higher Education 40 (4): 291303.
Martin, Elaine. 1984. “Power and Authority in the Classroom: Sexist Stereotypes in Teaching Evaluations.” Signs 9: 482–92.
Miller, Joann, and Chamberlin, Marilyn. 2000. “Women are Teachers, Men are Professors: A Study of Student Perceptions.” Teaching Sociology 28 (4): 283–98.
Ridgeway, Cecelia L. 2001. “Gender, Status, and Leadership.” Journal of Social Issues 57: 637–55.
Rudman, Laurie A., and Glick, Peter. 2001. “Prescriptive Gender Stereotypes and Backlash toward Agentic Women.” Journal of Social Issues 57: 743–62.
Sampaio, Anna. 2006. “Women of Color Teaching Political Science: Examining the Intersections of Race, Gender, and Course Material in the Classroom.” PS: Political Science & Politics 39 (4): 917–22.
Sidanius, Jim, and Crane, Marie. 1989. “Job Evaluation and Gender: The Case of University Faculty.” Journal of Applied Social Psychology 19: 174–97.
Smith, Holly. 2012. “The Unintended Consequences of Grading Teaching.” Teaching in Higher Education 17: 747–54.
Stark, Philip B., and Freishtat, Richard. 2014. “An Evaluation of Course Evaluations.” Manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.
Wigington, Henry, Tollefson, Nona, and Rodriguez, Edme. 1989. “Students’ Ratings of Instructors Revisited: Interactions among Class and Instructor Variables.” Research in Higher Education 30: 331–44.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed