Skip to main content Accessibility help

Graduate Advising in Experimental Research Groups

  • James N. Druckman (a1), Adam J. Howat (a1) and Kevin J. Mullinix (a2)


Survey and laboratory experiments are increasingly common in political science. Investment in experimental data collection comes with costs and benefits, particularly for graduate students and advisers. This article describes a set of institutionalized procedures we have adopted with the goal of capitalizing on the advantages that come with experimental research. This includes requiring planning documents, holding research-group meetings, and centralizing data collection. We conclude by discussing the limitations of our approach, ultimately highlighting the need for more disciplinary conversation about how to best structure research groups to produce quality research and advising.



Hide All
Berinsky, Adam J., Huber, Gregory A., and Lenz, Gabriel S.. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research:’s Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20 (3): 351–68.
Bolsen, Toby, and Druckman, James N.. 2015. “Counteracting the Politicization of Science.” Journal of Communication 65: 745–69.
Busby, Ethan C., Druckman, James N., and Fredendall, Alexandria. 2017. “The Political Relevance of Irrelevant Events.” Journal of Politics 79 (1): 346–50.
Druckman, James N. 2015. “Merging Research and Undergraduate Teaching in Political Behavior Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics 48 (1): 53–7.
Druckman, James N., Fein, Jordan, and Leeper, Thomas J.. 2012. “A Source of Bias in Public Opinion Stability.” American Political Science Review 106 (2): 430–54.
Druckman, James N., Lynn Hennessy, Cari, St.Charles, Kristi, and Weber, Jonathan. 2010. “Competing Rhetoric over Time: Frames Versus Cues.” Journal of Politics 72 (1): 136–48.
Druckman, James N., and Lupia, Arthur. 2012. “Experimenting with Politics.” Science 335: 1177–9.
Fugate, Gregory A., Jaramillo, Patricia A., and Preuhs, Robert R.. 2001. “Graduate Students Mentoring Graduate Students: A Model for Professional Development.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34 (1): 132–3.
Key, Ellen. 2016. “How Are We Doing? Data Access and Replication in Political Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 49 (2): 268–72.
King, Gary, and Sands, Melissa. 2015. “How Human-Subjects Research Rules Mislead You and Your University, and What to Do About It.” Harvard University: Working Paper.
Klar, Samara, and Piston, Spencer. 2015. “The Influence of Competing Appeals on Individual Donations.” Journal of Public Policy 2: 171–91.
Krupnikov, Yanna, and Levine, Adam Seth. 2014. “Cross-Sample Comparisons and External Validity.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 1: 5980.
Leeper, Thomas J. 2011. “The Role of Protocol in the Design and Reporting of Experiments.” Newsletter of the American Political Science Association Experimental Section 2: 610.
Leeper, Thomas J. 2015. “The Multiple Roots of Credibility.” The Political Methodologist 23: 1115.
Lin, Winston, and Green, Donald P.. 2016. “Standard Operating Procedures: A Safety Net for Pre-Analysis Plans.” PS: Political Science & Politics 49 (3): 495500.
Lupia, Arthur, and Elman, Colin. 2014. “Openness in Political Science: Data Access and Research Transparency.” PS: Political Science & Politics 47 (1): 1942.
McDermott, Rose. 2002. “Experimental Methods in Political Science.” Annual Review of Political Science 5: 3161.
Morton, Rebecca B., and Williams, Kenneth C.. 2010. Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality: From Nature to the Lab. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mullinix, Kevin J. 2016. “Partisanship and Preference Formation: Competing Motivations, Elite Polarization, and Issue Importance.” Political Behavior 38 (2): 383411.
Mullinix, Kevin J., Leeper, Thomas J., Druckman, James N., and Freese, Jeremy. 2015. “The Generalizability of Survey Experiments.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 2 (2): 109–38.
Nosek, Brian A., et al. 2015. “Promoting an Open Research Culture.” Science 348: 1422–5.
Rogowski, Ronald. 2016. “The Rise of Experimentation in Political Science.” In Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource, ed. Scott, Robert A., 111. Stanford, CA: Center for Advanced Studies in the Behavioral Sciences.
Simonsohn, Uri. 2013. “Just Post It: The Lesson from Two Cases of Fabricated Data Detected by Statistics Alone.” Psychological Science 24 (10): 1875–888.
Sniderman, Paul M. 1995. “Evaluation Standards for a Slow-Moving Science.” PS: Political Science & Politics 28 (3): 464–7.
Sniderman, Paul M. 2011. “The Logic and Design of the Survey Experiment: An Autobiography of a Methodological Innovation.” In Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science, ed. Druckman, James N., Green, Donald P., Kuklinski, James H., and Lupia, Arthur, 102–14. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Druckman et al. supplementary material
Druckman et al. supplementary material 1

 PDF (332 KB)
332 KB

Graduate Advising in Experimental Research Groups

  • James N. Druckman (a1), Adam J. Howat (a1) and Kevin J. Mullinix (a2)


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.