Skip to main content

Income, Preferences, and the Dynamics of Policy Responsiveness

  • Joseph Daniel Ura (a1) and Christopher R. Ellis (a2)

A variety of measures indicate that income inequality has grown significantly in the United States during the last three decades (APSA 2004; Brandolini and Smeeding 2006). In a flurry of recent research, scholars have attributed this trend to the failure of the national government to represent the preferences of ordinary citizens in general and less wealthy citizens in particular (APSA 2004; Bartels 2004; 2006; Gilens 2005), who participate in politics less consistently and contribute fewer resources to political candidates than their wealthier peers (Verba, Schlozman, and Brady 1995). The American Political Science Association's (APSA) Task Force on Inequality and American Democracy summarizes this representative failure hypothesis: “disparities in participation ensure that ordinary Americans speak in a whisper while the most advantaged roar” (2004, 2).

Hide All
APSA. 2004. America in an Age of Rising Inequality. Task Force on Inequality and American Democracy.
Bartels, Larry M. 2004. “Partisan Politics and the U.S. Income Distribution.” Unpublished manuscript. Princeton University.
Bartels, Larry M. 2005. “Homer Gets a Tax Cut: Inequality and Public Policy in the American Mind.” Perspectives on Politics 3 (March): 1531.
Bartels, Larry M. 2006. “Is the Water Rising? Reflections on Inequality and American Democracy.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (January): 3842.
Beck, Nathaniel. 1990. “Estimating Dynamic Models Using Kalman Filtering.” Political Analysis 1: 121–56.
Bennett, Steven, and Resnick, David. 1990. “The Implications of Nonvoting for Democracy in the United States.” American Journal of Political Science 34 (3): 771802.
Brandolini, Andrea, and Smeeding, Timothy M.. 2006. “Patterns of Economic Inequality in Western Democracies: Some Facts on Levels and Trend.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (January): 21–6.
Brunell, Thomas L., and DiNardo, John. 2004. “A Propensity Reweighting Approach to Simulating the Partisan Effects of Full Turnout in American Presidential Elections.” Political Analysis 12 (1): 2845.
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Brady, David, and Cogan, John. 2002. “Out of Step, Out of Office: Electoral Accountability and House Members' Voting.” American Political Science Review 96 (1): 127–40.
Citrin, Jack, Schickler, Eric, and Sides, John. 2003. “What if Everyone Voted? Simulating the Impact of Increased Turnout in Senate Elections.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (1): 7590.
Cox, Gary W., and McCubbins, Mathew D.. 1993. Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley: University of California Press.
DeNardo, James. 1980. “Turnout and the Vote: The Joke's on the Democrats.” American Political Science Review 74 (2): 406–20.
Ellis, Christopher R., Ura, Joseph Daniel, and Ashley-Robinson, Jenna. 2006. The Dynamic Consequences of Nonvoting in American National Elections. Political Research Quarterly 59 (June): 227–33.
Enns, Peter K., and Kellstedt, Paul M.. 2007. “Policy Mood and Political Sophistication: Why Everybody Moves Mood.” British Journal of Political Science 38 (3): 433–54.
Erikson, Robert S., MacKuen, Michael B., and Stimson, James A.. 2002. The Macro Polity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gant, Michael M., and Lyons, William. 1993. “Democratic Theory, Nonvoting, and Public Policy: The 1987–88 Presidential Elections.” American Politics Quarterly 21 (2): 185204.
Gilens, Martin. 2005. “Public Opinion and Democratic Responsiveness: Who Gets What They Want from Government?” Presented at the annual meeting of the inequality working groups sponsored by the Russell Sage Foundation: Berkley, CA.
Gottschalk, Peter, and Smeeding, Thomas M.. 1997. “Cross-National Comparisons of Earnings and Income Inequality.” Journal of Economic Literature 35 (June): 633–87.
Hibbs, Douglas Jr. 1977. “Political Parties and Macroeconomic Policies.” American Political Science Review 71 (December): 1,467–87.
Highton, Benjamin, and Wolfinger, Raymond E.. 2001. “The Political Implications of Higher Turnout.” British Journal of Political Science 31 (1): 179223.
Kelly, Nathan J. 2005. “Political Choice, Public Policy, and Distributional Outcomes.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (4): 865–80.
Martinez, Michael, and Gill, Jeff. 2005. “The Effects of Turnout on Partisan Outcomes in U.S. Presidential Elections 1960–2000.” Journal of Politics 67 (4): 1,248–74.
Mayhew, David. 1974. Congress: The Electoral Connection. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Nagel, Jack H., and McNulty, John. 1996. “Partisan Effects of Voter Turnout in Senatorial and Gubernatorial Elections.” American Political Science Review 90 (4): 780–93.
Orwell, George. [1941] 2005. “The Lion and the Unicorn: Socialism and the English Genius.” In Why I Write. New York: Penguin, 1194.
Page, Benjamin I., and Shapiro, Robert Y.. 1983. “Effects of Public Opinion on Policy.” American Political Science Review 77 (1): 175–90.
Rohde, David W. 1991. Parties and Leaders in the Postreform House. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Rothenberg, Lawrence, and Sanders, Mitchell. 2000. “Severing the Electoral Connection: Shirking in the Contemporary Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 44 (2): 310–9.
Soroka, Stuart N., and Wlezien, Christopher. 2008. “On the Limits to Inequality in Representation.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41 (April): 219327.
Stimson, James A. 1999. Public Opinion in America. 2nded. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Tucker, Harvey J., and Vedlitz, Arnold. 1986. “Does Heavy Turnout Help Democrats in Presidential Elections?American Political Science Review 80 (4): 1,291–8.
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weissberg, Robert. 2006. “Politicized Pseudo Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (January): 33–7.
Welch, Finis. 1999. “In Defense of Inequality.” American Economic Review 89 (2): 117.
Wlezien, Christopher. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 9811,000.
Wlezien, Christopher. 1996. “Dynamics of Representation: The Case of US Spending on Defense.” British Journal of Political Science 26 (1): 81103.
Wlezien, Christopher. 2004. “Patterns of Representation: Dynamics of Public Preferences and Policy.” Journal of Politics 66 (1): 124.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 16
Total number of PDF views: 153 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 499 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th August 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.