Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-jr42d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T22:30:40.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Inequality and Redistribution: Some Continuing Puzzles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 September 2009

Robert R. Kaufman
Robert R. Kaufman
Affiliation:
Rutgers University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An unequal distribution of income and wealth is an inherent feature of all complex societies, and up to a point, a desirable one. A highly skewed distribution, however, raises questions of serious moral and practical concern: To what extent does socioeconomic inequality undermine the principle of political equality on which democratic societies are based? Under what conditions does it lead to lead to political polarization that retards economic growth or threatens the stability of democratic institutions? And under what circumstances do distributive struggles become the basis for violent social protest or rebellion?

Type
Symposium
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 42 , Issue 4 , October 2009 , pp. 657 - 660
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acemoglu, Daron, and Robinson, James A.. 2006. Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, Di Tella, Rafael, and MacColloch, Robert. 2004. “Inequality and Happiness: Are Europeans and Americans Different?” Journal of Public Economics 88: 2009–42.Google Scholar
Alesina, Alberto, and Perotti, Roberto. 1993. “Income Inequality, Political Instability, and Investment.” NBER Working Paper No. 4486, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.Google Scholar
Bartels, Larry M. 2008. Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. New York: Russell Sate Foundation.Google Scholar
Benabou, Roland, and Ok, Efe A.. 2001. “Social Mobility and the Demand for Redistribution: The POUM Hypothesis.” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (May): 447–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birdsall, Nancy, Graham, Carol, and Sabot, Richard H., eds. 1998. Beyond Tradeoffs: Market Reform and Equitable Growth in Latin America. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2003. Democracy and Redistribution. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2008. “Economic Roots of Civil Wars and Revolutions in the Contemporary World.” World Politics, 60 (April): 390–437.Google Scholar
Collier, Paul, and Hoeffler, Anke. 2000. “Greed and Grievance in Civil War.” Policy Research Paper 2355, World Bank.Google Scholar
Corneo, Giacomo, and Gruner, Hans Peter. 2002. “Individual Preferences for Redistribution.” Journal of Public Economics 83 (1): 87–107.Google Scholar
Fearon, James D., and Laitin, David D.. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review 97 (1): 75–90.Google Scholar
Feldman, Stanley. 2003. “A Conflicted Public? Equality, Fairness, and Redistribution.” Prepared for presentation at the Conference on Inequality and American Democracy, Princeton University, November 7–8.Google Scholar
Graham, Carol, and Pettinato, Stefano. 2001. Happiness and Hardship: Opportunities and Insecurities in New Market Economies. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Haggard, Stephan, and Kaufman, Robert R.. 2008. Development, Democracy, and Welfare States: Latin America, East Asia, and Eastern Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Horowitz, Donald. 1985. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Huber, Evelyne, Nielsen, François, Pribble, Jenny, and Stephens, John D.. 2006. “Politics and Inequality in Latin America and the Caribbean.” American Sociological Review 71 (December): 943–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald F. 1997. Modernization and Postmodernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kaufman, Robert R. 2009. “The Political Effects of Inequality in Latin America: Some Inconvenient Facts.” Comparative Politics 41 (April): 359–79.Google Scholar
Kenworth, Lane, and McCall, Leslie. 2008. “Inequality, Public Opinion and Redistribution.” Socio-Economic Review 6: 35–68.Google Scholar
Lora, Eduardo. 2008. Beyond Facts: Understanding the Quality of Life. Washington, D.C.: Inter-American Development Bank.Google Scholar
Mares, Isabela. 2005. “Social Protection around the World: External Insecurity, State Capacity and Domestic Political Cleavages.” Comparative Political Studies 38 (6): 623–51.Google Scholar
McAdam, Doug, Tarrow, Sidney, and Tilly, Charles. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Meltzer, A., and Richard, S.. 1981. “A Rational Theory of the Size of Government.” Journal of Political Economy 89 (October): 914–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheve, Kenneth, and Stasavage, David. 2008. “Religion and Social Insurance: Evidence from the United States, 1970–2002.” In Divide and Deal: The Politics of Distribution in Democracies, ed. Shapiro, Ian, Swenson, Peter A., and Donno, Daniela. New York: New York University Press, 149–86.Google Scholar
Soifer, Hillel David. 2009. “The Redistributive Threat: State Power and the Effect of Inequality on Democracy.” BWPI Working Paper 93, Brooks World Poverty Institute, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Stewart, Frances. 2000. “Crisis Prevention: Tackling Horizontal Inequalities.” Oxford Development Studies 28 (3): 245–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1998. Durable Inequality. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Wallerstein, Michael, and Moene, Karl Ove. 2003. “Earnings Inequality and Welfare Spending: A Disaggregated Analysis.” World Politics 55 (July): 485–516.Google Scholar