Skip to main content
×
×
Home

The Never-Ending Drug War: Obstacles to Drug War Policy Termination

  • Renee Scherlen (a1)
Abstract

Why does the war on drugs continue after 40 years? This article combines theories of policy termination and prospect theory to explain the drug war's persistence. After reviewing the case for termination, the article turns to policy termination theory. As previous case studies have demonstrated, rationality and economic reasoning alone fail to persuade politicians to end existing policies. In the case of the drug war, specific characteristics of the drug policy and the current political environment, as well as typical institutional and bureaucratic constraints, create substantial obstacles to end the drug war. Perceptions of the risks and benefits of drug war termination also create difficulties. The article concludes that a number of factors need to shift before drug war policy termination can take place.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Behn, Robert D. 1978. “Closing a Government FacilityPublic Administration Review 38 (4): 332–38.
Bothun, Douglas, and Comer, John C.. 1979. “The Politics of Termination: Concepts and ProcessPolicy Studies Journal 7(3): 540–53.
Brewer, Garry D. 1978. “Termination: Hard Choices-Harder QuestionsPublic Administration Review 38 (4): 338–44.
Daniels, Mark R. 1997. Terminating Public Programs: An American Political Paradox. London: M.E. Sharpe.
DeLeon, Peter. 1987. “Policy Termination as a Political Phenomena.” In The Politics of Policy Evaluation, ed. Palumbo, Dennis J.. London: Sage.
DeLeon, Peter. 1983. “Policy Evaluation and Program Termination.” Policy Studies Review 2 (4): 631–47.
DeLeon, Peter. 1978. “A Theory of Policy Termination.” In The Policy Cycle, eds. May, Judith V. and Wildavsky, Aaron B., 279300. London: Sage.
Excerpts from the President's Message on Drug Abuse Control.” 1971. New York Times, June 18, 22.
Frantz, Janet E. 1992. “Reviving and Revising a Termination ModelPolicy Sciences 25: 175–89.
Gallup. 2007. Little Change in Public's View of the U.S. Drug Problem. http://www.gallup.com/poll/102061/little-change-publics-view-us-drug-problem.aspx
Geva-May, Iris. 2004. “Riding the Wave of Opportunity: Termination in Public Policy.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 14 (3): 309–33.
Kahneman, Daniel, Knetsch, J., and Thaler, R.. 1991. “Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo BiasJournal of Economic Perspectives 5 (1): 193206.
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk Econometrica 47 (2): 263–91.
Kaufman, Herbert. 1976. Are Government Organizations Immortal? Washington, DC: Brookings.
Kerlikowske, Gil. 2009. “Q&A with the New Drug CzarThe Wall Street Journal, May 14.
Kirkpatrick, Susan E., Lester, James P., and Peterson, Mark R.. 1999. “The Policy Termination Process.” Policy Studies Review 16 (1): 210–36.
Jervis, Robert. 1992. “Political Implications of Loss Aversion.” Political Psychology, Special Issue: Prospect Theory and Political Psychology 13 (2): 187204.
Nixon, Richard. 1971a. “Remarks about an Intensified Program for Drug Abuse Prevention and Control,” June 17, accessed via The American Presidency Projecthttp://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=3047&st=Drug+Abuse&st1=
Nixon, Richard. 1971b. “Special Message to the Congress on Drug Abuse Prevention and Control,” June 17, accessed via The American Presidency Projecthttp://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=3048&st=drug+abuse&st1=
Office of National Drug Control Policy. 1997–2010. The National Drug Control Strategy. http://ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/alphaList.aspx?alpha=N
Pacula, Rosalie. 2009. “Legalizing Marijuana: Issues to Consider before Reforming California State LawTestimony Before the Committee on Public Safety, California State Assembly, October 28.
Reagan, Ronald. 1988. “Remarks at a Meeting of the White House Conference for a Drug Free America,” February 29, accessed via The American Presidency Projecthttp://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=35482&st=drug+war&st1=goals
Reagan, Ronald. 1986. “Rational Choice and the Framing of DecisionsJournal of Business 59 (4), Part 2, S251–78.
Welch, David A. 2005. Painful Choices: A Theory of Foreign Policy Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wilson, James Q. 1989. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. New York: Basic Books.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed