Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
×
Home

Perceptions of Threat to Religious Liberty

  • Kirby Goidel (a1), Brian Smentkowski (a2) and Craig Freeman (a3)
Abstract

Religious freedom in the United States is widely enjoyed and vigorously protected. Yet, a substantial percentage of Americans believe that their religious liberties are threatened. This article investigates the origins of these perceptions, focusing on the role of political orientations, religious identities and behaviors, social issues (i.e., gay marriage and abortion), and news attentiveness. We found that perceptions of threat are related to political orientations (i.e., partisan affiliation, ideology, and Tea Party identification) and issue positions (i.e., opposition to gay marriage). Consistent with theories of elite cue-taking, the effects of partisan affiliation are contingent on news attentiveness. Republicans who pay closer attention to the news are more likely to state that their religious liberties are threatened.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Arceneaux, Kevin and Johnson, Martin. 2013. Changing Minds or Changing Channels: Partisan News in an Age of Choice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Bennett, Lance. 1991. “Toward a Theory of Press–State Relations in the United States.” Journal of Communication 40 (2): 103–25.
Berinsky, Adam J. 2007. “Assuming the Costs of War: Events, Elites, and American Public Support for Military Conflict.” Journal of Politics 69 (4): 975–7.
Blake, Aaron. 2015. “The Striking Decline of ‘Values’ in American Politics.” The Washington Post’s The Fix Blog. Available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/wp/2015/01/07/the-striking-decline-of-values-in-american-politics/. Accessed March 21, 2016.
Brewer, Paul R. 2002. “Framing, Value Words, and Citizens’ Explanations of Their Issue Opinions.” Political Communication 19: 303–16.
Brewer, Paul R. 2003. “Values, Political Knowledge, and Public Opinion About Gay Rights.” Public Opinion Quarterly 67 (2): 173201.
Campbell, David E. 2006. “Religious ‘Threat’ in Contemporary Presidential Elections.” Journal of Politics 68 (1): 104–15.
Dancey, Logan and Goren, Paul. 2010. “Party Identification, Issue Attitudes, and the Dynamics of Political Debate.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (3): 686–99.
Djupe, Paul A. and Calfano, Brian R.. 2013a. “Religious Value Priming, Threat, and Political Tolerance.” Political Research Quarterly 66: 768–80.
Djupe, Paul A. and Calfano, Brian R.. 2013b. “Divine Intervention? The Influence of Religious Value Communication on US Intervention Policy.” Political Behavior 35 (4): 643–63.
Djupe, Paul A. and Gilbert, Christopher P.. 2008. “Politics and Church: Byproduct or Central Mission?” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 47 (1): 4562.
Djupe, Paul A., Lewis, Andrew R., and Jelen, Ted G.. 2015. “Rights, Reflection, and Reciprocity: How Rights Talk Affects the Political Process.” Paper presented at the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, April 18, 2015.
Domke, David and Watts, Mark D.. 1999. “The Politics of Conservative Elites and the ‘Liberal Media’ Argument.” Journal of Communication 49 (4): 3558.
Druckman, James N. 2001. “The Implications of Framing Effects for Citizen Competence.” Political Behavior 23: 225–56.
Druckman, James N. and Nelson, Kjersten R.. 2003. “Framing and Deliberation: How Citizens’ Conversations Limit Elite Influence.” American Journal of Political Science 47 (4): 729–45.
Fiske, Susan T. and Taylor, Shelley E.. 1991. Social Cognition. 2nd edition. McGraw-Hill Series in Social Psychology. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Goidel, Kirby and Nisbet, Matthew. 2006. “Exploring the Roots of Public Participation in the Controversy over Embryonic Stem Cell Research and Cloning.” Political Behavior 28: 175–92.
Guth, James L., Green, John C., Kellstedt, Lyman A., and Smidt, Corwin E.. 1995. “Faith and the Environment: Religious Beliefs and Attitudes on Environmental Policy.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (2): 364–82.
Guth, James L., Green, John C., Kellstedt, Lyman A., and Smidt, Corwin E.. 1996. “Onward Christian Soldiers: Religious Activists Groups in American Politics.” In Religion and the Culture Wars: Dispatches from the Front, ed. Green, John C; Guth, James L.; Smidt, CorwinE.; and Kellstedt, Lyman A., 174–92. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Guth, James L., Smidt, Corwin E., Kellstedt, Lyman A., and Green, John C.. 1993. “The Sources of Antiabortion Attitudes: The Case of Religious Political Activists.” American Politics Research 21 (1): 6580.
Harrison, Brian F. and Michelson, Melissa R.. 2015. “God and Marriage: The Impact of Religious Identity Priming on Attitudes toward Same-Sex Marriage.” Social Science Quarterly 96 (5): 1411–23.
Hibbing, John R., Smith, Kevin B., and Alford, John R.. 2014. “Negativity Bias and Political Preferences: A Response to Commentators.” Behavioral & Brain Sciences 37 (3): 333–50.
Huckfeldt, R. Robert and Sprague, John D.. 1995. Citizens, Politics, and Social Communication: Information and Influence in an Election Campaign. Cambridge Studies in Political Psychology and Public Opinion. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Iyengar, Shanto and Kinder, Donald R.. 1987. News That Matters: Television and American Opinion, American Politics and Political Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
James, William. 1890. The Principles of Psychology. American Science Series Advanced Course. New York: H. Holt and Company.
Jelen, Ted G. 1991. The Political Mobilization of Religious Beliefs. New York: Praeger.
Johnson, Tyler. 2012. “Equality, Morality, and the Impact of Media Framing: Explaining Opposition to Same-Sex Marriage and Civil Unions.” Politics & Policy 40 (6): 1053–80.
Kellstedt, Lyman A., Green, John C., Guth, James L., and Smidt, Corwin. 1996. “Grasping the Essentials: The Social Embodiment of Religion and Political Behavior.” In Religion and the Culture Wars: Dispatches from the Front, ed. Green, John C; Guth, James L.; Smidt, CorwinE.; and Kellstedt, Lyman A., 174–92. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Ladd, Jonathan. 2010. “The Neglected Power of Elite Opinion Leadership to Produce Antipathy toward the News Media: Evidence from a Survey Experiment.” Political Behavior 32: 2950.
Leege, David C. and Kellstedt, Lyman A.. 1993. Rediscovering the Religious Factor in American Politics. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
Levendusky, Matthew. 2013. How Partisan Media Polarize America. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lewis, Andrew R. 2014. “Abortion Politics and the Decline of the Separation of Church and State: The Southern Baptist Case.” Politics and Religion 7 (3): 521–49.
Lilienfeld, Scott O. and Latzman, Robert D.. 2014. “Threat Bias, Not Negativity Bias, Underpins Differences in Political Ideology.” Behavioral & Brain Sciences 37 (3): 318–19.
Martin, Paul S. 2004. “Inside the Black Box of Negative Campaign Effects: Three Reasons Why Negative Campaigns Mobilize.” Political Psychology 25 (4): 545–62.
McCabe, Brian J. and Heerwig, Jennifer A.. 2011. “Reframing the Marriage Debate: Wording, Context, and Intensity of Support for Marriage and Civil Unions.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 24 (4): 429–49
Miller, Joanne M. and Krosnick, Jon A.. 2004. “Threat as a Motivator of Political Activism: A Field Experiment.” Political Psychology 25 (4): 507–23.
Mitchell, Amy. 2013. “News Coverage Conveys Strong Momentum for Same-Sex Marriage.” Pew Research Center. Available at www.journalism.org/files/legacy/EMBARGOED_Same-SexMarriageandNews.pdf. Accessed March 23, 2016.
Mutz, Diana Carole, Sniderman, Paul M., and Brody, Richard A.. 1996. Political Persuasion and Attitude Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Nisbet, Matthew C., Brossard, Dominique, and Kroepsch, Adrianne. 2003. “Framing Science: The Stem Cell Controversy in an Age of Press/Politics.” Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics 8 (2): 3670.
Nisbet, Matthew C. and Mooney, Chris. 2007. “Framing Science.” Science 316 (5821): 56–56.
Nteta, Tatishe M. and Wallsten, Kevin J.. 2012. “Preaching to the Choir? Religious Leaders and American Opinion on Immigration Reform.” Social Science Quarterly (Wiley-Blackwell) 93: 891910.
Prior, Markus. 2007. Post-Broadcast Democracy : How Media Choice Increases Inequality in Political Involvement and Polarizes Elections. Cambridge Studies in Public Opinion and Political Psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Slothuus, Rune. 2010. “When Can Political Parties Lead Public Opinion? Evidence from a Natural Experiment.” Political Communication 27 (2): 158–77.
Smidt, Corwin. 2003. “Clergy in American Politics: An Introduction.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42 (4): 495–9.
Smith, Glen R. 2010. “Politicians and the News Media: How Elite Attacks Influence Perceptions of Media Bias.” International Journal of Press/Politics 15 (3): 319–43.
Stroud, Natalie Jomini. 2011. Niche News: The Politics of News Choice. New York: Oxford University Press.
Tomz, Michael, Wittenberg, Jason, and King, Gary. 2003. “Clarify: Software for Interpreting and Presenting Statistical Results.” Journal of Statistical Software 8: 130.
Valentino, Nicholas A., Hutchings, Vincent L., Banks, Antoine J., and Davis, Anne K.. 2008. “Is a Worried Citizen a Good Citizen? Emotions, Political Information Seeking, and Learning Via the Internet.” Political Psychology 29 (2): 247–73.
Wald, Kenneth D. 1992. Religion and Politics in the United States. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
Wilcox, Clyde and Sigelman, Lee. 2001. “Political Mobilization in the Pews: Religious Contacting and Electoral Turnout.” Social Science Quarterly 82 (3): 524–35.
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed