No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Popular Constitutionalism and Fisher's Dialogues
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 June 2013
Extract
As other contributors to this symposium have noted, Louis Fisher has played a major role in shaping debates in such diverse policy battlegrounds as federal budgeting, war powers, and the use of legislative and presidential vetoes. Fisher is also widely (and fairly) credited with spurring interest in “constitutional dialogues”—the “process in which all three branches” along with “the states and the general public” offer separate, competing, and sometimes complementary visions of the Constitution and the values it embodies (Fisher 1988, 3).
- Type
- Symposium: Law and (Disciplinary) Order: A Dialogue about Louis Fisher, Constitutionalism, and Political Science
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013
References
REFERENCES
Adler, Matthew D. 2006. “Popular Constitutionalism and the Rule of Recognition: Whose Practices Ground U.S. Law?” Northwestern University Law Review 100 (2): 719–805.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry, and Schauer, Frederick. 1997. “On Extrajudicial Constitutional Interpretation.” Harvard Law Review 110 (7): 1359–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgess, Susan R. 1992. Contest for Constitutional Authority: The Abortion and War Powers Debates. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Devins, Neal. 2011. “Party Polarization and Congressional Committee Consideration of Constitutional Questions.” Northwestern University Law Review 105 (2): 737–87.Google Scholar
Devins, Neal. 2012. “Why Congress Did Not Think About the Constitution When Enacting the Affordable Care Act.” Northwestern University Law Review Colloquy 106: 261–82.Google Scholar
Devins, Neal, and Fisher, Louis. 1998. “Judicial Exclusivity and Political Instability.” Virginia Law Review 84: 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devins, Neal, and Fisher, Louis. 2004. The Democratic Constitution. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Lee, and Kobylka, Joseph F.. 1992. The Supreme Court and Legal Change. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Eskridge, William N. Jr. 2002. “Some Effects of Identity-Based Social Movements on Constitutional Law in the Twentieth Century.” Michigan Law Review 100 (8): 2062–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 1987. “Social Influences on Constitutional Law.” Journal of Political Science 15 (1-2): 7–19.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 1988. Constitutional Dialogues: Interpretation as Political Process. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 1998. Testimony before “Congress, the Courts and the Constitution,” hearing before the House Subcommittee on the Constitution, 105th Cong., 2nd Sess.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 2002. Religious Liberty in America: Political Safeguards. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 2008. “Interpreting the Constitution: More than What the Supreme Court Says.” Extensions. Carl Albert Congressional Research and Studies Center, University of Oklahoma.Google Scholar
Fisher, Louis. 2011. “Judicial Credibility.” In The Politics of Judicial Independence, ed. Peabody, Bruce, 227–48. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Fontana, David, and Braman, Donald. 2012. “Judicial Backlash or Just Backlash? Evidence from a National Experiment.” Columbia Law Review 112 (4): 731–99.Google Scholar
Forbath, William E. 2010. “The Will of the People? Pollsters, Elites, and Other Difficulties.” George Washington Law Review 78: 1191–206.Google Scholar
Friedman, Barry. 2009. The Will of the People: How Public Opinion Has Influenced the Supreme Court and Shaped the Meaning of the Constitution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Jacobsohn, Gary J. 1986. The Supreme Court and the Decline of Constitutional Aspiration. Totowa, NJ: Rowman and Littlefield.Google Scholar
Klarman, Michael. 2004. From Jim Crow to Civil Rights: The Supreme Court and the Struggle for Racial Equality. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, Larry. 2004. The People Themselves: Popular Constitutionalism and Judicial Review. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macedo, Stephen. 1986. The New Right v. The Constitution. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
Paulsen, Michael Stokes. 1994. “The Most Dangerous Branch: Executive Power to Say What the Law Is.” Georgetown Law Journal 83: 217–345.Google Scholar
Peabody, Bruce, and Morgan, Kyle. 2013. “Hope, Fear and Loathing, and the Post-Sebelius Disequilibrium: Assessing the Relationship between Parties, Congress, and Courts in Tea Party America.” British Journal of American Legal Studies 2: 29–60.Google Scholar
Persily, Jack Citrin, and Egan, Patrick J., eds. 2008. Public Opinion and Constitutional Controversy. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pozen, David. 2010. “Judicial Elections as Popular Constitutionalism.” Columbia Law Review 110: 2047–134.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, Gerald. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva B. 2006. “Constitutional Culture, Social Movement Conflict, and Constitutional Change: The Case of the de facto ERA.” California Law Review 94 (5): 1323–419.Google Scholar
Teles, Steven M. 2010. The Rise of the Conservative Legal Movement: The Battle for Control of the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Woolley, Peter, and Peabody, Bruce. 2012. “Popular Constitutional Values: The Links between Public Opinion and the Supreme Court's 2011 Term.” Res Gestae Fordham Law Review 81: 1–25.Google Scholar