Skip to main content

Public Election Funding, Competition, and Candidate Gender

  • Timothy Werner (a1) and Kenneth R. Mayer (a1)

In 2000, Arizona and Maine implemented full public funding for state legislative elections, and Connecticut will do so in 2008. Candidates who opt to accept public funding receive grants that pay for the entire cost of their campaigns. Advocates of these so-called clean elections argue that the programs reduce quid pro quo corruption, increase electoral competitiveness, and open up the process to candidates who lack access to traditional fundraising networks (Phelps 2004). Critics respond that the Maine and Arizona public funding programs have achieved nothing, save for imposing unjust burdens on candidates who refuse to participate (Basham and Zelder 2005).

Hide All


Basham, Patrick, and Martin Zelder. 2005. “ Does Cleanliness Lead to Competitiveness? The Failure of Maine's Experiment.” In Welfare for Politicians? Taxpayer Financing of Campaigns, ed. John Samples. Washington, D.C.: CATO Institute.
Burrell, Barbara. 1998. “ Campaign Finance: Women's Experience in the Modern Era.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, eds. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox. New York: Oxford University Press.
Carsey, Thomas M., William D. Berry, and Walter Forrest. 2003. “‘If At First You Don't Succeed…’: Repeat Challengers in State Legislative Elections.” Presented at the Third Annual State Politics and Policy Conference, Tucson, AZ.
Center for American Women in Politics (CAWP). 2007. Women in State Legislatures 2007. Available at:
Dolan, Kathleen A. 2004. Voting for Women: How the Public Evaluates Women Candidates. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Duerst-Lahti, Georgia. 1998. “ The Bottleneck: Women Becoming Candidates.” In Women and Elective Office: Past, Present, and Future, eds. Sue Thomas and Clyde Wilcox. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fox, Richard L., and Jennifer L. Lawless. 2004. “Entering the Arena? Gender and the Decision to Run for Office.” American Journal of Political Science 48 (2): 26480.
Fox, Richard L., and Jennifer L. Lawless. 2005. “To Run or Not to Run for Office: Explaining Nascent Political Ambition.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (3): 64259.
Francis, Wayne L. 1993. “House to Senate Career Movement in the U.S. States: The Significance of Selectivity.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 18 (3): 30920.
Francis, Wayne L., and Lawrence W. Kenny. 2000. Up the Political Ladder: Career Paths in U.S. Politics. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Huber, Peter J. 1967. “The Behavior of Maximum Likelihood Estimates under Non-Standard Conditions.” In Proceedings of the Fifth Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability. Vol. 1. Berkeley: University of California Press.
King, James D. 2002. “Single-Member Districts and the Representation of Women in American State Legislatures: The Effects of Electoral System Change.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 2 (2): 16175.
Kousser, Thad. 2004. Term Limits and the Dismantling of State Legislative Professionalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mayer, Kenneth R., Timothy Werner, and Amanda Williams. 2006. “Do Public Funding Programs Enhance Electoral Competition?” In The Marketplace of Democracy: Electoral Competition and American Politics, eds. Michael P. McDonald and John Samples. Washington, D.C.: CATO Institute and Brookings Institution Press.
Phelps, Douglas H. 2004. “Leveling the Playing Field.” National Civic Review 93 (2): 60.
Pritchard, Anita. 1992. “Changes in Electoral Structures and the Success of Women Candidates: The Case of Florida.” Social Science Quarterly 73 (1): 6271.
Sapiro, Virginia, and Pamela Johnston Conover. 1997. “The Variable Gender Basis of Electoral Politics: Gender and Context in the 1992 U.S. Election.” British Journal of Political Science 27 (4): 497523.
Sapiro, Virginia, and Katherine Cramer Walsh. 2002. “Doing Gender in Congressional Campaign Advertisements.” Prepared for the annual meeting of the International Society of Political Psychology, Berlin.
Squire, Peverill. 1992. “Legislative Professionalization and Membership Diversity in State Legislatures.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 17 (1): 6979.
Thompson, Joel A., Gary F. Moncrief, and Keith E. Hamm. 1998. “ Gender, Candidate Attributes, and Campaign Contributions.” In Campaign Finance in State Legislative Elections, eds. Joel A. Thompson and Gary F. Moncrief. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 41 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 220 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd March 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.