Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Ranking Departments: A Comparison of Alternative Approaches

  • Natalie Masuoka (a1), Bernard Grofman (a1) and Scott L. Feld (a2)
Extract

There are many different ways to develop rankings of Ph.D.-granting academic departments. Perhaps the most common method is reputational: we simply ask knowledgeable scholars in the discipline to provide their rankings and aggregate these in some fashion. Other ways involve more “objective indicators.” But, of course, departments have multiple attributes, e.g., we might be interested in how good a department is as a place to get a Ph.D., or we might be interested simply in the research record of its faculty, etc. Thus, we might want to use different indicators to measure different aspects of the department.

Copyright
References
Hide All

References

Ballard, Michael, and Neil Mitchell. 1998. “The Good, the Better and the Best in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 31 (4): 8268.
Cartter, Allan. 1966. An Assessment of Quality in Graduate Education. Washington, D.C.: American Council on Education.
Garand, James, and Kristy Grady. 1999. “Ranking Political Science Departments: Do Publications Matter?PS: Political Science and Politics 32 (1): 1136.
Gaus, John M. 1934. “The Teaching Personnel in American Political Science Departments: A Report of the Sub-Committee on Personnel of the Committee on Policy to the American Political Science Association, 1934.” American Political Science Review 28 (4): 72665.
Jackman, Robert, and Randolph Silver. 1996. “Rating the Ranking: An Analysis of the National Research Council's Appraisal of Political Science Ph.D. Programs.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29 (2): 15560.
Katz, Richard, and Munroe Eagles. 1996. “Ranking Political Science Programs: A View from the Lower Half.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29 (2): 14954.
Kenniston, Hayward. 1959. Graduate Study and Research in the Arts and Sciences at the University of Pennsylvania. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter. 1986. “Ranking Graduate Departments in the 1980s: Toward Objective Qualitative Indicators.” PS: Political Science and Politics 19 (3): 65161.
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Bernard Grofman, and Janet Campagna. 1989. “The Political Science 400: Citations by Ph.D. Cohort and by Ph.D.-Granting Institution.” PS: Political Science and Politics 22 (2): 25870.
Lowry, Robert, and Brian Silver. 1996. “A Rising Tide Lifts All Boats: Political Science Department Reputation and the Reputation of the University.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29 (2): 1617.
Masuoka, Natalie, Bernard Grofman, and Scott L. Feld. 2007a. “The Political Science 400: A 20-Year Update.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (January): 13345.
Masuoka, Natalie, Bernard Grofman, and Scott L. Feld. 2007b. “The Production and Placement of Political Science Ph.D.s, 1902–2000.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (April): 36170.
McCormick, James, and E. Lee Bernick. 1982. “Graduate Training and Productivity: A Look at Who Publishes.” Journal of Politics 44 (1): 21227.
McCormick, James, and Tom Rice. 2001. “Graduate Training and Research Productivity in the 1990s: A Look at Who Publishes.” PS: Political Science and Politics 34 (3): 67580.
Miller, Arthur, Charles Tien, and Andrew Peebler. 1996. “Department Rankings: An Alternative Approach.” PS: Political Science and Politics 29 (4): 70417.
Morgan, David, and Michael Fitzgerald. 1977. “Recognition and Productivity among American Political Science Departments.” Western Political Quarterly 30 (3): 34250.
Munro, William. 1930. “Appendix VII: Instruction in Political Science in Colleges and Universities.” American Political Science Review 24 (1): 12745.
National Research Council. 1995. Research Doctorate Programs in the United States: Continuity and Change. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Orwell, George. 1946. Animal Farm. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Company
Rice, Tom, James McCormick, and Benjamin Bergmann. 2002. “Graduate Training, Current Affiliation and Publishing Books in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 35 (4): 7515.
Robey, John. 1979. “Political Science Departments: Reputations versus Productivity.” PS: Political Science and Politics 12 (2): 2029.
Rudder, Catherine. 1983. “The Quality of Graduate Education in Political Science: A Report on the New Rankings.” PS: Political Science and Politics 16 (1): 4853.
Schmidt, Benjamin M., and Matthew M. Chingos. 2007. “Ranking Doctoral Programs by Placement: A New Method.” PS: Political Science and Politics 40 (July): 5239.
Somit, Albert, and Joseph Tanenhaus. 1963. “Trends in American Political Science: Some Analytical Notes.” American Political Science Review 57: 9338.
Somit, Albert, and Joseph Tanenhaus. 1964. American Political Science: A Profile of the Discipline. New York: Atherton Press.
Somit, Albert, and Joseph Tanenhaus. 1967. The Development of American Political Science: From Burgess to Behavioralism. New York: Boston, Allyn and Bacon.
U.S. Department of Education. 2005. Institutional Postsecondary Education Data System Completions Survey. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.
U.S. National Academy of Sciences. 1958. Doctorate Production in United States Universities, 1936–1956. Washington D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
U.S. National Academy of Sciences. 1978. A Century of Doctorates: Data Analyses of Growth and Change. Washington, D.C.: National Academy of Sciences.
U.S. National Science Foundation. 2005. Survey of Earned Doctorates Records File. Washington, D.C: National Science Foundation.
U.S. News, and World Report. 2005. America's Best Graduate Schools, 2005 Online Edition. Available at: www.usnews.com/usnews/edu/grad/rankings/phdhum/brief/polrank_brief.php.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed