Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

Reading the Tea Leaves: Understanding Tea Party Caucus Membership in the US House of Representatives

  • Bryan T. Gervais (a1) and Irwin L. Morris (a1)

In the summer of 2010, 52 Republican members of the US House of Representatives joined the newly formed Tea Party Caucus, bringing the first institutional voice to the Tea Party movement. To understand both the policy orientations of the organized Tea Party (in its caucus manifestation) and the institutional strength of the caucus's membership, we assess the extent to which caucus members are distinctive from their fellow Republicans in the US House of Representatives. Our results suggest that membership in the caucus is primarily driven by ideology and economics. Specifically, we find that Tea Party Caucus members are Republicans who are ideologically oriented toward limited government and lower taxes and who hail from particularly prosperous congressional districts. We find no evidence that Tea Party Caucus members serve safer districts or have greater seniority or institutional stature than their Republican colleagues who are not members of the caucus. These findings, we believe, speak not only to the nature and orientations of the Tea Party Caucus, but to the wider Tea Party movement itself.

Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

Christopher H. Achen 1977. “Measuring Representation: Perils of the Correlation Coefficient.” American Journal of Political Science 21: 805–15.

Christopher H. Achen 1978. “Measuring Representation.” American Journal of Political Science 22: 475510.

Scott H. Ainsworth , and F. Akins . 1997. “The Informational Role of Caucuses in the U.S. Congress.” American Politics Research 25: 407–30.

Stephen Ansolabehere , and Philip Edward Jones . 2010. “Constituents' Responses to Congressional Roll-Call Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 54: 583–97.

Jamie L. Carson , Matthew J. Lebo , and Everett Young . 2010. “The Electoral Costs of Party Loyalty in Congress.” American Journal of Political Science 54: 598616.

Samuel Peltzman . 1984. “Constituent Interest and Congressional Voting.” Journal of Law & Economics 27: 181210.

Keith T. Poole , and Howard Rosenthal . 1991. “Patterns of Congressional Voting.” American Journal of Political Science 35: 228–78.

Keith T. Poole , and Howard Rosenthal . 2001. “D-Nominate after 10 Years: A Comparative Update to Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll-Call Voting.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 26 (1): 529.

Jennifer Victor , and Nils Ringe . 2009. “The Social Utility of Informal Institutions: Caucuses as Networks in the 110th United States House of Representatives.” American Politics Research 37 (5): 742–66.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 3
Total number of PDF views: 30 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 137 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 26th May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.