Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Reforming Presidential Nominations: Rotating State Primaries or a National Primary?

  • Caroline J. Tolbert (a1), David P. Redlawsk (a1) and Daniel C. Bowen (a1)
Extract

As part of their ongoing efforts to address frontloading and other perceived problems, both the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and Republican National Committee (RNC) proposed revised schedules and rules for 2008. The major changes for the Democrats were that two new states were allowed to join Iowa and New Hampshire in violating the official February 5 start date. The idea was that these states—Nevada from the West and South Carolina from the South—would enhance participation by more diverse populations (Latinos and African Americans). While the Republican rules called for states to lose half of their delegate vote if they violated the timing rules, the Democrats implemented a “death penalty” requiring any state violating the timing rules to lose all of its delegates. The New York Times called these changes the biggest shift in the way Democrats have nominated their presidential candidates in 30 years. Yet in the end these changes did little to lessen frontloading, as 70% of all delegates were actually chosen by the beginning of March. Two large states (Michigan and Florida) defied both national parties and voted before February 5.

Copyright
References
Hide All
Altschuler, Bruce E. 2008. “Selecting Presidential Nominees by National Primary: An Idea Whose Time Has Come?The Forum 5 (4): Article 5. http://www.bepress.com/forum/vol5/iss4/art5.
Anderson, C., Blais, Andre, Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Listhaug, Ola. 2005. Losers' Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Anderson, Christopher, and LoTempio, Andrew. 2002. “Winning, Losing, and Political Trust in America.” British Journal of Political Science 32: 335–51.
Bowler, Shaun, and Donovan, Todd. 2007. “Reasoning about Institutional Change: Winners, Losers and Support for Electoral Reforms.” British Journal of Political Science 37: 455–76.
Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Karp, Jeffrey. 2002. “When Might Institutions Change? Elite Support for Direct Democracy in Three Nations.” Political Research Quarterly 55: 731–54.
Bowler, Shaun, Donovan, Todd, and Karp, Jeffrey. 2006. “Why Politicians Like Electoral Institutions: Self-Interest, Values, or Ideology.” Journal of Politics 68: 434–46.
Cain, Bruce E., Donovan, Todd, and Tolbert, Caroline J., eds. 2008. Democracy in the States: Experiments in Election Reform. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
Donovan, Todd, and Bowler, Shaun. 2004. Reforming the Republic: Democratic Institutions for the New America. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Hull, Christopher. 2007. Grassroots Rules: How the Iowa Caucus Helps Elect American Presidents. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Knight, Brian, and Schiff, Nathan. 2008. “Momentum and Social Learning in Presidential Primaries.” National Bureau of Economic Research.
Mansbridge, Jane J. 1986. Why We Lost the ERA. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Mayer, William G., and Busch, Andrew E.. 2003. The Front-Loading Problem in Presidential Nominations. Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press.
McDonald, Michael. 2008. United States Election Project. http://elections.gmu.edu/voter_turnout.htm.
Norrander, Barbara. 1992. Super Tuesday: Regional Politics and Presidential Primaries. Lexington: University Press of Kentucky.
Squire, Peverill, ed. 1989. The Iowa Caucuses and the Presidential Nominating Process. Boulder: Westview Press.
Stone, Walter J., Atkeson, Lonna Rae, and Rapoport, Ronald. 1992. “Turning On or Turning Off: Mobilization and Demobilization Effects of Participation in Presidential Nomination Campaigns.” American Journal of Political Science 36: 665–91.
Tolbert, Caroline. 2003. “Direct Democracy and Institutional Realignment in the American States.” Political Science Quarterly 118 (3): 467–89.
Tolbert, Caroline, Smith, Daniel, and Green, John. 2009. “Strategic Voting and Legislative Redistricting Reform: District and Statewide Representational Winners and Losers.” Political Research Quarterly 62 (1).
Winebrenner, Hugh. 1998 The Iowa Precinct Caucuses: The Making of a Media Event. 2nd ed.Ames: Iowa State University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed