No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Trends in Political Science Research and the Progress of Comparative Politics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 October 2017
Abstract
This article illustrates major trends in political science research and frames the progress of research agendas in comparative politics. Drawing on the titles and abstracts of every article published in eight major political science journals between 1906 and 2015, the study tracks the frequency of references to specific keywords over time. The analysis corresponds to and complements extant descriptions of how the field has developed, providing evidence of three ‘revolutions’ that shaped comparative politics—the divorce of political science from history during its early years, a behavioral revolution that lasted until the late 1960s, and a second scientific revolution after 1989 characterized by greater empiricism. Understanding the development of the subdiscipline, and viewing it through the research published in political science over the last 100 years, provides useful context for teaching future comparativists and encourages scholars to think more broadly about the research traditions to which they are contributing.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017
References
REFERENCES
Almond, Gabriel, and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles, and Stokes, Susan C.. 2007. “Introduction.” In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, ed. Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan C., 3–24. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David. 2004. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Chandra, Kanchan. 2001. “Cumulative Findings in the Study of Ethnic Politics.”
Newsletter of the Organized Section in Comparative Politics of the American Political Science Association
12 (1): 7–11.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 2000. “Citizen Attitudes and Political Behavior.”
Comparative Political Studies
33 (6/7): 912–40.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John S. 2006. “Revolutions without Enemies: Key Transformations in Political Science.”
American Political Science Review
100 (4): 487–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, Peter B., Rueschemeyer, Dietrich, and Skocpol, Theda. 1985. Bringing the State Back In. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1999. “What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years?”
Annual Review of Political Science
2 (1): 115–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Peter A., and Taylor, Rosemary C. R.. 1996. “Political Science and the Three New Institutionalisms.”
Political Studies
44 (4): 936–57.Google Scholar
King, Gary. 1989. Unifying Political Methodology: The Likelihood Theory of Statistical Inference. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Alt, James E., Elizabeth Burns, Nancy, and Laver, Michael. 1990. “A Unified Model of Cabinet Dissolution in Parliamentary Democracies.”
American Journal of Political Science
34 (3): 846–71.Google Scholar
King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, Herbert. 2000. “Linkages between Citizens and Politicians in Democratic Polities.”
Comparative Political Studies
33 (6/7): 845–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, Ruth. 1996. “Positivism, Scientific Realism and Political Science: Recent Developments in the Philosophy of Science.”
Journal of Theoretical Politics
8 (3): 361–82.Google Scholar
Lichbach, Mark Irving, and Zuckerman, Alan S.. 2009. “Paradigms and Pragmatism: Comparative Politics during the Past Decade.” In Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, ed. Irving Lichbach, Mark and Zuckerman, Alan S., 1–17. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McLean, Iain, Blais, André, Garand, James C., and Giles, Michael. 2009. “Comparative Journal Ratings: A Survey Report.”
Political Studies Review
7: 18–38.Google Scholar
Medina, Luis Fernando. 2007. A Unified Theory of Collective Action and Social Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Merrill, Samuel III, and Grofman, Bernard. 1999. A Unified Theory of Voting. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L. 2007. “The Past and Present of Comparative Politics.” In Passion, Craft, and Method in Comparative Politics, ed. Munck, Gerardo L. and Snyder, Richard, 32–59. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Munck, Gerardo L., and Snyder, Richard. 2007. “Debating the Direction of Comparative Politics.”
Comparative Political Studies
40 (1): 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepinsky, Thomas. 2014. “The Institutional Turn in Comparative Authoritarianism.”
British Journal of Political Science
44 (3): 631–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabetti, Filippo. 2007. Democracy and Civic Culture. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Politics, ed. Boix, Carles and Stokes, Susan C., 340–362. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sigelman, Lee. 2006. “The Coevolution of American Political Science and the American Political Science Review.”
American Political Science Review
100 (4): 463–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson supplementary material
Online Appendix
PDF
62 KB