Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa

The Veepstakes: Forecasting Vice Presidential Selection in 2008

  • Jody C Baumgartner (a1)

One of the more entertaining pastimes during the presidential campaign is the “veepstakes,” or speculation about who the presidential nominee will select for a running mate. While much of this speculation occurs after the nomination has been decided (Alter 2004; Feldmann 2004; Kennedy 2004; Lehigh 2004; Starr 2004), speculation about the 2008 selections had begun as early as 2007 (Cain 2007; Klein 2007; Mackowiak 2007; Sanderson 2007). Most are grounded in a good understanding of what presidential candidates look for in a running mate, but one writer has not unfairly referred to the veepstakes as a “largely fact-free parlour game” (Harding 2004).

Hide All
Abramowitz Alan I. 2004. “When Good Forecasts Go Bad: The Time-for-Change Model and the 2004 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics 37 (October): 745–6.
Alter Jonathan. 2004. “Between the Lines, Online: With Kerry In, Let the Veepstakes Begin.” Newsweek (Web Exclusive), March 2.
Atkinson Danny M. 1982. “The Electoral Significance of the Vice Presidency.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 12: 330–6.
Barone Michael, and Cohen Richard E.. 2005. The Almanac of American Politics, 2006. Washington, D.C.: National Journal Group.
Baumgartner Jody. 2006a. “The Second-best Choice? Vice-presidential Candidate Qualifications in the Traditional and Modern Eras.” White House Studies 6: 179–95.
Baumgartner Jody. 2006b. The American Vice Presidency Reconsidered. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Brewer Brook. 2005. “Nominations and Conventions.” In Divided States of America: The Slash and Burn Politics of the 2004 Presidential Election, ed. Sabato Larry J.. New York: Longman.
Bryce James. 1893. The American Commonwealth. Volume 2. New York: Macmillan.
Burden Barry C. 2005. “The Nominations: Technology, Money, and Transferable Momentum.” In The Elections of 2004, ed. Nelson Michael. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
Cain Herman. 2007. “Let the Veepstakes Begin.”, February 26.
Campbell James E. 1996. “Polls and Votes: The Trial-Heat Presidential Election Forecasting Model, Certainty, and Political Campaigns.” American Politics Quarterly 24 (4): 408–33.
Campbell James E., and Garand James C., eds. 2000. Before the Vote: Forecasting American National Elections. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Ceaser James W., and Busch Andrew E.. 1997. Losing to Win: The 1996 Elections and American Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Ceaser James W., and Busch Andrew E.. 2001. The Perfect Tie: The True Story of the 2000 Presidential Election. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Ceaser James W., and Busch Andrew E.. 2005. Red Over Blue: The 2004 Elections and American Politics. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Dudley Robert L., and Rapoport Ronald B.. 1989. “Vice-Presidential Candidates and the Home State Advantage: Playing Second Banana at Home and on the Road.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (2): 537–40.
Feldmann Linda. 2004. “Veepstakes: Who Will Be No. 2?” Christian Science Monitor, March 4, USA Section, 1.
Fiedler Tom. 2002. “Introduction: The Encore of Key Largo.” In Overtime: The Election 2000 Thriller, ed. Sabato Larry J.. New York: Longman.
Garraty John A., and Carnes Mark C., eds. 1999. American National Biography. New York: Oxford.
Goldstein Joel K. 1982. The Modern American Vice Presidency: The Transformation of a Political Institution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Greene William H. 2003. Econometric Analysis. 5thed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Harding James. 2004. “Voters Weigh up Kerry by the Company He Keeps: Speculation on the Democrat's Likely Running Mate Is Rife.” Financial Times, May 20.
Hatfield Mark O. 1997. Vice Presidents of the United States, 1789–1993. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Holbrook Thomas M. 1994. “The Behavioral Consequences of Vice Presidential Debates: Does the Undercard Have Any Punch?American Politics Quarterly 22 (October): 469–82.
Holbrook Thomas M. 1996. “Reading the Political Tea Leaves: A Forecasting Model of Contemporary Presidential Elections.” American Politics Quarterly 24 (4): 506–19.
Keefe William J., and Hetherington Marc J.. 2003. Parties, Politics, and Public Policy in America. 9thed. Washington, D.C.: CQ Press.
Kennedy Helen. 2004. “Edwards in Veep End of Kerry Search Pool.” Daily News, March 4, 4.
King Gary, and Zeng Langche. 2001. “Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data.” Political Analysis 9 (2): 137–63.
Klein Rick. 2007. “Never Too Early for the Veepstakes Race.” ABC News Online, June 12.
Lehigh Scot. 2004. “As Kerry Mulls the Veepstakes.” The Boston Globe, July 2, A21.
Lewis-Beck Michael S., and Tien Charles. 2000. “The Future in Forecasting: Prospective Presidential Models.” In Before the Vote: Forecasting American National Elections, ed. Campbell James E. and Garand James C.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Light Paul C. 1984. Vice-Presidential Power: Advice and Influence in the White House. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University.
Lockerbie Brad. 2004. “A Look to the Future: Forecasting the 2004 Presidential Election.” PS: Political Science and Politics 37 (October): 741–3.
Mackowiak Matt. 2007. “Veepstakes: The Contenders.”, February 5.
Mayer William G. 2000. “A Brief History of Vice Presidential Selection.” In In Pursuit of the White House 2000: How We Choose Our Presidential Nominees, ed. Mayer William G.. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Mayer William G. 2008. “Handicapping the 2008 Nomination Races: An Early Winter Prospectus.” The Forum 5 (4).
McFadden Daniel. 1974. “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior.” In Frontiers in Econometrics, ed. Zarembka Paul. New York: Academic Press.
Miller Center Commission. 1992. “Report of the Commission on Choosing and Using Vice Presidents.” Miller Center of Public Affairs, University of Virginia.
Mitchell Alison, and Brunei Frank. 2000. “The 2000 Campaign: the Arizona Senator. McCain Said to Be Willing To Run as Bush's No. 2.” New York Times, July 21.
Nelson Michael. 1988. A Heartbeat Away. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.
Nelson Michael. 1997. “The Election: Turbulence and Tranquility in Contemporary American Politics.” In The Elections of 1996, ed. Nelson Michael. Washington, D.C.: Congress Quarterly.
Nelson Michael, ed. 2005. The Elections of 2004. Washington D.C.: CQ Press.
Norpoth Helmut. 2004. “From Primary to General Election: A Forecast of the Presidential Vote.” PS: Political Science and Politics 37 (October): 737–40.
Polsby Nelson W., and Wildavsky Aaron. 2004. Presidential Elections: Strategies and Structures in American Politics. 11thed. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
Romero David W. 2001. “Requiem for a Lightweight: Vice Presidential Candidate Evaluations and the Presidential Vote.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 31 (3): 454–63.
Sanderson Matthew T. 2007. “Money Adds New Dimension to ‘Veepstakes.’”, December 5.
Sigelman Lee, and Wahlbeck Paul J.. 1997. “The ‘Veepstakes’: Strategic Choice in Presidential Running Mate Selection.” American Political Science Review 91 (December): 855–64.
Singular Stephen. 2000. Joe Lieberman: The Historic Choice. New York: Pinnacle.
Starr Alexandra. 2004. “The Strategy Behind Kerry's Veepstakes.” Business Week, March 15, 45.
Thomas Evan. 2005. Election 2004: How Bush Won and What You Can Expect in the Future. New York: Public Affairs.
Watson Robert P., and Yon Richard M.. 2006. “Vice Presidential Selection in the Modern Era.” White House Studies 6: 163–78.
Wayne Stephen J. 2004. The Road to the White House, 2004: The Politics of Presidential Elections. New York: Thomson Wadsworth.
White Theodore H. 1961. The Making of the President, 1960. New York: Atheneum.
Who's Who in America. 1940 et seq. Chicago: A.N. Marquis.
Wlezien Christopher, and Erikson Robert S.. 2000. “Temporal Horizons and Presidential Election Forecasts.” In Before the Vote: Forecasting American National Elections, ed. Campbell James E. and Garand James C.. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Woodward Bob. 1996. The Choice. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 2
Total number of PDF views: 6 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 88 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.