Skip to main content

We Are All Social Scientists Now: How Big Data, Machine Learning, and Causal Inference Work Together

  • Justin Grimmer (a1)
Hide All
Adler, E. Scott, and Wilkerson, John. 2014. “Congressional Bills Project.” Available Accessed August 1, 2014.
Bond, Robert, and Messing, Solomon. “Quantifying Social Media’s Political Space: Estimating Ideology from Publicly Revealed Preferences on Facebook.” Stanford University Unpublished Manuscript.
Bonica, Adam. 2014. “Mapping the Ideological Marketplace.” American Journal of Political Science 58 (2): 367–87.
Boydstun, Amber. 2013. Making the News: Politics, the Media, and Agenda Setting. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Chang, Jonathan, Boyd-Graber, Jordan, Gerrish, Sean, Wang, Chong, and Blei, David. 2009. “Reading Tea Leaves: How Humans Interpret Topic Models.” In Neural Information Processing Systems Proceedings, 288–96.
Clinton, Joshua D., and Jackman, Simon. 2009. “To Simulate or NOMINATE?Legislative Studies Quarterly 34 (4): 593621.
Clinton, Joshua, Jackman, Simon, and Rivers, Douglas. 2004. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data.” American Political Science Review 98 (02): 355–70.
Davenport, Lauren. 2014. “Politics between Black and White.” Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Unpublished Manuscript.
Fowler, James H., Heaney, Michael T., Nickerson, David W., Padgett, John F., and Betsy, Sinclair. 2011. “Causality in Political Networks.” American Politics Research 2: 437–80.
Gerring, John. 2012. “Mere Description.” British Journal of Political Science 42 (4): 721–46.
Green, Donald P., and Kern, Holger L.. 2012. “Modeling Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Survey Experiments with Bayesian Additive Regression Trees.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76 (3): 491511.
Grimmer, Justin, and Stewart, Brandon M.. 2013. “Text as Data: The Promise and Pitfalls of Automatic Content Analysis Methods for Political Texts.” Political Analysis 21 (3): 267– 97.
Hazlett, Chad. 2014. “Kernel Balancing (KBAL): A Balancing Method to Equalize Multivariate Distance Densities and Reduce Bias without a Specification Search.” Cambridge, MA: MIT Unpublished Manuscript.
Higgins, Michael J., and Sekhon, Jasjeet S.. 2014. “Improving Experiments by Optimal Blocking: Minimizing the Maximum Within-Block Distance.” Berkeley: University of California Unpublished Manuscript.
Ho, Dan, Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Stuart, Elizabeth. 2007. “Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference.” Political Analysis 15 (3): 199236.
Imai, Kosuke, King, Gary, and Stuart, Elizabeth. 2008. “Misunderstandings between Experimentalists and Observationalists about Causal Inference.” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society) 171 (2): 481502.
Imai, Kosuke, and Ratkovic, Marc. 2013. “Estimating Treatment Effect Heterogeneity in Randomized Program Evaluation.” Annals of Applied Statistics 7 (1): 443–70.
Jones, Bryan, Wilkerson, John, and Baumgartner, Frank. 2009. “The Policy Agendas Project.” Available at Accessed August 1, 2014.
Krehbiel, Keith. 1998. Pivotal Politics: A Theory of US Lawmaking. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Lee, David, Moretti, Enrico, and Butler, Matthew. 2004. “Do Voters Affect or Elect Policies? Evidence from the US House.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 119 (3): 807–59.
Lee, Frances. 2008. “Dividers, Not Uniters: Presidential Leadership and Senate Partisanship, 1981–2004.” Journal of Politics 70 (4): 914–28.
McCarty, Nolan, Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 2006. Polarized America: The Dance of Inequality and Unequal Riches. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
McCarty, NolanKeith, PooleHoward, Rosenthal. 2009. “Does Gerrymandering Cause Polarization?American Journal of Political Science 53 (3): 666–80.
Monroe, Burt L., Jennifer, Pan, Margaret E., Roberts, Maya, Sen, and Betsy, Sinclair. 2015. “No! Formal Theory, Causal Inference, and Big Data Are Not Contradictory Trends in Political Science.” PS: Political Science and Politics 48 (1): this issue.
Moore, Ryan T., and Moore, Sally A.. 2013. “Blocking for Sequential Political Experiments.” Political Analysis 21 (4): 507–23.
Nagler, Jonathan, and Tucker, Joshua. 2015. “Drawing Inferences and Testing Theories with Big Data.” PS: Political Science and Politics 48 (1): this issue.
Patty, John, and Penn, Elizabeth Maggie. 2015. “Analyzing Big Data: Social Choice and Measurement.” PS: Political Science and Politics 48 (1): this issue.
Poole, Keith. 1984. “Least Squares Metric, Unidimensional Unfolding.” Psychometrika 49 (3): 311–23.
Poole, Keith, and Rosenthal, Howard. 1984. “The Polarization of American Politics.” Journal of Politics 46 (4): 1061–79.
Poole, KeithHoward, Rosenthal. 1985. “A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (2): 357–84.
Poole, KeithHoward, Rosenthal. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Quinn, Kevinet al. 2010. “How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (1): 209–27.
Roberts, Margaret al. 2014. “Structural Topic Models for Open-Ended Survey Responses.” American Journal of Political Science. DOI 10.1111/ajps.12103.
Rosenbaum, Paul R., and Rubin, Donald R.. 1983. “The Central Role of the Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects.” Biometrika 70 (1): 4155.
Sekhon, Jasjeet S. 2009. “Opiates for the Matches: Matching Methods for Causal Inference.” Annual Review of Political Science 12: 487508.
Theriault, Sean M. 2008. Party Polarization in Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed