Skip to main content Accessibility help

What Can We Learn About the Ideology of the Newest Supreme Court Justices?

  • Stephen A. Jessee (a1) and Alexander M. Tahk (a2)

In this article, we present a principled method for updating estimates of the ideology of Supreme Court justices based on each new vote they cast. We apply this method to the ideological positions of the newly appointed members of the Court: John Roberts, Samuel Alito, and Sonia Sotomayor. This approach allows us to gain not only an estimate of justices' ideologies but also a greater understanding of the level of uncertainty we should have about these values, including how much we can learn about a new justice's views after he or she has cast a given number of votes on the Court.

Hide All
Bailey, Michael A. 2007. “Comparable Preference Estimates across Time and Institutions for the Court, Congress, and Presidency.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (3): 433–48.
Clinton, Joshua, Jackman, Simon, and Rivers, Douglas. 2004. “The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data.” American Political Science Review 98 (2): 355–70.
Epstein, Lee, Martin, Andrew D., Segal, Jeffrey A., and Westerland, Chad. 2007. “The Judicial Common Space.” Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 23 (2): 303–25.
Heckman, James J., and Snyder, James M. Jr. 1997. “Linear Probability Models of the Demand for Attributes with an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators.” RAND Journal of Economics 28: S142S189.
Martin, Andrew D., and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2002. “Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999.” Political Analysis 10 (2): 134–53.
Plummer, Martyn. 2003. “JAGS: A Program for Analysis of Bayesian Graphical Models Using Gibbs Sampling.” In Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical Computing, ed. Hornik, Kurt, Leisch, Friedrich, and Zeileis, Achim, 2022. Vienna: Technische Universität Wien.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1985. “A Spatial Model for Legislative Roll Call Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 29 (2): 357–84.
Poole, Keith T., and Rosenthal, Howard. 1997. Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting. New York: Oxford University Press.
Rasch, Georg. 1960. Probabilistic Models for Some Intelligence and Attainment Tests. Copenhagen: Danmarks Paedogogiske Institut.
Rasch, Georg. 1966. “An Item Analysis which Takes Individual Differences into Account.” British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 19 (1): 4957.
Rivers, Douglas. 2003. “Identification of Multidimensional Spatial Voting Models.” Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
Ruger, Theodore W., Kim, Pauline T., Martin, Andrew D., and Quinn, Kevin M.. 2004. “The Supreme Court Forecasting Project: Legal and Political Science Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decisionmaking.” Columbia Law Review 104 (4): 1,150–210.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Segal, Jeffrey A., and Spaeth, Harold J.. 2002. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model Revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spaeth, Harold J., Epstein, Lee, Ruger, Ted, Whittington, Keith, Segal, Jeffrey A., and Martin, Andrew D.. 2010. “Supreme Court Database.”
Stene, Jon. 1968. “Introduction to the Rasch Theory of Psychological Measurement.” In Psychologische Testtheorie, ed. Fischer, Gerhard H., 229–68. Bern: Hans Huber.
Washington Post/Morningside Partners/FDCH. 2005. Transcript: Day Two of the Roberts Confirmation Hearings. 2005. Washington Post, September 13.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed