Skip to main content

Who Wants to Have a Tea Party? The Who, What, and Why of the Tea Party Movement

  • Kevin Arceneaux (a1) and Stephen P. Nicholson (a2)

In the wake of the 2008 election, disgruntled conservatives organized opposition to President Obama's policies under a new movement dubbed the Tea Party. As an emerging force in American politics, we seek to understand who supports the Tea Party and the political attitudes these individuals hold. Using a nationally representative survey of respondents during the 2010 midterm elections, we examine whether the emerging narrative surrounding the Tea Party is accurate. The survey included a novel embedded experiment designed to investigate claims that animosity toward racial minorities drives Tea Party opposition to welfare. We find support for the contention that the Tea Party is predominately white, male, conservative, and strongly opposed to tax increases. Tea Party supporters, however, are not simply libertarians. In spite of appeals to freedom and liberty common in Tea Party rhetoric, a strong authoritarian pulse exists among its most ardent supporters. Furthermore, although we find evidence that racial resentment colors Tea Party members' judgments about government aid to the poor, racial animus does not appear to be the primary force behind their opposition to government aid. Lastly, we uncover some evidence of heterogeneity within the movement, with a small minority of Tea Party supporters voicing less-extreme political attitudes and evincing a rejection of negative racial stereotypes.

Hide All
Ansolabehere Stephen, and Schaffner Brian F.. 2011. Re-Examining the Validity of Different Survey Modes for Measuring Public Opinion in the U.S.: Findings from a 2010 Multi-Mode Comparison. Working paper.
Barreto Matt, Cooper Betsy L., Gonzalez Benjamin, Parker Christopher S., and Towler Christopher. 2011. “The Tea Party in the Age of Obama: Mainstream Conservatism or Out-Group Anxiety?Political Power and Social Theory 22 (1): 105–37.
Blanz Volker, and Vetter Thomas. 1999. “A Morphable Model for the Synthesis of 3D Faces.” In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques, 187–94.
Brader Ted, Valentino Nicholas A., and Suhay Elizabeth. 2008. “What Triggers Public Opposition to Immigration? Anxiety, Group Cues, and Immigration Threat.” American Journal of Political Science 52 (4): 959–78.
Edsall Thomas Byrne, and Edsall Mary D.. 1991. Chain Reaction: The Impact of Race, Rights, and Taxes on American Politics. New York: Norton.
Farber David. 2010. The Rise and Fall of Modern American Conservatism: A Short History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Frank Thomas. 2004. What's the Matter with Kansas: How Conservatives Won the Heart of America. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Gilens Martin. 2000. Why Americans Hate Welfare: Race, Media, and the Politics of Antipoverty Policy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Glenn Brian J., and Teles Steven M., eds. 2009. Conservatism and American Political Development. New York: Oxford University Press.
Hofstadter Richard. 1965. The Paranoid Style in American Politics. New York: Vintage.
Karpowitz Christopher F., Monson J. Quin, Patterson Kelly D., and Pope Jeremy C.. 2011. “Tea Time in America? The Impact of the Tea Party Movement on the 2010 Midterm Election.” PS: Political Science & Politics 44 (2): 303–09.
Kinder Donald R., and Sanders Lynn M.. 1996. Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kuklinski James H., Sniderman Paul M., Knight Kathleen, Piazza Thomas, Tetlock Philip E., Lawrence Gordon, and Mellers Barbara. 1997. “Racial Prejudice and Attitudes toward Affirmative Action.” American Journal of Political Science 41: 402–19.
Lakoff George. 2009. “Empathy, Sotomayor, and Democracy: The Conservative Stealth Strategy.” Huffington Post: [posted May 30; accessed April 7, 2011].
Malhotra Neil, and Krosnick Jon A.. 2007. “The Effect of Survey Mode and Sampling on Inferences about Political Attitudes and Behavior: Comparing the 2000 and 2004 ANES to Internet Surveys with Nonprobability Samples.” Political Analysis 15 (3): 286323.
McClosky Herbert, and Zaller John. 1984. The American Ethos: Public Attitudes toward Capitalism and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Parker Christopher. 2010. “2010 Multi-State Survey of Race and Politics.” University of Washington Institute for the Study of Ethnicity, Race, and Sexuality.
Parker Christopher S., and Barreto Matt A.. forthcoming. The Paranoid Style Revisited: Support for the Tea Party and Contemporary American Politics.
Petersen Michael Bang, Slothuus Rune, Stubager Rune, and Togeby Lise. 2010. “Deservingness versus Values in Public Opinion on Welfare: The Automaticity of the Deservingness Heuristic.” European Journal of Political Research 50 (1): 2452.
Raban Jonathan. 2010. “At the Tea Party.” The New York Review of Books: March 25.
Schwartz Joseph M. 2009. The Future of Democratic Equality: Rebuilding Social Solidarity in a Fragmented America. New York: Routledge.
Sears David O., and Henry P. J.. 2005. “Over Thirty Years Later: A Contemporary Look at Symbolic Racism.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 37: 95150.
Singular Inversions. 2006. FaceGen 3.1 Full SDK Documentation.
Sniderman Paul M., and Carmines Edward G.. 1997. Reaching Beyond Race. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Todorov Alexander, Said Chris P., Egnell Andrew D., and Oosterhof Nikolaas N.. 2008. “Understanding Evaluation of Faces on Social Dimensions.” Trends in Cognitive Science 12 (12): 455–60.
Uhlmann Eric Luis, Poehlman T. Andrew, and Bargh John A.. 2009. “American Moral Exceptionalism.” In Social and Psychological Bases of Ideology and System Justification, ed. Jost John T., Kay Aaron C., and Thorisdottir Hulda, 2752. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williamson Vanessa, Skocpol Theda, and Coggin John. 2011. “The Tea Party and the Remaking of Republican Conservatism.” Perspectives on Politics 9 (1): 2543.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

PS: Political Science & Politics
  • ISSN: 1049-0965
  • EISSN: 1537-5935
  • URL: /core/journals/ps-political-science-and-politics
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 32
Total number of PDF views: 161 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 516 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 16th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.