Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Risk management in UK mental health services: an overvalued idea?

  • Edward Petch (a1)
  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Risk management in UK mental health services: an overvalued idea?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Risk management in UK mental health services: an overvalued idea?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Risk management in UK mental health services: an overvalued idea?
      Available formats
      ×
Abstract
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
Hide All
Department of Health & Home Office (1999) Managing Dangerous People with Severe Personality Disorder: Proposals for Policy Development. London: Department of Health.
Department of Health & Home Office (2000a) Report of the Review of Security at the High Security Hospitals. London: Department of Health.
Department of Health & Home Office (2000b) The NHS Plan. London: The Stationery Office.
Davies, S., Amos, T. & Appleby, L. (2001) How much risk training takes place in mental health services? A national survey of training and policies. Psychiatric Bulletin, 25, 217219.
Eastman, N. (1997) The Mental Health (Patients in the Community) Act 1995. A clinical analysis. British Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 492496.
Eastman, N. (1999) Public health psychiatry or crime prevention? British Medical Journal, 318, 549551.
Grounds, A. (1996) Forensic psychiatry for the millennium. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry, 7, 221227.
Health Select Committee (2000) Provision of NHS Mental Health Services (Fourth Report). London: The Stationery Office.
Holloway, F. (1996) Community psychiatric care: from libertarianism to coercion. ‘Moral Panic’ and mental health policy in Britain. Health Care Analysis, 4, 235243.
Holloway, F. (1997) The assessment and management of risk in psychiatry: can we do better? Psychiatric Bulletin, 21, 283285.
Menzies, R., Webster, C., McMain, S., et al (1994) The dimensions of dangerousness revisited: assessing forensic predictions about violence. Law and Human Behaviour, 18, 128.
Monahan, J. & Steadman, H. (1996) Toward a rejuvenation of risk assessment research. In Violence and Mental Disorder (eds Monahan, J. & Steadman, H.), pp. 117. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Morris, R., Gask, L., Battersby, L., et al (1999) Teaching frontline health and voluntary workers to assess and manage suicidal patients. Journal of Affective Disorders, 318, 7783.
Mullen, P. E. (1999) Dangerous people with severe personality disorder. British proposals for managing them are glaringly wrong and unethical. British Medical Journal, 319, 11461147.
Mullen, P. E. (2000) Forensic mental health. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 307311.
Munro, E. & Rumgay, J. (2000) Role of risk assessment in reducing homicides by people with mental illness. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 116120.
Snowden, P. (1997) Practical aspects of clinical risk assessment and management. British Journal of Psychiatry, 170 (suppl. 32), 3234.
Soyka, M. (2000) Substance misuse, psychiatric disorder and violent and disturbed behaviour. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 345350.
Steadman, H., Monahan, J., Appelbaum, P., et al (1996) Designing a new generation of risk assessment research. In Violence and Mental Disorder (eds Monahan, J. & Steadman, H.), pp. 297318. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Szmukler, G. (2000) Homicide inquiries. What sense do they make? Psychiatric Bulletin, 24, 610.
Taylor, P. J. & Gunn, J. (1999) Homicides by people with mental illness: myth and reality. British Journal of Psychiatry, 174, 914.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

BJPsych Bulletin
  • ISSN: 0955-6036
  • EISSN: 1472-1473
  • URL: /core/journals/bjpsych-bulletin
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 1
Total number of PDF views: 30 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 184 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 2nd January 2018 - 17th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Risk management in UK mental health services: an overvalued idea?

  • Edward Petch (a1)
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *