Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Standardised risk assessment: why all the fuss?

  • Anthony Maden (a1)
  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Standardised risk assessment: why all the fuss?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Standardised risk assessment: why all the fuss?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Standardised risk assessment: why all the fuss?
      Available formats
      ×
Abstract
Copyright
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
References
Hide All
Hare, R. (1991) The Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised. Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.
Harris, G., Rice, M. & Quinsey, V. (1993) Violent recidivism of mentally disordered offenders. The development of a statistical prediction instrument. Criminal Justice and Behaviour, 20, 315.
Monahan, J., Steadman, H. J., Silver, E., et al (2001) Rethinking Risk Assessment. The MacArthur Study of Mental Disorder and Violence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Quinsey, V., Harris, G., Rice, M., et al (1998) Violent Offenders: Appraising and Managing Risk. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Rice, M. E. & Harris, G.T. (1997) Cross validation and extension of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide for child molesters and rapists. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 231241.
Webster, C., Douglas, K., Eaves, D., et al (1995) HCR–20 Assessing Risk for Violence (Version 2). Vancouver: Simon Fraser University.
Wong, S. & Gordon, A. (2000) Violence Risk Scale. Saskatoon: Regional Psychiatric Centre.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

BJPsych Bulletin
  • ISSN: 0955-6036
  • EISSN: 1472-1473
  • URL: /core/journals/bjpsych-bulletin
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 26 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 90 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 2nd January 2018 - 18th July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Standardised risk assessment: why all the fuss?

  • Anthony Maden (a1)
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.

×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *