Hostname: page-component-5db58dd55d-smskv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2026-06-07T10:46:04.761Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison of self-ratings with informant-ratings of pre-morbid personality on two personality rating scales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

David Dodwell
David Dodwell*
Affiliation:
From the University Department of Neurology, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr David Dodwell, University Department of Psychiatry, Rawnsley Building, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9WL.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

In a study of pre-morbid personality in 56 head-injured subjects, subjects' self-ratings of pre-morbid personality were compared with informants' ratings of the subjects' pre-morbid personality on two personality questionnaires (the Eysenck Personality Inventory (EPI) and the Marke-Nyman Temperament Scale (MNTS)). Correlations between self-ratings and informantratings were positive and significant for all three MNTS and for EPI Extraversion and Lie scales, but not for EPI Neuroticism, where the lack of subject-informant correlation was attributed to contamination of the self-rating of the trait measure by current abnormalities of mental state. Further analyses supported previous evidence that the MNTS ‘Validity’ scale may predict the development of psychiatric symptoms.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , May 1988 , pp. 495 - 501
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

American Psychiatric Association (1980). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. Third EditionAmerican Psychiatric Association: Washington D.C.Google Scholar
Barrett, J. E. (1972). Use of the M-N-T inventory (Sjobring personality dimensions) on an American population. Ada Psychiatrica Scandinavica 48, 501–509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bem, D. J. & Allen, A. (1974). On predicting some of the people some of the time, the search for cross-situational consistencies in behaviour. Psychological Review 81, 506–520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bendig, A. W. (1959). Score reliability of dichotomous and trichotomous item responses on the Maudsley Personality Inventory. Journal of Consulting Psychology 23, 181.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement 20, 37–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppen, A. & Metcalfe, M. (1965). Effect of a depressive illness on M.P.I, scores. British Journal of Psychiatry 111, 236–239CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, P. T. & McCrae, R. R. (1980). Influence of Extraversion and Neuroticism on subjective well-being: happy and unhappy people. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38, 668–678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R. & Arenberg, D. (1980). Enduring dispositions in adult males Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38, 793–800.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crandall, R. (1976). Validation of self-report measures using ratings by others. Sociological Methods & Research 4, 380–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diem, K. & Lentner, C. (eds.) (1970). Scientific Tablets. J. R. Geigy: Basle.Google Scholar
Dodwell, D. J. F. (1986). Neuropsychological and Psychiatric Disorders following Head Injury. M.D. thesis, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1963) EPI Form B Hodder & Stoughton Educational: Sevenoaks, KentGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. & Eysenck, S. B. G. (1964). Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory. University of London Press: London.Google Scholar
Eysenck, S. B. G. (1962). The validity of a personality questionnaire as determined by the method of nominated groups. Life Sciences 1, 13–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirschfeld, R. M. A. & Klerman, G. L. (1979). Personality attributes and affective disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry 136, 67–70Google ScholarPubMed
Hirschfeld, R. M. A., Klerman, G L., Clayton, P. J., Keller, M. B., McDonald-Scott, P. & Larkin, B. H. (1983). Assessing personality: effects of the depressive state on trait measurement. American Journal of Psychiatry 140, 695–699.Google ScholarPubMed
Katz, R. & McGuffin, P (1987). Neuroticism in familial depression. Psychological Medicine 17, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelvin, R. P., Lucas, C. J. & Ojha, A. B. (1965). The relation between personality, mental health and academic performance in university students. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 4, 244–253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendell, R. E. & DiScipio, W J. (1968). Eysenck Personality Inventory scores of patients with depressive illness. British Journal of Psychiatry 114, 767–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirton, M. (1977). Characteristics of high he scorers. Psychological Reports 40, 279–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knowles, J. B. & Kreitman, N. (1965). The Eysenck Personality Inventory, some considerations. British Journal of Psychiatry 111, 755–759.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindegard, B. & Nystrom, S. (1969). A prospective study of adult male psychiatric in and out-patients in a Swedish urban population. Ada Socio-medica Scandinavica 1, 19–31.Google Scholar
Lindegard, B. & Nystrom, S. (1970). Predisposition for mental illness – a prospective study of adult male psychiatric in - and out-patients in a Swedish urban population. Ada Socio-medica Scandinavica 2, 1–22Google Scholar
Miller, H. (1961). Accident neurosis. British Medical Journal i, 919–925 & 992–998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nile, N. H., Hull, C. H., Jenkins, J. G., Steinbrenner, K. & Bent, D. H. (1975). SPSS – Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. McGraw-Hill: New York.Google Scholar
Nyman, G. E. & Marke, S. (1962) Sjobring's differential psychology. English Summary. In Sjobrings Differenliella Psykologi. Analys Och Skalkonstruktion, pp 92–99. Gleerups: Stockholm.Google Scholar
Office of Population Censuses and Surveys. (1980). Classification of Occupations. Her Majesty's Stationery Office: London.Google Scholar
Ojha, A. B., Kelvin, R. P. & Lucas, C. J. (1966). The use of the Maudsley Personality Inventory on university students. British Journal of Psychiatry 112, 543–548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Remington, M. & Tyrer, P. (1979). The Social Functioning Schedule – a brief semi-structured interview. Social Psychiatry 14, 151–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, W. R. (1971). The Traumatic Amnesias. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Sundqvist, U. B. (1973). Academic performance and mental health in university students. Acta Psychiatnca Scandinavica Supplementum 239.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. E. & Sartorius, N. (1974). The Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms. Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K & Sturt, E. (1978). The PSE-1D-CATEGO System – Supplementary Manual. Medical Research Council: MRC Social Psychiatry Unit, London.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. (1978). Mental Disorders: glossary and guide to their classification in accordance with the Ninth Revision of the International Classification of Diseases. World Health Organization: Geneva.Google Scholar
von Zerssen, D. (1982) Personality and affective disorders. In Handbook of Affective Disorders (ed Paykel, E. S.), pp. 212228. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh.Google Scholar