Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-ffbbcc459-llqpl Total loading time: 0.189 Render date: 2022-03-13T05:22:59.764Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }
  • English
Psychological Medicine Psychological Medicine

Article contents

The reliability and validity of PSE assessments by lay interviewers: a national population survey

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Bryan Rodgers  and
Sheila A. Mann
Bryan Rodgers*
Affiliation:
MRC National Survey of Health and Development, Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Bristol
Sheila A. Mann
Affiliation:
MRC National Survey of Health and Development, Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Bristol
*
1Address for correspondence: Bryan Rodgers, MRC National Survey of Health and Development, University of Bristol, Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, Canynge Hall, Whiteladies Road, Bristol BS8 2PR.
Get access Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

Studies employing psychiatric rating instruments administered by lay interviewers need to demonstrate the reliability and validity of subject classification. In a national population study utilizing the short form of the Present State Examination, audiotapes of interviews were used to demonstrate the reliability of ratings. The classification of ‘cases’ was found to be related to self-reports of nervous trouble and help–seeking for such problems. Associations between the rate of psychiatric disorder and demographic factors were similar to those found in previous community surveys. In general, the method of psychiatric assessment was considered to be satisfactory. Recommendations are made for the monitoring of interviews in similar large-scale investigations.

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , August 1986 , pp. 689 - 700
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anastasi, A. (1982). Psychological Testing (5th edn). Macmillan: New York.Google Scholar
Atkins, E., Cherry, N., Douglas, J. W. B., Kiernan, K. E. & Wadsworth, M. E. J. (1981). The 1946 British birth cohort: an account of the origins, progress and results of the National Survey of Health and Development. In Prospective Longitudinal Research: An Empirical Basis for the Primary Prevention of Psychosocial Disorders (ed. Mednick, S. A. and Baert, A. E.), pp. 25–30. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Bebbington, P., Hurry, J., Tennant, C., Sturt, E. & Wing, J. K. (1981). Epidemiology of mental disorders in Camberwell. Psychological Medicine 11, 561–579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, G. W. & Harris, T. (1978). Social Origins of Depression. Tavistock: London.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. E., Copeland, J. R. M., Brown, G. W., Harris, T. & Gourlay, A. J. (1977). Further studies on interviewer training and inter-rater reliability of the Present State Examination (PSE). Psychological Medicine 7, 517–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copeland, J. R. M., Kelleher, M. J., Gourlay, A. J. & Smith, A. M. R. (1975). Influence of psychiatric training, medical qualification, and paramedical training on the rating of abnormal behaviour. Psychological Medicine 5, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cranach, M. von & Cooper, J. E. (1972). Changes in rating behaviour during the learning of a standardized psychiatric interview. Psychological Medicine 2, 373–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dean, C., Surtees, P. G. & Sashidharan, S. P. (1983). Comparison of research diagnostic systems in an Edinburgh community sample. British Journal of Psychiatry 142, 247–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endicott, J. & Spitzer, R. L. (1978). A diagnostic interview; the schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry 35, 837–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, D. P. (1972). The Detection of Psychiatric Illness by Questionnaire. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Hagnell, O. (1970). Incidence and duration of episodes of mental illness in a total population. In Psychiatric Epidemiology (ed. Hare, E. H. and Wing, J. K.), pp. 213–224. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Hare, E. H. & Shaw, G. K. (1965). Mental Health on a New Housing Estate. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Maxwell, A. E. (1977). Coefficients of agreement between observers and their interpretation. British Journal of Psychiatry 130, 79–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGee, R., Williams, S., Kashani, J. H. & Silva, P. A. (1983). Prevalence of self-reported depressive symptoms and associated social factors in mothers in Dunedin. British Journal of Psychiatry 143, 473–479.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rutter, M., Tizard, J. & Whitmore, K. (1970). Education, Health and Behaviour. Longman: London.Google Scholar
Shepherd, M., Cooper, B., Brown, A. C. & Kalton, G. W. (1966). Psychiatric Illness in General Practice. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Sturt, E., Bebbington, P., Hurry, J. & Tennant, C. (1981). The Present State Examination used by interviewers from a Survey Agency: report from the MRC Camberwell Community Survey. Psychological Medicine 11, 185–192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Surtees, P. G., Dean, C., Ingham, J. G., Kreitman, N. B., Miller, P. McC. & Sashidharan, S. P. (1983). Psychiatric disorder in women from an Edinburgh community: associations with demographic factors. British Journal of Psychiatry 142, 238–246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weissman, M. M. & Myers, J. K. (1978). Rates and risks of depressive symptoms in a United States urban community. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 57, 219–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wing, J. K. & Sturt, E. (1978). The PSE-lD–CATEGO System: Supplementary Manual, Institute of Psychiatry (mimeo): London.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. E. & Sartorius, N. (1974 a). The Measurement and Classification of Psychiatric Symptoms. Cambridge University Press: London.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K., Cooper, J. E. & Sartorius, N. (1974 b). Present State Examination. Cambridge University Press: London.Google Scholar
Wing, J. K., Nixon, J. M., Mann, S. A. & Leff, J. P. (1977). Reliability of the PSE (ninth edition) used in a population study. Psychological Medicine 7, 505–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The reliability and validity of PSE assessments by lay interviewers: a national population survey
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The reliability and validity of PSE assessments by lay interviewers: a national population survey
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The reliability and validity of PSE assessments by lay interviewers: a national population survey
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *