Hanson, R. Karl 2017. Assessing the Calibration of Actuarial Risk Scales. Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 44, Issue. 1, p. 26.
Bui, Laura Ullrich, Simone and Coid, Jeremy W. 2016. Screening for mental disorder using the UK national offender assessment system. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, Vol. 27, Issue. 6, p. 786.
Gray, Nicola S. and Snowden, Robert J. 2016. Psychopathy in women: Prediction of criminality and violence in UK and USA psychiatric patients resident in the community. Psychiatry Research, Vol. 237, p. 339.
Kivisto, Aaron J. 2016. Violence Risk Assessment and Management in Outpatient Clinical Practice. Journal of Clinical Psychology, Vol. 72, Issue. 4, p. 329.
Kroner, Daryl G. and Quillen, Maranda 2016. The Handbook of Measurement Issues in Criminology and Criminal Justice.
Pouls, Claudia and Jeandarme, Inge 2016. Predicting Institutional Aggression in Offenders with Intellectual Disabilities Using the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities,
van Heesch, Ben Jeandarme, Inge Pouls, Claudia and Vervaeke, Geert 2016. Validity and reliability of the VRAG in a forensic psychiatric medium security population in Flanders. Psychology, Crime & Law, Vol. 22, Issue. 6, p. 530.
Harris, Grant T. Lowenkamp, Christopher T. and Hilton, N. Zoe 2015. Evidence for Risk Estimate Precision: Implications for Individual Risk Communication. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, Vol. 33, Issue. 1, p. 111.
Jaber, F. S. and Mahmoud, K. F. 2015. Risk tools for the prediction of violence: ‘VRAG, HCR-20, PCL-R’. Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing, Vol. 22, Issue. 2, p. 133.
Rossegger, Astrid Endrass, Jérôme Gerth, Juliane Singh, Jay P. and Scott, James G. 2014. Replicating the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide: A Total Forensic Cohort Study. PLoS ONE, Vol. 9, Issue. 3, p. e91845.
Singh, J. P. Fazel, S. Gueorguieva, R. and Buchanan, A. 2014. Rates of violence in patients classified as high risk by structured risk assessment instruments. The British Journal of Psychiatry, Vol. 204, Issue. 3, p. 180.
2014. Forensic Psychiatry.
Helmus, Leslie Hanson, R. Karl Thornton, David Babchishin, Kelly M. and Harris, Andrew J. R. 2012. Absolute Recidivism Rates Predicted By Static-99R and Static-2002R Sex Offender Risk Assessment Tools Vary Across Samples. Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 39, Issue. 9, p. 1148.
Newberry, Michelle and Shuker, Richard 2012. Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI) Profiles of Offenders and Their Relationship to Institutional Misconduct and Risk of Reconviction. Journal of Personality Assessment, Vol. 94, Issue. 6, p. 586.
Szmukler, G. Everitt, B. and Leese, M. 2012. Risk assessment and receiver operating characteristic curves. Psychological Medicine, Vol. 42, Issue. 05, p. 895.
Vitacco, Michael J. Gonsalves, Valerie Tomony, James Smith, Brad E. R. and Lishner, David A. 2012. Can Standardized Measures of Risk Predict Inpatient Violence?. Criminal Justice and Behavior, Vol. 39, Issue. 5, p. 589.
Gray, Nicola S. Taylor, John and Snowden, Robert J. 2011. Predicting violence using structured professional judgment in patients with different mental and behavioral disorders. Psychiatry Research, Vol. 187, Issue. 1-2, p. 248.
Nilsson, Thomas Wallinius, Märta Gustavson, Christina Anckarsäter, Henrik Kerekes, Nóra and Scott, James G. 2011. Violent Recidivism: A Long-Time Follow-Up Study of Mentally Disordered Offenders. PLoS ONE, Vol. 6, Issue. 10, p. e25768.
Singh, Jay P. Grann, Martin and Fazel, Seena 2011. A comparative study of violence risk assessment tools: A systematic review and metaregression analysis of 68 studies involving 25,980 participants. Clinical Psychology Review, Vol. 31, Issue. 3, p. 499.
Harris, Grant T. Rice, Marnie E. and Quinsey, Vernon L. 2010. Allegiance or Fidelity? A Clarifying Reply. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, Vol. 17, Issue. 1, p. 82.
Actuarial instruments may be useful in predicting long-term violence in mentally disordered patients. We compared two instruments that differ in terms of what they are designed to predict (general versus violent recividism) and the inclusion of stable mental health variables.
A large sample of mentally disordered patients were scored on two risk assessment instruments, the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) and the Offender Group Reconviction Scale (OGRS), based on information at the point of discharge. Their criminal histories for at least 2 years following discharge were obtained from official records.
Both instruments were good predictors of both violent and general offending. Over shorter periods (<1 year) the VRAG had very good predictive validities for both types of offences [areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) >0·85], which were significantly better than the OGRS. For longer follow-up periods the instruments had approximately equal prediction accuracy. However, both instruments predicted far more offences than were in fact recorded.
The VRAG is a very good predictor of future violence in the UK sample. The OGRS may also be of value as it can be completed quickly and without the need for mental health variables. Caution is needed, however, as both instruments appeared to over-predict the levels of reconvictions in this sample.
This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.