Bukumiric, Zoran Starcevic, Vladan Stanisavljevic, Dejana Marinkovic, Jelena Milic, Natasa Djukic-Dejanovic, Slavica Janjic, Vladimir Corac, Aleksandar Ilic, Aleksandra Kostic, Mirjana Nikolic, Ivan and Trajkovic, Goran 2016. Meta-analysis of the changes in correlations between depression instruments used in longitudinal studies. Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 190, p. 733.
Fieker, Martina Moritz, Steffen Köther, Ulf and Jelinek, Lena 2016. Emotion recognition in depression: An investigation of performance and response confidence in adult female patients with depression. Psychiatry Research, Vol. 242, p. 226.
Hill, Nikki L. Mogle, Jacqueline Wion, Rachel Munoz, Elizabeth DePasquale, Nicole Yevchak, Andrea M. and Parisi, Jeanine M. 2016. Subjective Cognitive Impairment and Affective Symptoms: A Systematic Review. The Gerontologist, p. gnw091.
Iniesta, Raquel Malki, Karim Maier, Wolfgang Rietschel, Marcella Mors, Ole Hauser, Joanna Henigsberg, Neven Dernovsek, Mojca Zvezdana Souery, Daniel Stahl, Daniel Dobson, Richard Aitchison, Katherine J. Farmer, Anne Lewis, Cathryn M. McGuffin, Peter and Uher, Rudolf 2016. Combining clinical variables to optimize prediction of antidepressant treatment outcomes. Journal of Psychiatric Research, Vol. 78, p. 94.
Knowles, Emma E.M. Kent, Jack W. McKay, D. Reese Sprooten, Emma Mathias, Samuel R. Curran, Joanne E. Carless, Melanie A. de Almeida, Marcio A.A. Harald, H.H. Goring Dyer, Tom D. Olvera, Rene L. Fox, Peter T. Duggirala, Ravi Almasy, Laura Blangero, John and Glahn, David C. 2016. Genome-wide linkage on chromosome 10q26 for a dimensional scale of major depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 191, p. 123.
Rizvi, Sakina J. Pizzagalli, Diego A. Sproule, Beth A. and Kennedy, Sidney H. 2016. Assessing anhedonia in depression: Potentials and pitfalls. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, Vol. 65, p. 21.
Suzuki, Masahiro Dallaspezia, Sara Locatelli, Clara Uchiyama, Makoto Colombo, Cristina and Benedetti, Francesco 2016. Discrepancy between subjective and objective severity as a predictor of response to chronotherapeutics in bipolar depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 204, p. 48.
Akashi, Hiroyuki Tsujii, Noa Mikawa, Wakako Adachi, Toru Kirime, Eiji and Shirakawa, Osamu 2015. Prefrontal cortex activation is associated with a discrepancy between self- and observer-rated depression severities of major depressive disorder: A multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy study. Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 174, p. 165.
Brütt, Anna Levke Schulz, Holger and Andreas, Sylke 2015. Psychometric properties of an instrument to measure activities and participation according to the ICF concept in patients with mental disorders. Disability and Rehabilitation, Vol. 37, Issue. 3, p. 259.
Buttenschøn, Henriette N. Foldager, Leslie Elfving, Betina Poulsen, Pia H.P. Uher, Rudolf and Mors, Ole 2015. Neurotrophic factors in depression in response to treatment. Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 183, p. 287.
Cano, Juan Fernando Gomez Restrepo, Carlos and Rondón, Martín 2015. Validación en Colombia del instrumento para evaluación de la depresión Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría,
Fried, Eiko I and Nesse, Randolph M 2015. Depression sum-scores don’t add up: why analyzing specific depression symptoms is essential. BMC Medicine, Vol. 13, Issue. 1,
Louise, Stephanie Gurvich, Caroline Neill, Erica Tan, Eric J. Van Rheenen, Tamsyn E. and Rossell, Susan 2015. Schizotypal Traits are Associated with Poorer Executive Functioning in Healthy Adults. Frontiers in Psychiatry, Vol. 6,
Möller, Hans-Jürgen Bandelow, Borwin Bauer, Michael Hampel, Harald Herpertz, Sabine C. Soyka, Michael Barnikol, Utako B. Lista, Simone Severus, Emanuel and Maier, Wolfgang 2015. DSM-5 reviewed from different angles: goal attainment, rationality, use of evidence, consequences—part 1: general aspects and paradigmatic discussion of depressive disorders. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, Vol. 265, Issue. 1, p. 5.
Rizvi, Sakina J. Quilty, Lena C. Sproule, Beth A. Cyriac, Anna Michael Bagby, R. and Kennedy, Sidney H. 2015. Development and validation of the Dimensional Anhedonia Rating Scale (DARS) in a community sample and individuals with major depression. Psychiatry Research, Vol. 229, Issue. 1-2, p. 109.
Rizvi, Sakina J. Sproule, Beth A. Gallaugher, Laura McIntyre, Roger S. and Kennedy, Sidney H. 2015. Correlates of benzodiazepine use in major depressive disorder: The effect of anhedonia. Journal of Affective Disorders, Vol. 187, p. 101.
Bech, Per Allerup, Peter Larsen, Erik Roj Csillag, Claudio and Licht, Rasmus W. 2014. The Hamilton Depression Scale (HAM-D) and the Montgomery–Åsberg Depression Scale (MADRS). A psychometric re-analysis of the European Genome-Based Therapeutic Drugs for Depression Study using Rasch analysis. Psychiatry Research, Vol. 217, Issue. 3, p. 226.
Craighead, W. Edward and Dunlop, Boadie W. 2014. Combination Psychotherapy and Antidepressant Medication Treatment for Depression: For Whom, When, and How. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 65, Issue. 1, p. 267.
Deng, Ai-Wen Xiong, Ri-Bo Jiang, Ting-Ting Luo, Ying-Ping and Chen, Wang-Zhong 2014. Prevalence and risk factors of postpartum depression in a population-based sample of women in Tangxia Community, Guangzhou. Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Medicine, Vol. 7, Issue. 3, p. 244.
Heidenblut, Sonja and Zank, Susanne 2014. Screening for Depression with the Depression in Old Age Scale (DIA-S) and the Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS15). GeroPsych, Vol. 27, Issue. 1, p. 41.
A number of scales are used to estimate the severity of depression. However, differences between self-report and clinician rating, multi-dimensionality and different weighting of individual symptoms in summed scores may affect the validity of measurement. In this study we examined and integrated the psychometric properties of three commonly used rating scales.
The 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17), the Montgomery–Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) were administered to 660 adult patients with unipolar depression in a multi-centre pharmacogenetic study. Item response theory (IRT) and factor analysis were used to evaluate their psychometric properties and estimate true depression severity, as well as to group items and derive factor scores.
The MADRS and the BDI provide internally consistent but mutually distinct estimates of depression severity. The HAMD-17 is not internally consistent and contains several items less suitable for out-patients. Factor analyses indicated a dominant depression factor. A model comprising three dimensions, namely ‘observed mood and anxiety’, ‘cognitive’ and ‘neurovegetative’, provided a more detailed description of depression severity.
The MADRS and the BDI can be recommended as complementary measures of depression severity. The three factor scores are proposed for external validation.
This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.