Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Pseudohallucinations: a conceptual history

  • G. E. Berrios (a1) and T. R. Dening (a1)
Abstract
Synopsis

The term ‘pseudohallucination’ is currently used to name imaginal experiences whose relationship to one another and to hallucinations ‘proper’ remains obscure. Clinicians, including specialists in psychopathology, disagree on how pseudohallucination must be defined and on its diagnostic role. Empirical research is unlikely to help as the term does not have a stable referent. Historical and conceptual analyses, on the other hand, are of great use to show how this untidy state of affairs has obtained. This paper includes a full account of the history of pseudohallucination and concludes that: (a) the problem has resulted from the fact that the history of the word, concept (s) and putative behaviour (s) failed to ‘converge’ (i.e. there never has been a time when the three components have formed a stable complex); (b) failure to converge has been caused by the fact that the concept of pseudohallucination is parasitical upon that of hallucination, and that the latter has proved to be far more unstable than what is usually recognized; (c) hence, pseudohallucination is a vicarious construct (i.e. one created by a temporary conceptual need, and which is not associated with a biological invariant); (d) pseudohallucination is used as the ‘joker’ in a poker game (i.e. made to take diagnostic values according to clinical need) – this has led to diagnostic complacency and retarded important decisions as to the nature and definition of hallucinations; and (e) the language of current descriptive psychopathology is not fine-grained enough to generate a stable frame for pseudohallucination. This suggests that its boundaries and usage will remain fuzzy and unbridled.

Copyright
Corresponding author
1Address for correspondence: Dr G. E. Berrios, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital (Box 189), Hills Road, Cambridge CB2 2QQ.
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

A. Aggernæs (1972). The experienced reality of hallucinations and other psychological phenomena. An empirical analysis. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 48, 220238.

A. Aggernæs & O Nyeborg (1972). The reliability of different aspects of the experienced reality of hallucinations in clear states of consciousness. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 48, 239252.

C. E. Bacon (1991). Visual pseudo-hallucinations: psychotherapy case study of a long-standing perceptual disorder. Psychopathology 24, 361364.

T. Dening & G. E. Berrios (1996). The enigma of pseudohallucinations: current meaning and usage. Psychopathology (in the press).

A. A. Grünbaum (1917). Pseudovorstellung und Pseudohalluzination. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie 37, 100109.

K. Jaspers (1911). Zur Analyse der Trugwahrnehmungen (Leibhaftigkeit und Realitätsurteil). Zeitschrift für die gesamte Neurologie und Psychiatrie 6, 460535.

V. Kandinsky (1881). Zur Lehre von den Hallucinationen. Archiv für Psychiatrie und Nervenkrankheiten 11, 453464.

F. Schiller (1985). The inveterate paradox of dreaming. Archives of Neurology 42, 903906.

G. Sedman (1966 b). ‘Inner voices’: phenomenological and clinical aspects. British Journal of Psychiatry 112, 485490.

G. Sedman (1966 c). A phenomenological study of pseudohallucinations and related experiences. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 42, 3570.

M. Spitzer (1987). Pseudohalluzinationen. Forschritte Neurologie und Psychiatrie 55, 9197.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Psychological Medicine
  • ISSN: 0033-2917
  • EISSN: 1469-8978
  • URL: /core/journals/psychological-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Metrics

Altmetric attention score