Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-p566r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-18T05:17:41.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

How does cognitive behaviour therapy reduce fatigue in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome? The role of physical activity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 January 2010

J. F. Wiborg*
Affiliation:
Expert Centre Chronic Fatigue and Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands
H. Knoop
Affiliation:
Expert Centre Chronic Fatigue and Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands
M. Stulemeijer
Affiliation:
Expert Centre Chronic Fatigue and Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands
J. B. Prins
Affiliation:
Expert Centre Chronic Fatigue and Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands
G. Bleijenberg
Affiliation:
Expert Centre Chronic Fatigue and Department of Medical Psychology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, The Netherlands
*
*Address for correspondence: J. F. Wiborg, Expert Centre Chronic Fatigue, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, The Netherlands. (Email: j.wiborg@nkcv.umcn.nl)

Abstract

Background

Cognitive behaviour therapy (CBT) is known to reduce fatigue severity in chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS). How this change in symptomatology is accomplished is not yet understood. The purpose of the present study was to determine whether the effect of CBT on fatigue is mediated by an increase in physical activity.

Method

Three randomized controlled trials were reanalysed, previously conducted to evaluate the efficacy of CBT for CFS. In all samples, actigraphy was used to assess the level of physical activity prior and subsequent to treatment or a control group period. The mediation hypothesis was analysed according to guidelines of Baron & Kenny [Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (1986)51, 1173–1182]. A non-parametric bootstrap approach was used to test statistical significance of the mediation effect.

Results

Although CBT effectively reduced fatigue, it did not change the level of physical activity. Furthermore, changes in physical activity were not related to changes in fatigue. Across the samples, the mean mediation effect of physical activity averaged about 1% of the total treatment effect. This effect did not yield significance in any of the samples.

Conclusions

The effect of CBT on fatigue in CFS is not mediated by a persistent increase in physical activity.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baron, RM, Kenny, DA (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 11731182.Google Scholar
Black, CD, O'Connor, PJ, McCully, KK (2005). Increased daily physical activity and fatigue symptoms in chronic fatigue syndrome. Dynamic Medicine 4. Published online: 3 March 2005. doi:10.1186/1476-5918-4-3.Google Scholar
Bleijenberg, G, Prins, JB, Bazelmans, E (2003). Cognitive-behavioral therapies. In Handbook of Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ed. Jason, L. A., Fennell, P. A. and Taylor, R. R.), pp. 493526. Wiley: New York.Google Scholar
Chambers, D, Bagnall, AM, Hempel, S, Forbes, C (2006). Interventions for the treatment, management and rehabilitation of patients with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis: an updated systematic review. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 99, 506520.Google Scholar
Deale, A, Chalder, T, Marks, I, Wessely, S (1997). Cognitive behavior therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Psychiatry 154, 408414.Google Scholar
Deale, A, Chalder, T, Wessely, S (1998). Illness beliefs and treatment outcome in chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 45, 7783.Google Scholar
Dittner, AJ, Wessely, S, Brown, RG (2004). The assessment of fatigue: a practical guide for clinicians and researchers. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 56, 157170.Google Scholar
Frazier, PA, Tix, AP, Barron, KE (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology 51, 115134.Google Scholar
Fukuda, K, Straus, SE, Hickie, I, Sharpe, MC, Dobbins, JG, Komaroff, A (1994). The chronic fatigue syndrome: a comprehensive approach to its definition and study. International Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Study Group. Annals of Internal Medicine 121, 953959.Google Scholar
Fulcher, KY, White, PD (1997). Randomised controlled trial of graded exercise in patients with the chronic fatigue syndrome. British Medical Journal 314, 16471652.Google Scholar
Knoop, H, van der Meer, JW, Bleijenberg, G (2008). Guided self-instructions for people with chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial. British Journal of Psychiatry 193, 340341.Google Scholar
Larun, L, McGuire, H, Edmonds, M, Odgaard-Jensen, J, Price, JR (2004). Exercise therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD003200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003200.pub2.Google Scholar
Malouff, JM, Thorsteinsson, EB, Rooke, SE, Bhullar, N, Schutte, NS (2008). Efficacy of cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review 28, 736745.Google Scholar
Moss-Morris, R, Sharon, C, Tobin, R, Baldi, JC (2005). A randomized controlled graded exercise trial for chronic fatigue syndrome: outcomes and mechanisms of change. Journal of Health Psychology 10, 245259.Google Scholar
Preacher, KJ, Hayes, AF (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 36, 717731.Google Scholar
Price, JR, Mitchell, E, Tidy, E, Hunot, V (2008). Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 3. Art. No.: CD001027. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001027.pub2.Google Scholar
Prins, JB, Bleijenberg, G, Bazelmans, E, Elving, LD, de Boo, TM, Severens, JL, van der Wilt, GJ, Spinhoven, P, van der Meer, JW (2001). Cognitive behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 357, 841847.Google Scholar
Quarmby, L, Rimes, KA, Deale, A, Wessely, S, Chalder, T (2007). Cognitive-behaviour therapy for chronic fatigue syndrome: comparison of outcomes within and outside the confines of a randomised controlled trial. Behaviour Research and Therapy 45, 10851094.Google Scholar
Sharpe, M, Hawton, K, Simkin, S, Surawy, C, Hackmann, A, Klimes, I, Peto, T, Warrell, D, Seagroatt, V (1996). Cognitive behaviour therapy for the chronic fatigue syndrome: a randomized controlled trial. British Medical Journal 312, 2226.Google Scholar
Stulemeijer, M, de Jong, LW, Fiselier, TJ, Hoogveld, SW, Bleijenberg, G (2005). Cognitive behaviour therapy for adolescents with chronic fatigue syndrome: randomised controlled trial. British Medical Journal 330. Published online: 7 December 2004. doi:10.1136/bmj.38301.587106.63.Google Scholar
Vercoulen, JH, Swanink, CM, Fennis, JF, Galama, JM, van der Meer, JW, Bleijenberg, G (1994). Dimensional assessment of chronic fatigue syndrome. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 38, 383392.Google Scholar
Vercoulen, JH, Swanink, CM, Galama, JM, Fennis, JF, Jongen, PJ, Hommes, OR, van der Meer, JW, Bleijenberg, G (1998). The persistence of fatigue in chronic fatigue syndrome and multiple sclerosis: development of a model. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 45, 507517.Google Scholar
van der Werf, SP, Prins, JB, Vercoulen, JH, van der Meer, JW, Bleijenberg, G (2000). Identifying physical activity patterns in chronic fatigue syndrome using actigraphic assessment. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 49, 373379.Google Scholar
Wearden, AJ, Morriss, RK, Mullis, R, Strickland, PL, Pearson, DJ, Appleby, L, Campbell, IT, Morris, JA (1998). Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment trial of fluoxetine and graded exercise for chronic fatigue syndrome. British Journal of Psychiatry 172, 485490.Google Scholar