Skip to main content
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 20
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Craig, Shelley Frankford, Rachel Allan, Kate Williams, Charmaine Schwartz, Celia Yaworski, Andrea Janz, Gwen and Malek-Saniee, Sara 2016. Self-reported patient psychosocial needs in integrated primary health care: A role for social work in interdisciplinary teams. Social Work in Health Care, Vol. 55, Issue. 1, p. 41.

    Turcotte, Stéphane Guerrier, Mireille Labrecque, Michel Robitaille, Hubert Rivest, Louis-Paul Hess, Brian and Légaré, France 2015. Dyadic validity of the Decisional Conflict Scale: common patient/physician measures of patient uncertainty were identified. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 68, Issue. 8, p. 920.

    von Arx, Lill-Brith and Kjær, Trine 2014. The Patient Perspective of Diabetes Care: A Systematic Review of Stated Preference Research. The Patient - Patient-Centered Outcomes Research, Vol. 7, Issue. 3, p. 283.

    Cheraghi-Sohi, Sudeh Bower, Peter Kennedy, Anne Morden, Andrew Rogers, Anne Richardson, Jane Sanders, Tom Stevenson, Fiona and Ong, Bie Nio 2013. Patient Priorities in Osteoarthritis and Comorbid Conditions: A Secondary Analysis of Qualitative Data. Arthritis Care & Research, Vol. 65, Issue. 6, p. 920.

    Dowrick, C Chew-Graham, C Lovell, K Lamb, J Aseem, S Beatty, S Bower, P Burroughs, H Clarke, P Edwards, S Gabbay, M Gravenhorst, K Hammond, J Hibbert, D Kovandžić , M Lloyd-Williams, M Waheed, W and Gask, L 2013. Increasing equity of access to high-quality mental health services in primary care: a mixed-methods study. Programme Grants for Applied Research, Vol. 1, Issue. 2, p. XXXX.

    Roos, Johanna and Werbart, Andrzej 2013. Therapist and relationship factors influencing dropout from individual psychotherapy: A literature review. Psychotherapy Research, Vol. 23, Issue. 4, p. 394.

    Sultan, Serge Attali, Claude Gilberg, Serge Zenasni, Franck and Hartemann, Agnès 2011. Physicians’ understanding of patients’ personal representations of their diabetes: Accuracy and association with self-care. Psychology & Health, Vol. 26, Issue. sup1, p. 101.

    Zastrow, Arne Seyboth, Franziska Faude, Verena Niehoff, Dorothea Herzog, Wolfgang and Löwe, Bernd 2011. Verhaltens- und Einstellungsänderungen nach Behandlung auf einer internistischen beziehungsweise internistisch-psychosomatischen Akutstation - eine qualitative und quantitative naturalistische Katamne. Zeitschrift für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie, Vol. 57, Issue. 2, p. 157.

    Andén, A. André, M. and Rudebeck, C. E. 2010. What happened? GPs’ perceptions of consultation outcomes and a comparison with the experiences of their patients. European Journal of General Practice, Vol. 16, Issue. 2, p. 80.

    Kenny, David A. Veldhuijzen, Wemke Weijden, Trudy van der LeBlanc, Annie Lockyer, Jocelyn Légaré, France and Campbell, Craig 2010. Interpersonal perception in the context of doctor–patient relationships: A dyadic analysis of doctor–patient communication. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 70, Issue. 5, p. 763.

    Smithline, Howard A. Caglar, Selin and Blank, Fidela S. J. 2010. Physician vs Patient Assessment of Dyspnea During Acute Decompensated Heart Failure. Congestive Heart Failure, Vol. 16, Issue. 2, p. 60.

    Thomson, Samuel and Doody, Gillian 2010. Parallel paths? Patient and doctor priorities in psychiatric outpatient consultations. Journal of Mental Health, Vol. 19, Issue. 5, p. 461.

    Street, Richard L. Makoul, Gregory Arora, Neeraj K. and Epstein, Ronald M. 2009. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician–patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 74, Issue. 3, p. 295.

    Lasalvia, A. Bonetto, C. Tansella, M. Stefani, B. and Ruggeri, M. 2008. Does staff–patient agreement on needs for care predict a better mental health outcome? A 4-year follow-up in a community service. Psychological Medicine, Vol. 38, Issue. 01,

    Légaré, France Elwyn, Glyn Fishbein, Martin Frémont, Pierre Frosch, Dominick Gagnon, Marie-Pierre Kenny, David A Labrecque, Michel Stacey, Dawn St-Jacques, Sylvie and van der Weijden, Trudy 2008. Translating shared decision-making into health care clinical practices: Proof of concepts. Implementation Science, Vol. 3, Issue. 1,

    ROSE, DIANA WYKES, TIL FARRIER, DESMOND DORAN, ANN-MARIE SPORLE, TIM and BOGNER, DIANA 2008. What Do Clients Think of Cognitive Remediation Therapy?: A Consumer-Led Investigation of Satisfaction and Side Effects. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, Vol. 11, Issue. 2, p. 181.

    Zastrow, Arne Faude, Verena Seyboth, Franziska Niehoff, Dorothea Herzog, Wolfgang and Löwe, Bernd 2008. Risk factors of symptom underestimation by physicians. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, Vol. 64, Issue. 5, p. 543.

    Wetzels, Raymond Harmsen, Mirjam Van Weel, Chris Grol, Richard Wensing, Michel and Wetzels, Raymond 2007. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.

    Grant, Stewart 2006. Making sense of CORE System data: Attrition, effectiveness, concordance and information capture. European Journal of Psychotherapy & Counselling, Vol. 8, Issue. 2, p. 193.

    Greer, Joseph and Halgin, Richard 2006. Predictors of Physician-Patient Agreement on Symptom Etiology in Primary Care. Psychosomatic Medicine, Vol. 68, Issue. 2, p. 277.


Patient–practitioner agreement: does it matter?

  • M. GABBAY (a1), C. SHIELS (a1), P. BOWER (a1), B. SIBBALD (a1), M. KING (a1) and E. WARD (a1)
  • DOI:
  • Published online: 01 February 2003

Background. Good communication is a crucial clinical skill. Previous research demonstrated better clinical outcomes when practitioners and patients agree about the nature of patients' core presenting complaints. We investigated the nature of this agreement and its impact on outcome among depressed primary care patients.

Method. We compared presenting problem formulations completed by patients, GPs and therapists in a primary care randomized controlled trial of cognitive-behavioural therapy and non-directive counselling for depression. Participants compiled formulations from a list of 13 potential problems of self-completed questionnaires. Subjects scored at least 14 on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) at baseline. Outcome measure for this study included BDI at 4 and 12 months, failure to attend for therapy when referred, dropout from therapy and patient satisfaction.

Results. Among 464 trial patients, 395 received therapy. Patient baseline problem formulations included significantly more items than GPs, who identified significantly more items than therapists. Agreement levels varied according to a range of patient and professional variables. While patients in complete agreement with their therapists about their main problem after assessment had lower average BDI scores at 12 months (9·7 v. 12·8, P=0·03); we found no other significant associations between the extent of agreement and clinical outcome. There were significant (but relatively weak) associations between agreement and aspects of patient satisfaction.

Conclusion. Our results suggest that detailed mutual understanding of the presenting complaints may be less important than agreement that the core problem is psychological, and that referral for psychological therapy is appropriate.

Corresponding author
Address for correspondence to: Dr M. Gabbay, Department of Primary Care, University of Liverpool, Whelan Building, Quadrangle, Brownlow Hill, Liverpool L69 3GB.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Psychological Medicine
  • ISSN: 0033-2917
  • EISSN: 1469-8978
  • URL: /core/journals/psychological-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *