Hostname: page-component-54dcc4c588-scsgl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-10-01T17:24:48.383Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Problems in evaluating the consequences of disabling illness: the case of multiple sclerosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 July 2009

Annette Lawson ,
Ian Robinson  and
Claire Bakes
Annette Lawson*
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and the Brunel–ARMS Research Unit, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex
Ian Robinson
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and the Brunel–ARMS Research Unit, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex
Claire Bakes
Affiliation:
Department of Sociology and the Brunel–ARMS Research Unit, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex
*
1Address for correspondence: Dr Annette Lawson, Department of Sociology, Brunel University., Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Synopsis

There is a need for a method, useful both to the clinician and to the research worker which can assess both the ‘quantity’ and the ‘quality’ of daily life. In this paper two ‘diary’ methods are described for obtaining accounts of daily activities, social contacts and patterns of interaction from people diagnosed as having multiple sclerosis. The information obtained is compared with that derived from a major decennial national survey of the population aged over 4 years and from a selected group of matched non-patient controls. The paper is divided into two parts, each concentrating on one of the techniques. The first is a postal 24-hour written account; the second a detailed tape-recorded interview known as the ‘Standard Day Interview’. Difficulties and advantages in using these approaches to assess both the quantitative and the qualitative changes during disabling illness are discussed and proposals for developing the methods are presented. Indications of substantive variation in the use of time by samples drawn from the ‘healthy’ and from populations with multiple sclerosis are reported.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Psychological Medicine , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , August 1985 , pp. 555 - 579
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

BBC Audience Research Department (1976). The People's Activities and the Use of Time. BBC: London.Google Scholar
Benjamin, J. (1976). The Northwick Park ADL Index. Occupational Therapy 39, 301–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berk, R. A. & Berk, S. F. (1979). Labor and Leisure at Home. Sage Library of Social Research No. 87. Sage: London.Google Scholar
Bernstein, B. (1971). Class Codes and Control. Routledge & Kegan Paul: London.Google Scholar
Blaxter, M. (1976). The Meaning of Disability. Heinemann: London.Google Scholar
Brain, W. R. (1977). Diseases of the Nervous System. Oxford University Press: London.Google Scholar
Brunel–ARMS Research Unit (1983). MS people – a demographic profile. General Report No. 2.Google Scholar
Burnett, J. (ed.) (1974). Useful Toil. Allen Lane: London.Google Scholar
Buxton, J. (1983). The economics of heart transplant programmes: measuring the benefits. In Measuring the Social Benefits of Medicine (ed. Smith, G. Teeling), p. 48. OHE: London.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. & McNeil, J. (1970). The Leyton Obsessional Inventory. Psychological Medicine 1, 48–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglas, J. W. B., Lawson, A., Cooper, J. E. & Cooper, E. (1968). Family interaction and the activities of young children. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 9, 157–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglas, J. W. B., Cooper, J. E., Lawson, A., Cooper, E., McNeil, J., Alderman, B. & Ingleby, J. E. (1971). Family interaction and the activities of children. MRC Internal Report.Google Scholar
Geddes, D. (1983). Measurement of the benefits in respiratory disease. In Measuring the Social Benefits of Medicine (ed. Teeling Smith, G.), pp. 116–120. OHE: London.Google Scholar
Goble, R. (1976). Report of the group discussing the relevance of an ADL Index in normal environmental conditions. Occupational Therapy 39, 300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gough, R. (1981). The History of Myddle (ed. Hey, D.). Penguin: Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Harris, A. I. (1971). Handicapped and Impaired in Great Britain. HMSO: London.Google Scholar
Harrison, T. (1939). Britain by Mass Observation. Penguin: Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Hunt, S. M., McEwen, J., McKenna, S. P. & Backett, E. M. (1982). The Nottingham Health Profile. Medical School: University of Nottingham (mimeo).Google Scholar
Hyman, H., Cobb, W. J., Feldman, J., Hart, C. & Stember, C. (1978). The technique of interviewing. In Modern Sociology (2nd edn) (ed. Worsley, P.), pp. 103–113. Penguin: Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
IBA Audience Research Department (1978). Lonely People and the Media: Report on a Study. IBA: London.Google Scholar
Jencks, C. (1973). Inequality: A Re-assessment of the Effect of Family and Schooling in America. Allen Lane: London.Google Scholar
Kirp, D. (1982). Just Schools: The Idea of Racial Equality in American Education. University of California Press: Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurland, L. T. & Stazio, A. (1965). An appraisal of population studies of multiple sclerosis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 122, 520–554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurtzke, J. F. (1980 a). Multiple sclerosis: an overview. In Clinical Neuroepidemiology (ed. Rose, F. C.), pp. 170–195. Pitman Medical: London.Google Scholar
Kurtzke, J. F. (1980 b). Epidemiological contributions to multiple sclerosis: an overview. Neurology 30, 61–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kurtzke, J. F. (1981). Initial proposal for a uniform minimal record of disability. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica 65, Suppl. 87, 48–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laslett, P. (1965). The World We Have Lost. Methuen: London (second edn 1977).Google Scholar
Lawson, A. & Ingleby, J. D. (1974). Daily routines of pre-school children: effects of age, birth order, sex and social class, and developmental correlates. Psychological Medicine 4, 399–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
LeRoy Ladurie, E. (1978). Montaillou. Cathars and Catholics in a French Village. Scolar.Google Scholar
Levine, S. (1956). A further study of infantile handling and adult avoidance learning. Journal of Personality 25, 70–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lincoln, N. (1981). Discrepancies between capabilities and performance of activities of daily living in multiple sclerosis patients. Institute of Rehabilitative Medicine 3, 84–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mass Observation (1951). The Housewife's Day. Mass Observation Bulletin No. 42, esp. p. 2.Google Scholar
McAlpine, D., Lumsden, C. E. & Acheson, E. D. (1972). Multiple Sclerosis: A Reappraisal. Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh.Google Scholar
McLaine, I. (1979). Ministry of Morale: Home Front Morale and Ministry of Information in World War II, p. 7. Allen & Unwin: London.Google Scholar
Moss, L. & Goldstein, H. (eds.) (1979). The Recall Method in Social Surveys. Studies in Education No. 9. Inst. of Education: London/NFER Publishing Company: Windsor.Google Scholar
New Statesman (1982). An appeal for diarists of the Falklands war. Classified advertisement columns, May.Google Scholar
Oakley, A. (1974). Housewife. Robertson: London.Google Scholar
Patrick, D. L., Darby, S. C., Green, S., Horton, G., Locker, D. & Wiggins, R. D. (1981). Screening and disability in the inner city. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 35, 65–70.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pocock, D. (1984). Mass observation returns to look at everyday lives. Guardian 7 May.Google Scholar
Robinson, I., Bakes, C. & Lawson, A. (1983). Questioning the facts: more women than men?Paper delivered to BSA Medical Sociology Conference,York.Google Scholar
Sainsbury, S. (1973). Measuring Disability, p. 10. Occasional Papers on Social Administration No. 54. The Social Administration Research Trust/Bell: London.Google Scholar
Staples, D. & Lincoln, N. (1979). Intellectual impairment in multiple sclerosis and its relation to functional abilities. Rheumatology and Rehabilitation 18, 153–160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stone, L. (1977). The Family, Sex and Marriage in England 1500–1800. Weidenfeld & Nicholson: London.Google Scholar
Szalai, A. (ed.) (1972). The Use of Time: Daily Activities of Urban and Suburban Populations in Twelve Countries. Mouton: The Hague.Google Scholar
Whiting, S. & Lincoln, N. (1980). An ADL assessment for stroke patients. Occupational Therapy 43, 44–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, P. H. N. (1975). Classification of Impairments and Handicaps. WHO: Geneva.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (1980). International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps. WHO: Geneva.Google Scholar
Zubek, J. (ed.) (1969). Sensory Deprivation: Fifteen Years of Research. Appleton Century Crofts: New York.Google Scholar