Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa
  • Get access
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
  • Cited by 17
  • Cited by
    This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by CrossRef.

    Patterson, Sue Waller, Diane Killaspy, Helen and Crawford, Mike J. 2015. Riding the wake: Detailing the art therapy delivered in the MATISSE study. International Journal of Art Therapy, Vol. 20, Issue. 1, p. 28.


    Purgato, M. Barbui, C. Stroup, S. and Adams, C. 2015. Pragmatic design in randomized controlled trials. Psychological Medicine, Vol. 45, Issue. 02, p. 225.


    Alzayyat, Abdulkarim Subhi 2014. Barriers to Evidence-Based Practice Utilization in Psychiatric/Mental Health Nursing. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, Vol. 35, Issue. 2, p. 134.


    Feigenbaum, Janet D. Fonagy, Peter Pilling, Stephen Jones, Alan Wildgoose, Amanda and Bebbington, Paul E. 2012. A real-world study of the effectiveness of DBT in the UK National Health Service. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, Vol. 51, Issue. 2, p. 121.


    Guastella, Adam J. and Alvares, Gail A. 2012. Psychobiological Approaches for Anxiety Disorders.


    Stamenkovic, Sophie Solesse, Anne Zanetti, Laura Zagury, Pascale and Vray, Muriel 2012. Guide de la Haute autorité de santé (HAS) : les études post-inscription sur les technologies de santé (médicaments, dispositifs médicaux et actes) : principes et méthodes. Thérapie, Vol. 67, Issue. 5, p. 409.


    Boutron, Isabelle and Ravaud, Philippe 2011. Randomized Clinical Trials of Nonpharmacological Treatments.


    Horsfall, Jan Cleary, Michelle and Hunt, Glenn E. 2011. Developing Partnerships in Mental Health to Bridge the Research-Practitioner Gap. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, Vol. 47, Issue. 1, p. 6.


    Morriss, Richard K Lobban, Fiona Jones, Steven Riste, Lisa Peters, Sarah Roberts, Christopher Davies, Linda and Mayes, Debbie 2011. Pragmatic randomised controlled trial of group psychoeducation versus group support in the maintenance of bipolar disorder. BMC Psychiatry, Vol. 11, Issue. 1,


    Cleary, Michelle Hunt, Glenn E Walter, Garry and Jackson, Debra 2010. Fostering real-world clinical mental health research. Journal of Clinical Nursing, Vol. 19, Issue. 23-24, p. 3453.


    Friedberg, Jennifer P. Lipsitz, Stuart R. and Natarajan, Sundar 2010. Challenges and recommendations for blinding in behavioral interventions illustrated using a case study of a behavioral intervention to lower blood pressure. Patient Education and Counseling, Vol. 78, Issue. 1, p. 5.


    Morriss, Richard Marttunnen, Sarah Garland, Anne Nixon, Neil McDonald, Ruth Sweeney, Tim Flambert, Heather Fox, Richard Kaylor-Hughes, Catherine James, Marilyn and Yang, Min 2010. Randomised controlled trial of the clinical and cost effectiveness of a specialist team for managing refractory unipolar depressive disorder. BMC Psychiatry, Vol. 10, Issue. 1,


    Zettler, Laura L. Speechley, Mark R. Foley, Norine C. Salter, Katherine L. and Teasell, Robert W. 2010. A scale for distinguishing efficacy from effectiveness was adapted and applied to stroke rehabilitation studies. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, Vol. 63, Issue. 1, p. 11.


    Vanheule, Stijn 2009. PSYCHOTHERAPY AND RESEARCH: A RELATION THAT NEEDS TO BE REINVENTED. British Journal of Psychotherapy, Vol. 25, Issue. 1, p. 91.


    Bortolotti, Biancamaria Menchetti, Marco Bellini, Francesca Montaguti, Milena Barbara and Berardi, Domenico 2008. Psychological interventions for major depression in primary care: a meta-analytic review of randomized controlled trials. General Hospital Psychiatry, Vol. 30, Issue. 4, p. 293.


    Evers, Silvia Salvador–Carulla, Luis Halsteinli, Vidar and McDaid, David 2007. Implementing mental health economic evaluation evidence: Building a bridge between theory and practice. Journal of Mental Health, Vol. 16, Issue. 2, p. 223.


    Lasalvia, A. and Ruggeri, M. 2007. Assessing the outcome of community-based psychiatric care: building a feedback loop from ‘real world’ health services research into clinical practice. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, Vol. 116, Issue. s437, p. 6.


    ×

Seven criteria for improving effectiveness trials in psychiatry

  • MICHELE TANSELLA (a1), GRAHAM THORNICROFT (a2), CORRADO BARBUI (a1), ANDREA CIPRIANI (a1) and BENEDETTO SARACENO (a3)
  • DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S003329170600715X
  • Published online: 02 March 2006
Abstract

Background. There are no published criteria for improving the quality of effectiveness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in psychiatry.

Method. The authors review and systematize the relevant literature on effectiveness trials, with particular reference to psychiatry.

Results. In planning effectiveness RCTs in psychiatry, seven sets of issues need to be carefully considered: (i) study question (i.e. is the study question expressed in an answerable way?); (ii) reference population (i.e. what is the reference group or subgroup to which the trial results should be generalized?); (iii) patient sample (i.e. how far does the sample reflect the target population?); (iv) study settings (i.e. how representative are the study settings of routine clinical sites?); (v) study interventions (i.e. is the study intervention manualized, acceptable to patients and suitable for widespread use?); (vi) control condition (i.e. are the key characteristics of the control condition well described, and do they vary within and between sites?); and (vii) bias (e.g. attrition, blinding, concealment, consent and contamination).

Conclusions. More effectiveness trials are needed which have sufficient statistical power to provide precise answers to assist clinicians in making treatment decisions. The development of effectiveness trials in psychiatry, both for studies of individual treatments and for service evaluations, may be enhanced by carefully considering and justifying decisions in relation to each of the seven key headings proposed here.

Copyright
Corresponding author
Department of Medicine and Public Health, Section of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy. (Email: michele.tansella@univr.it)
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Psychological Medicine
  • ISSN: 0033-2917
  • EISSN: 1469-8978
  • URL: /core/journals/psychological-medicine
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×