Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-19T14:03:53.665Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Seven criteria for improving effectiveness trials in psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 March 2006

MICHELE TANSELLA
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine and Public Health, Section of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, University of Verona
GRAHAM THORNICROFT
Affiliation:
Health Service Research Department, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London
CORRADO BARBUI
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine and Public Health, Section of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, University of Verona
ANDREA CIPRIANI
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine and Public Health, Section of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychology, University of Verona
BENEDETTO SARACENO
Affiliation:
Department of Mental Health and Substance Dependence, World Health Organisation, Geneva

Abstract

Background. There are no published criteria for improving the quality of effectiveness of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in psychiatry.

Method. The authors review and systematize the relevant literature on effectiveness trials, with particular reference to psychiatry.

Results. In planning effectiveness RCTs in psychiatry, seven sets of issues need to be carefully considered: (i) study question (i.e. is the study question expressed in an answerable way?); (ii) reference population (i.e. what is the reference group or subgroup to which the trial results should be generalized?); (iii) patient sample (i.e. how far does the sample reflect the target population?); (iv) study settings (i.e. how representative are the study settings of routine clinical sites?); (v) study interventions (i.e. is the study intervention manualized, acceptable to patients and suitable for widespread use?); (vi) control condition (i.e. are the key characteristics of the control condition well described, and do they vary within and between sites?); and (vii) bias (e.g. attrition, blinding, concealment, consent and contamination).

Conclusions. More effectiveness trials are needed which have sufficient statistical power to provide precise answers to assist clinicians in making treatment decisions. The development of effectiveness trials in psychiatry, both for studies of individual treatments and for service evaluations, may be enhanced by carefully considering and justifying decisions in relation to each of the seven key headings proposed here.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)