Volunteers’ experiences of providing telephone-based breast-feeding peer support in the RUBY randomised controlled trial

Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia School of Nursing & Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia La Trobe Rural Health School, Bendigo, Victoria 3552, Australia

T Shafiei

Affiliation:

Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia

HL McLachlan

Affiliation:

Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia School of Nursing & Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria 3086, Australia

DA Forster

Affiliation:

Judith Lumley Centre, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria 3000, Australia The Royal Women’s Hospital, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia

Corresponding

E-mail address:

h.grimes@latrobe.edu.au

Article
Metrics

Article contents

Abstract
References

Get access Rights & Permissions

Abstract

Objective:

The Ringing Up About Breastfeeding earlY (RUBY) randomised controlled trial (RCT) found that a telephone-based peer volunteer support intervention increased breast-feeding duration in a setting with high breast-feeding initiation. This sub-study of the RUBY RCT describes the motivation, preparation and experiences of volunteers who provided the peer support intervention.

Design:

An online survey was completed by 154 (67 %) volunteers after ceasing volunteering.

Setting:

Volunteers provided peer support to primiparous women (n 574) who birthed at one of three public hospitals in Melbourne, Australia, between February 2013 and December 2015.

Participants:

Volunteers (n 230) had themselves breastfed for at least 6 months and received 4 h of training for the role.

Results:

The median number of mothers supported was two (range 1–11), and two-thirds of respondents supported at least one mother for 6 months. Volunteers were motivated by a strong desire to support new mothers to establish and continue breast-feeding. Most (93 %) considered the training session adequate. The majority (60 %) reported following the call schedule ‘most of the time’, but many commented that ‘it depends on the mother’. Overall, 84 % of volunteers were satisfied with the role and reported that the experience was enjoyable (85 %) and worthwhile (90 %). Volunteers agreed that telephone support for breast-feeding was valued by women (88 %) and that the programme would be effective in helping women to breastfeed (93 %).

Conclusions:

These findings are important for those developing similar peer support programmes in which recruiting volunteers and developing training requirements are an integral and recurrent part of volunteer management.

Keywords

Peer support Breast-feeding Breast-feeding support Volunteer

Type

Research paper

Information

Public Health Nutrition , Volume 23 , Issue 16 , November 2020 , pp. 3005 - 3015

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S136898002000124X

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Victora, CG, Bahl, R, Barros, AJD et al. (2016) Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet 387, 475–490.10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01024-7CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2011) 2010 Australian National Infant Feeding Survey: Indicator Results. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2001) The Optimal Duration of Exclusive Breastfeeding: Report of an Expert Consultation. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

National Health and Medical Research Council (2012) Infant Feeding Guidelines. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council.Google Scholar

COAG Health Council (2019) Australian National Breastfeeding Strategy: 2019 and Beyond. Canberra: COAG Health Council.Google Scholar

Renfrew, M, McCormick, F, Wade, A et al. (2012) Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 5, CD001141.Google Scholar

McFadden, A, Gavine, A, Renfrew, MJ et al. (2017) Support for healthy breastfeeding mothers with healthy term babies. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2 (2), CD001141. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001141.pub5.CrossRef Google Scholar

Brown, CRL, Dodds, L, Legge, A et al. (2014) Factors influencing the reasons why mothers stop breastfeeding. Can J Public Health 105, e179–e185.10.17269/cjph.105.4244CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Forster, DA, McLachlan, HL, Davey, M-A et al. (2014) Ringing Up about Breastfeeding: a randomised controlled trial exploring early telephone peer support for breastfeeding (RUBY) – trial protocol. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 14, 177.10.1186/1471-2393-14-177CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Forster, DA, McLardie-Hore, FE, McLachlan, HL et al. (2019) Proactive peer (mother-to-mother) breastfeeding support by telephone (ringing up about breastfeeding early [RUBY]): a multicentre, unblinded, randomised controlled trial. EClinicalMedicine 8, 20–28.10.1016/j.eclinm.2019.02.003CrossRef Google Scholar

Hoffmann, TC, Glasziou, PP, Boutron, I et al. (2014) Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ 348, g1687.10.1136/bmj.g1687CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dennis, CL (2003) Peer support within a health care context: a concept analysis. Int J of Nurs Stud 40, 321–332.10.1016/S0020-7489(02)00092-5CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Trickey, H, Thomson, G, Grant, A et al. (2018) A realist review of one-to-one breastfeeding peer support experiments conducted in developed country settings. Mat Child Nutr 14, E12559.10.1111/mcn.12559CrossRef Google Scholar

Luke, DA, Calhoun, A, Robichaux, CB et al. (2014) The program sustainability assessment tool: a new instrument for public health programs. Prev Chron Dis 11, E12.Google Scholar PubMed

Milat, AJ, Bauman, A & Redman, S (2015) Narrative review of models and success factors for scaling up public health interventions. Implement Sci 10, 113.10.1186/s13012-015-0301-6CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pérez-Escamilla, R, Curry, L, Minhas, D et al. (2012) Scaling up of breastfeeding promotion programs in low- and middle-income countries: the “breastfeeding gear” model. Adv Nutr 3, 790–800.10.3945/an.112.002873CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Pistrang, N, Jay, Z, Gessler, S et al. (2013) Telephone peer support for women with gynaecological cancer: benefits and challenges for supporters. Psychooncology 22, 886–894.10.1002/pon.3080CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dennis, CL (2002) Breastfeeding peer support: maternal and volunteer perceptions from a randomized controlled trial. Birth 29, 169–176.10.1046/j.1523-536X.2002.00184.xCrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

MacLellan, J, Surey, J, Abubakar, I et al. (2015) Peer support workers in health: a qualitative metasynthesis of their experiences. PLoS One 10, e0141122.10.1371/journal.pone.0141122CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dale, J, Caramlau, IO, Lindenmeyer, A et al. (2008) Peer support telephone calls for improving health. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 4, CD006903.10.1002/14651858.CD006903.pub2CrossRef Google Scholar

Murphy, CA, Cupples, ME, Percy, A et al. (2008) Peer-mentoring for first-time mothers from areas of socio-economic disadvantage: a qualitative study within a randomised controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 8, 46.10.1186/1472-6963-8-46CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Barg, FK, Weiner, MG, Joseph, S et al. (2012) Qualitative analysis of peer coaches’ experiences with counseling African Americans about reducing heart disease risk. J Gen Intern Med 27, 167–172.10.1007/s11606-011-1883-6CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Curtis, P, Woodhill, R & Stapleton, H (2007) The peer-professional interface in a community-based, breast feeding peer-support project. Midwifery 23, 146–156.10.1016/j.midw.2006.04.003CrossRef Google Scholar

Aiken, A & Thomson, G (2013) Professionalisation of a breast-feeding peer support service: issues and experiences of peer supporters. Midwifery 29, e145–e151.10.1016/j.midw.2012.12.014CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Dennis, CL (2013) Peer support for postpartum depression: volunteers’ perceptions, recruitment strategies and training from a randomized controlled trial. Health Prom Int 28, 187–196.10.1093/heapro/das003CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Qualtrics (2013) Qualtrics Research Core 2013–2015 ed. Provo, UT: Qualtrics.Google Scholar

Clary, EG, Snyder, M, Ridge, RD et al. (1998) Understanding and assessing the motivations of volunteers: a functional approach. J Pers Soc Psychol 74, 1516–1530.10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1516CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Clary, EG, Snyder, M & Ridge, R (1992) Volunteers’ motivations: a functional strategy for the recruitment, placement, and retention of volunteers. Nonprofit Manag Leadersh 2, 333–350.10.1002/nml.4130020403CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

StataCorp (2017) Stata Statistical Software: Release 15. College Station, TX: StataCorp LLC.Google Scholar

O’Cathain, A & Thomas, KJ (2004) “Any other comments?” Open questions on questionnaires – a bane or a bonus to research? BMC Med Res Methodol 4, 25.10.1186/1471-2288-4-25CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Maki, A & Snyder, M (2017) Investigating similarities and differences between volunteer behaviors: development of a volunteer interest typology. Nonprofit Volunt Sect Q 46, 5–28.10.1177/0899764015619703CrossRef Google Scholar

Boezeman, EJ & Ellemers, N (2013) Volunteer recruitment. In The Oxford Handbook of Recruitment [Cable, DM & Yu, KYT, editors]. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Butt, MU, Hou, Y, Soomro, KA et al. (2017) The ABCE model of volunteer motivation. J Soc Serv Res 43, 593–608.10.1080/01488376.2017.1355867CrossRef Google Scholar

Hopper, H & Skirton, H (2016) Factors influencing the sustainability of volunteer peer support for breast-feeding mothers within a hospital environment: an exploratory qualitative study. Midwifery 32, 58–65.10.1016/j.midw.2015.09.007CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Biggs, LJ, McLachlan, HL, Shafiei, T et al. (2018) Peer supporters’ experiences on an Australian perinatal mental health helpline. Health Prom Intl 34, 479–489.10.1093/heapro/dax097CrossRef Google Scholar

Jolly, K, Ingram, L, Khan, K et al. (2012) Systematic review of peer support for breastfeeding continuation: meta-regression analysis of the effect of setting, intensity and timing. BMJ 344, d8287.10.1136/bmj.d8287CrossRef Google Scholar

Ingram, J (2013) A mixed methods evaluation of peer support in Bristol, UK: mothers’, midwives’ and peer supporters’ views and the effects on breastfeeding. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 13, 192.10.1186/1471-2393-13-192CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Brown, KM, Hoye, R & Nicholson, M (2012) Self-esteem, self-efficacy, and social connectedness as mediators of the relationship between volunteering and well-being. J Soc Serv Res 38, 468–483.10.1080/01488376.2012.687706CrossRef Google Scholar

Stukas, AA, Snyder, M & Clary, EG (2015) Volunteerism and community involvement: antecedents, experiences, and consequences for the person and the situation. In The Oxford Handbook of Prosocial Behavior [Schroeder, DA & Graziano, WG, editors]. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chacon, F, Vecina, M & Davila, M (2007) The three-stage model of volunteers duration of service. Soc Behav Pers 35, 627–642.10.2224/sbp.2007.35.5.627CrossRef Google Scholar

Grant, A, McEwan, K, Tedstone, S et al. (2018) Availability of breastfeeding peer support in the United Kingdom: a cross-sectional study. Mat Child Nutr 14, e12476.10.1111/mcn.12476CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2019) 6523.0 – Household Income and Wealth, Australia, 2017–18. https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/by%20Subject/6523.0~2017-18~Main%20Features~Key%20Findings~1 (accessed October 2019).Google Scholar

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 12

Total number of PDF views: 40 *

View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 30th June 2020 - 14th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Article contents

Volunteers’ experiences of providing telephone-based breast-feeding peer support in the RUBY randomised controlled trial

Abstract

Keywords

Access options

References

Full text views

Send article to Kindle

Send article to Dropbox

Send article to Google Drive

Reply to: Submit a response

Your details

Conflicting interests