Skip to main content
×
Home

Actual use of a front-of-pack nutrition logo in the supermarket: consumers’ motives in food choice

  • Ellis L Vyth (a1), Ingrid HM Steenhuis (a1), Jessica A Vlot (a1), Anouk Wulp (a1), Meefa G Hogenes (a1), Danielle H Looije (a1), Johannes Brug (a2) and Jacob C Seidell (a1) (a2)...
Abstract
AbstractObjective

A front-of-pack nutrition logo on products with relatively favourable product compositions might help consumers to make more healthful choices. Studies investigating actual nutrition label use in point-of-purchase settings are scarce. The present study investigates the use of the ‘Choices’ nutrition logo in Dutch supermarkets.

Design

Adults were asked to complete a validated questionnaire about motivation for food choice and their purchased products were scored for the Choices logo after they had done their shopping.

Setting

Nine supermarkets in The Netherlands.

Subjects

A total of 404 respondents participated.

Results

Of the respondents, 62 % reported familiarity with the logo. The motivations for food choice that were positively associated with actually purchasing products with the logo were attention to ‘weight control’ and ‘product information’. The food choice motive ‘hedonism’ was negatively associated with purchasing products with the logo.

Conclusions

This is the first study to investigate actual use of the Choices logo. In order to stimulate consumers to purchase more products with a favourable product composition, extra attention should be paid to hedonistic aspects such as the tastefulness and the image of healthy products.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Actual use of a front-of-pack nutrition logo in the supermarket: consumers’ motives in food choice
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Actual use of a front-of-pack nutrition logo in the supermarket: consumers’ motives in food choice
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Actual use of a front-of-pack nutrition logo in the supermarket: consumers’ motives in food choice
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email ellis.vyth@falw.vu.nl
References
Hide All
1.World Health Organization (2003) Diet, Nutrition and the Prevention of Chronic Diseases. Joint WHO/FAO Expert Consultation. WHO Technical Report Series no. 916. Geneva: WHO.
2.Steptoe A, Pollard TM & Wardle J (1995) Development of a measure of the motives underlying the selection of food: the food choice questionnaire. Appetite 25, 267284.
3.Brunsø K & Grunert K (1995) Development and testing of a crossculturally valid instrument: food-related lifestyle. Adv Consum Res 22, 475480.
4.Hoek AC, Luning PA, Stafleu A et al. (2004) Food-related lifestyle and health attitudes of Dutch vegetarians, non-vegetarian consumers of meat substitutes, and meat consumers. Appetite 42, 265272.
5.Scholderer J, Brunso K, Bredahl L et al. (2004) Cross-cultural validity of the food-related lifestyles instrument (FRL) within Western Europe. Appetite 42, 197211.
6.Glanz K, Kristal AR, Sorensen G et al. (1993) Development and validation of measures of psychosocial factors influencing fat- and fiber-related dietary behavior. Prev Med 22, 373387.
7.Roininen K, Lahteenmaki L & Tuorila H (1999) Quantification of consumer attitudes to health and hedonic characteristics of foods. Appetite 33, 7188.
8.European Food Information Council (2005) Nutrition Information & Food Labelling: Results of the EUFIC Consumer Research. Brussels: EUFIC.
9.Grunert KG & Wills JM (2007) A review of European research on consumer response to nutrition information on food labels. J Public Health 15, 384399.
10.Feunekes GI, Gortemaker IA, Willems AA et al. (2008) Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: testing effectiveness of different nutrition labelling formats front-of-pack in four European countries. Appetite 50, 5770.
11.Stockley L (2007) Review of ‘Front of Pack’ Nutrition Schemes. Brussels: European Heart Network.
12.Young L & Swinburn B (2002) Impact of the Pick the Tick food information programme on the salt content of food in New Zealand. Health Promot Int 17, 1319.
13.Vyth EL, Steenhuis IHM, Mallant SF et al. (2009) A front-of-pack nutrition logo: a quantitative and qualitative process evaluation in the Netherlands. J Health Commun 14, 631645.
14.Dötsch-Klerk M & Jansen L (2008) The Choices programme: a simple, front-of-pack stamp making healthy choices easy. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 17, 383386.
15.Grunert KG & Wills JM (2008) Pan-European Consumer Research on In-store Observation, Understanding & Use of Nutrition Information on Food Labels, Combined with Assessing Nutrition Knowledge. Brussels: European Food Information Council.
16.Rayner M, Boaz A & Higginson C (2001) Consumer use of health-related endorsements on food labels in the United Kingdom and Australia. J Nutr Educ 33, 2430.
17.Reid RD, Slovinec D’Angelo ME et al. (2004) The Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada’s Health Check food information program: modelling program effects on consumer behaviour and dietary practices. Can J Public Health 95, 146150.
18.Aase S (2007) Supermarket trends: how increased demand for healthful products and services will affect food and nutrition professionals. J Am Diet Assoc 107, 12861288.
19.Mhurchu CN & Gorton D (2007) Nutrition labels and claims in New Zealand and Australia: a review of use and understanding. Aust N Z J Public Health 31, 105112.
20.Signal L, Lanumata T, Robinson JA et al. (2008) Perceptions of New Zealand nutrition labels by Maori, Pacific and low-income shoppers. Public Health Nutr 11, 706713.
21.Crossley ML & Khan SN (2001) Motives underlying food choice: dentists, porters and dietary health promotion. Br Dent J 191, 198202.
22.Pollard J, Greenwood D, Kirk S et al. (2002) Motivations for fruit and vegetable consumption in the UK Women’s Cohort Study. Public Health Nutr 5, 479486.
23.Pollard TM, Steptoe A & Wardle J (1998) Motives underlying healthy eating: using the Food Choice Questionnaire to explain variation in dietary intake. J Biosoc Sci 30, 165179.
24.Verweij A (2008) Indeling opleidingsniveau. In Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning, Nationaal Kompas Volksgezondheid. Bilthoven: RIVM. http://www.nationaalkompas.nl/bevolking/scholing-en-opleiding/ (accessed May 2009).
25.The European Consumers’ Organisation (2005) Report on European Consumers’ Perception of Foodstuffs Labelling. Brussels: BEUC.
26.Cowburn G & Stockley L (2005) Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 8, 2128.
27.Croft J, Harris F & Hayward W (2002) Health Claims on Food Packaging: Consumer Related Qualitative Research. London: Food Standards Agency.
28.Synovate (2005) Quantitative Evaluation of Alternative Food Signposting Concepts. London: Food Standards Agency.
29.Ree M, Riediger N & Moghadasian MH (2008) Factors affecting food selection in Canadian population. Eur J Clin Nutr 62, 12551262.
30.The Netherlands Nutrition Centre (2005) Nederland in balans: Masterplan preventie overgewicht 2005–2010. The Hague: The Netherlands Nutrition Centre.
31.Wendel-Vos GCW, Nooyens ACJ & Schuit AJ (2004) De bijdrage van leefstijl aan gewichtsstijging bij jongvolwassenen. Bilthoven: RIVM.
32.Verkleij H & van Kreijl C (2004) Beïnvloedbaarheid van de voeding. In Ons eten gemeten, pp. 8991 [C van Kreijl and A Knaap, editors]. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.
33.Raghunathan R, Naylor RW & Hoyer WD (2006) The unhealthy = tasty intuition and its effects on taste inferences, enjoyment, and choice of food products. J Mark 70, 170184.
34.Verbeke W (2006) Functional foods: consumer willingness to compromise on taste for health? Food Qual Prefer 17, 126131.
35.Brug J, Oenema A & Campbell M (2003) Past, present, and future of computer-tailored nutrition education. Am J Clin Nutr 77, 4 Suppl., 1028S1034S.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 17
Total number of PDF views: 395 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 579 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 25th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.