Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-18T10:12:44.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Challenges in translating scientific evidence into mandatory food fortification policy: an antipodean case study of the folate–neural tube defect relationship

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Mark Lawrence*
Affiliation:
School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, 221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, Melbourne, Victoria 3125, Australia
*
*Corresponding author: Email lawrence@deakin.edu.au
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Objective

To identify challenges in translating scientific evidence of a nutrient and health relationship into mandatory food fortification policy.

Design

A case study approach was used in which available evidence associated with the folate–neural tube defect relationship was reviewed against the Australia New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council's Policy Guideline for mandatory food fortification.

Results

Three particular challenges were identified. The first is knowing when and how to act in the face of scientific uncertainty. The second is knowing how to address the special needs of at-risk individuals without compromising the health and safety of the population as a whole. The third is to ensure that a policy is sufficiently monitored and evaluated.

Conclusions

Despite the availability of compelling evidence of a relationship between a particular nutrient and a health outcome, a definitive policy response may not be apparent. Judgement and interpretation inevitably play significant roles in influencing whether and how authorities translate scientific evidence into mandatory food fortification policy. In relation to the case study, it would be prudent to undertake a risk–benefit analysis of policy alternatives and to implement nutrition education activities to promote folic acid supplement use among the target group. Should mandatory folate fortification be implemented, comprehensive monitoring and evaluation of this policy will be essential to know that it is implemented as planned and does more good than harm. In relation to mandatory food fortification policy-making around the world, ongoing national nutrition surveys are required to complement national policy guidelines.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2005

References

1Codex Alimentarius Commission. Codex Alimentarius, Vol. 4. General Principles for the Addition of Essential Nutrients to Foods. Rome: Codex Alimentarius Commission, 1994.Google Scholar
2 Amendment No. 6 to the National Health and Medical Research Council's Food Standards Code. Commonwealth of Australia Gazette 1990; (Aug 27): 29.Google Scholar
3Lewis, J, Broomhead, L, Jupp, P, Reid, J. Nutritional considerations in the development and review of food standards, with particular emphasis on food composition. Food Control 2003; 14: 399407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Wood, B. Thiamin status in Australia. World Review of Nutrition and Dietetics 1985; 46: 148218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5 Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing. Policy Guideline: Fortification of Foods with Vitamins and Minerals. Policy Documents [online]. Food Regulation Secretariat, 2004. Available at http://www.foodsecretariat.health.gov.au. Accessed 21 January 2005.Google Scholar
6 Australia and New Zealand Food Regulation Ministerial Council. Food ministers protect public health, support industry innovation. Joint Communique [online], 24 May 2004. Available at http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/mediareleasespublications/mediareleases/mediareleases 2004/jointcommunique28may2459.cfm. Accessed 18 August 2004.Google Scholar
7Medical Research Council Vitamin Study Research Group. Prevention of neural tube defects: results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study Research Group. Lancet 1991; 338: 131–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Czeizel, A, Dudas, I. Prevention of the first occurrence of neural-tube defects by periconceptional vitamin supplementation. New England Journal of Medicine 1992; 327: 1832–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Lumley, J, Watson, L, Watson, M, Bower, C. Periconceptional supplementation with folate and/or multivitamins for preventing neural tube defects (Cochrane Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2001; (3): CD001056.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
10Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ). Initial Assessment Report, Proposal P295 – Consideration of Mandatory Fortification with Folic Acid 2004 [online]. Canberra FSANZ, 2004. Available at http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/_srcfiles/P295_Folate_fortification_IAR_FINAL.doc. Accessed 20 January 2005.Google Scholar
11Bower, C, Ryan, A, Rudy, E, Miller, M. Trends in neural tube defects in Western Australia. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 2002; 26(2): 150–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12Lawrence, MA, Rutishauser, IHE, Lewis, JL. An analysis of the introduction of folate-fortified food products into stores in Australia. Australian Journal of Nutrition and Dietetics 1999; 56: 1521.Google Scholar
13Bower, C, Blum, L, O'Daly, K, Higgins, C, Loutsky, F, Kosky, C. Promotion of folate for the prevention of neural tube defects: knowledge and use of periconceptional folic acid supplements in Western Australia, 1992–1995. [Published erratum appears in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 1998; 22: 72]. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health. 1997; 21: 716–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Institute of Medicine. Folate. In: Dietary Reference Intakes for Thiamin, Riboflavin, Niacin, Vitamin B6, Folate, Vitamin B12, Pantothenic Acid, Biotin, and Choline. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1998; 198305.Google Scholar
15Quinlivan, EP, Gregory, JF III. Effect of food fortification on folic acid intake in the United States. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 2003; 77: 221–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Yetley, AE, Rader, JI. Modeling the level of fortification and post-fortification assessments: US experience. Nutrition Reviews 2004; 62: S50–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
17Smith, R. Editor's choice: ‘Let food be thy medicine...’. British Medical Journal 2004; 328: 7433.Google Scholar
18Expert Panel on Folate Fortification. Folate Fortification. Canberra: National Health and Medical Research Council, 1995.Google Scholar
19Abraham, B, Webb, K. Interim Evaluation of the Voluntary Folate Fortification Policy. Canberra: Australian Food and Nutrition Monitoring Unit, 2001.Google Scholar
20Lucock, MD, Yates, Z. A differential role for folate in developmental disorders, vascular disease and other clinical conditions: the importance of folate status and genotype. In: Massaro, EJ, ed. Folate and Human Development. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2001; 263–98.Google Scholar
21Shane, B. Folate fortification: enough already?. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 2003; 77: 89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Mills, JL. Fortification of foods with folic acid – how much is enough?. New England Journal of Medicine 2000; 342: 1442–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ). Annual Report 2003–2004. Canberra: FSANZ, 2004.Google Scholar
24 Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing, Australia/Ministry of Health, New Zealand/National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia. Draft Nutrient Reference Values for Australia and New Zealand including Recommended Dietary Intakes [online], 2005. Available at http://www.nhmrc.gov.au/advice/pdf/nrvf.pdf. Accessed 20 January 2005.Google Scholar
25Food Standards Australia New Zealand (FSANZ). Fortification Implementation Framework (Draft), Addition of Vitamins and Minerals to Food, November 2004 [online] Canberra: FSANZ, 2004 Available at http://www.foodstandards.gov.au/_srcfiles/Item%205%20Framework.pdf. Accessed 20 January 2005.Google Scholar
26Food and Drug Administration. Food standards: amendment of standards of identity for enriched grain products to require addition of folic acid. Final rule. 21 CFR Parts 136, 137, and 139. Federal Register 1996; 61: 8781–807.Google Scholar
27Health Canada. Regulations amending the Food and Drug Regulations (1066). Canada Gazette Part 1 1997; 131: 3702–37.Google Scholar
28The Health Council of the Netherlands. The Hague. Care needed with folic acid fortification. Network 2001; 16(1).Google Scholar
29Rasmussen, LB, Andersen, NL, Andersson, G, Lange, AP, Rasmussen, K, Skak-Iversen, L, et al. Folate and neural tube defects. Recommendations from a Danish working group. Danish Medical Bulletin 1998; 45: 213–7.Google ScholarPubMed
30 Food Standards Agency (UK). Board reaches conclusion on folic acid, Friday, 10 05 2002 [online]. Available at http://www.food.gov.uk/news/newsarchive/2002/may/62488. Accessed 20 January 2005.Google Scholar