Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

A commentary on current practice in mediating variable analyses in behavioural nutrition and physical activity

  • Ester Cerin (a1) and David P MacKinnon (a2)
Abstract
AbstractObjective

To critique current practice in, and provide recommendations for, mediating variable analyses (MVA) of nutrition and physical activity behaviour change.

Strategy

Theory-based behavioural nutrition and physical activity interventions aim at changing mediating variables that are hypothesized to be responsible for changes in the outcome of interest. MVA are useful because they help to identify the most promising theoretical approaches, mediators and intervention components for behaviour change. However, the current literature suggests that MVA are often inappropriately conducted, poorly understood and inadequately presented. Main problems encountered in the published literature are explained and suggestions for overcoming weaknesses of current practice are proposed.

Conclusion

The use of the most appropriate, currently available methods of MVA, and a correct, comprehensive presentation and interpretation of their findings, is of paramount importance for understanding how obesity can be treated and prevented.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      A commentary on current practice in mediating variable analyses in behavioural nutrition and physical activity
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      A commentary on current practice in mediating variable analyses in behavioural nutrition and physical activity
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      A commentary on current practice in mediating variable analyses in behavioural nutrition and physical activity
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email cerin@bcm.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

1.MA Flynn , DA McNeil , B Maloff , D Mutasingwa , M Wu , C Ford & SC Tough (2006) Reducing obesity and related chronic disease risk in children and youth: a synthesis of evidence with ‘best practice’ recommendations. Obes Rev 7, Suppl. 1, 766.

2.T Baranowski , C Anderson & C Carmack (1998) Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions: how are we doing? How might we do better? Am J Prev Med 15, 266297.

3.RM Baron & DA Kenny (1986) The moderator–mediator distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 51, 11731182.

5.Y Miller , S Trost & W Brown (2002) Mediators of physical activity behavior among women with young children. Am J Prev Med 23, 2 Suppl., 98103.

7.BM Pinto , H Lynn , BH Marcus , J DePue & MG Goldstein (2001) Physician-based activity counseling: intervention effects on mediators of motivational readiness for physical activity. Ann Behav Med 23, 210.

8.TR Prodaniuk , RC Plotnikoff , JC Spence & PM Wilson (2004) The influence of self-efficacy and outcome expectations on the relationship between perceived environment and physical activity in the workplace. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 1, 7.

11.DP MacKinnon , AJ Fairchild & MS Fritz (2007) Mediation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol 58, 593614.

12.DP MacKinnon , CM Lockwood , JM Hoffman , SG West & V Sheet (2002) A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. Psychol Methods 7, 83103.

13.E Cerin , LM Taylor , E Leslie & N Owen (2006) Small-scale randomized controlled trials need more powerful methods of mediational analysis than the Baron–Kenny method. J Clin Epidemiol 59, 457464.

15.DP MacKinnon , CM Lockwood , CH Brown , W Wang & JM Hoffman (2007) The intermediate endpoint effect in logistic and probit regression. Clin Trials 4, 499513.

16.ME Sobel (1982) Asymptotic confidence intervals for indirect effects in structural equation models. In Sociological Methodology, pp. 290–312 [S Leinhardt, editor]. Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.

17.KA Bollen & R Stine (1990) Direct and indirect effects: classical and bootstrap estimates of variability. Sociol Methodol 20, 115140.

18.MS Fritz & DP MacKinnon (2007) Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychol Sci 18, 233239.

19.PE Shrout & N Bolger (2002) Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: new procedures and recommendations. Psychol Methods 7, 422445.

20.DP MacKinnon , MS Fritz , J Williams & CM Lockwood (2007) Distribution of the product confidence limits for the indirect effect: program PRODCLIN. Behav Res Methods 39, 384389.

21.KJ Preacher & AF Hayes (2004) SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput 36, 717731.

22.B Efron & TJ Tibshirani (1993) An Introduction to the Bootstrap. New York: Chapman & Hall.

23.KA Pituch , LM Stapleton & JY Kang (2006) A comparison for single sample and bootstrap methods to assess mediation in cluster randomized trials. Multivariate Behav Res 41, 367400.

24.E Cerin & E Leslie (2008) How socio-economic status contributes to participation in leisure-time physical activity. Soc Sci Med 66, 25962609.

25.CM Judd & DA Kenny (1981) Process analysis: estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Eval Rev 5, 602619.

26.H Kraemer , G Wilson , C Fairburn & W Agras (2002) Mediators and moderators of treatment effects in randomized clinical trials. Arch Gen Psychiatry 59, 877883.

27.DP MacKinnon , JL Krull & CM Lockwood (2000) Equivalence of mediation, confounding and suppression effects. Prev Sci 1, 173181.

28.K Meltzer , B Kayser , WHM Saris & C Pichard (2005) Effects of physical activity on food intake. Clin Nutr 24, 885895.

29.L Haerens , E Cerin , B Deforche , L Maes & I De Bourdeaudhuij (2007) Explaining the effects of a 1-year intervention promoting a low fat diet in adolescent girls: a mediation analysis. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 4, 55.

30.T Baranowski , DD Allen , LC Masse & M Wilson (2006) Does participation in an intervention affect responses on self-report questionnaires? Health Educ Res 21, 98109.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: