Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Are the lowest-cost healthful food plans culturally and socially acceptable?

  • Matthieu Maillot (a1) (a2) (a3), Nicole Darmon (a1) (a2) (a3) and Adam Drewnowski (a4)
Abstract
AbstractObjective

Nutritious yet inexpensive foods do exist. However, many such foods are rejected by the low-income consumer. Is it because their use violates unspoken social norms? The present study was designed to assess the variety and cost of the lowest-cost market basket of foods that simultaneously met required dietary standards and progressively stricter consumption constraints.

Design

A mathematical optimisation model was used to develop the lowest-cost food plans to meet three levels of nutritional requirements and seven levels of consumption constraints.

Subjects

The nationally representative INCA (National Individual Survey of Food Consumption) dietary survey study of 1332 adults provided population estimates of food consumption patterns in France. Food plan costs were based on retail food prices.

Results

The lowest-cost food plans that provided 9204 kJ/d (2200 kcal/d) for men and 7531 kJ/d (1800 kcal/d) for women and met specified dietary standards could be obtained for <1·50 €/d. The progressive imposition of consumption constraints designed to create more mainstream French diets sharply increased food plan costs, without improving nutritional value.

Conclusions

Minimising diet costs, while meeting nutrition standards only, led to food plans that provided little variety and deviated substantially from social norms. Aligning the food plan with mainstream consumption led to higher costs. Food plans designed for low-income groups need to be socially acceptable as well as affordable and nutritious.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Are the lowest-cost healthful food plans culturally and socially acceptable?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Are the lowest-cost healthful food plans culturally and socially acceptable?
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Are the lowest-cost healthful food plans culturally and socially acceptable?
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email adamdrew@u.washington.edu
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

3.JP Mackenbach , I Stirbu , AJ Roskam (2008) Socioeconomic inequalities in health in 22 European countries. N Engl J Med 358, 24682481.

6.M Reicks , JL Randall & BJ Haynes (1994) Factors affecting consumption of fruits and vegetables by low-income families. J Am Diet Assoc 94, 13091311.

11.N Darmon , M Darmon , M Maillot (2005) A nutrient density standard for vegetables and fruits: nutrients per calorie and nutrients per unit cost. J Am Diet Assoc 105, 18811887.

13.GJ Stigler (1945) The cost of subsistence. J Farm Econ 27, 303314.

19.AE Black (2000) Critical evaluation of energy intake using the Goldberg cut-off for energy intake:basal metabolic rate. A practical guide to its calculation, use and limitations. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24, 11191130.

26.A Briend , N Darmon , E Ferguson (2003) Linear programming: a mathematical tool for analyzing and optimizing children’s diets during the complementary feeding period. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 36, 1222.

28.J Foytik (1981) Very low-cost nutritious diet plans designed by linear programming. J Nutr Educ 13, 6366.

29.N Darmon , EL Ferguson & A Briend (2006) Impact of a cost constraint on nutritionally adequate food choices for French women: an analysis by linear programming. J Nutr Educ Behav 38, 8290.

33.M Chilton & D Rose (2009) A rights-based approach to food insecurity in the United States. Am J Public Health 99, 12031211.

35.H Henry , K Reimer , C Smith (2006) Associations of decisional balance, processes of change, and self-efficacy with stages of change for increased fruit and vegetable intake among low-income, African-American mothers. J Am Diet Assoc 106, 841849.

36.JN Variyam , J Blaylock & DM Smallwood (1996) Modelling nutrition knowledge, attitudes, and diet–disease awareness: the case of dietary fibre. Stat Med 15, 2335.

37.HA Raynor , CK Kilanowski , I Esterlis (2002) A cost-analysis of adopting a healthful diet in a family-based obesity treatment program. J Am Diet Assoc 102, 645656.

38.J Burney & B Haughton (2002) EFNEP: a nutrition education program that demonstrates cost-benefit. J Am Diet Assoc 102, 3945.

39.DC Mitchell , BM Shannon , J McKenzie (2000) Lower fat diets for children did not increase food costs. J Nutr Educ 32, 100103.

40.AM Ottelin , J Lindstrom , M Peltonen (2007) Costs of a self-selected, health-promoting diet among the participants of the Finnish Diabetes Prevention Study. Diabetes Care 30, 12751277.

43.E Andrieu , N Darmon & A Drewnowski (2006) Low-cost diets: more energy, fewer nutrients. Eur J Clin Nutr 60, 434436.

45.H Schroder , J Marrugat & MI Covas (2006) High monetary costs of dietary patterns associated with lower body mass index: a population-based study. Int J Obes (Lond) 30, 15741579.

47.P Monsivais & A Drewnowski (2009) Lower-energy-density diets are associated with higher monetary costs per kilocalorie and are consumed by women of higher socioeconomic status. J Am Diet Assoc 109, 814822.

48.MS Townsend , GJ Aaron , P Monsivais (2009) Less-energy-dense diets of low-income women in California are associated with higher energy-adjusted diet costs. Am J Clin Nutr 89, 12201226.

50.JN Morris , AJ Donkin , D Wonderling (2000) A minimum income for healthy living. J Epidemiol Commun Health 54, 885889.

52.C McLaughlin , V Tarasuk & N Kreiger (2003) An examination of at-home food preparation activity among low-income, food-insecure women. J Am Diet Assoc 103, 15061512.

53.PA Crotty , IH Rutishauser & M Cahill (1992) Food in low-income families. Aust J Public Health 16, 168174.

55.DK Grant & S Maxwell (1999) Food coping strategies: a century on from Rowntree. Nutr Health 13, 4560.

56.H Stewart & N Blisard (2006) The thrifty food plan and low-income households in the United States: what food groups are being neglegted? Food Policy 31, 469482.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score