Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Parent's responses to nutrient claims and sports celebrity endorsements on energy-dense and nutrient-poor foods: an experimental study

  • Helen Dixon (a1), Maree Scully (a1), Melanie Wakefield (a1), Bridget Kelly (a2), Kathy Chapman (a3) and Robert Donovan (a4)...
Abstract
AbstractObjective

To assess parents’ responses to common, potentially misleading strategies for marketing energy-dense and nutrient-poor (EDNP) child-oriented foods.

Design

Between-subjects online experiment to test whether nutrient claims and sports celebrity endorsements on the front of packs of EDNP products lead parents to prefer and rate these foods more favourably.

Setting

Australia.

Subjects

A total of 1551 parents of children aged 5–12 years, who were the main household grocery buyers.

Results

Inclusion of nutrient claims or sports celebrity endorsements on EDNP products led parents to perceive these products to be more nutritious than if they did not include such promotions. When asked to choose between a pair of different products (EDNP v. healthier), 56 % of parents did not read a nutrition information panel (NIP) before making their choice and this did not differ by promotion condition. These parents were more likely to choose an EDNP product if it included a nutrient claim (OR = 1·83, 95 % CI 1·31, 2·56; P < 0·001) or sports celebrity endorsement (OR = 2·37, 95 % CI 1·70, 3·32; P < 0·001). Sports celebrity endorsements also enhanced parent's perceptions of typical consumers of the product, perceptions of product healthiness and quality, as well as purchase intentions.

Conclusions

Nutrient claims and sports celebrity endorsements tip consumer preferences towards EDNP products bearing such promotions, especially among the majority who do not read the NIP. As parents largely determine what foods are available to children at home, it is critical that initiatives aimed at reducing the persuasive impact of food marketing include this target group.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Parent's responses to nutrient claims and sports celebrity endorsements on energy-dense and nutrient-poor foods: an experimental study
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Parent's responses to nutrient claims and sports celebrity endorsements on energy-dense and nutrient-poor foods: an experimental study
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Parent's responses to nutrient claims and sports celebrity endorsements on energy-dense and nutrient-poor foods: an experimental study
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email Melanie.Wakefield@cancervic.org.au
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

4.R Brown & J Ogden (2004) Children's eating attitudes and behaviour: a study of the modelling and control theories of parental influence. Health Educ Res 19, 261271.

5.KJ Campbell , DA Crawford , J Salmon (2007) Associations between the home food environment and obesity-promoting eating behaviours in adolescence. Obesity (Silver Spring) 15, 719730.

6.M Story , D Neumark-Sztainer & S French (2002) Individual and environmental influences on adolescent eating behaviours. J Am Diet Assoc 102, Suppl. 3, S40S51.

7.B Morley , K Chapman , K Mehta (2008) Parental awareness and attitudes about food advertising to children on Australian television. Aust N Z J Public Health 32, 341347.

8.B Kelly , K Chapman , LL Hardy (2009) Parental awareness and attitudes of food marketing to children: a community attitudes survey of parents in New South Wales, Australia. J Paediatr Child Health 45, 493497.

11.C Byrd-Bredbenner , C Wong & P Cottee (2000) Consumer understanding of US and EU nutrition labels. Br Food J 102, 615629.

12.G Cowburn & L Stockley (2005) Consumer understanding and use of nutrition labelling: a systematic review. Public Health Nutr 8, 2128.

13.GI Feunekes , IA Gortemaker , AA Willems (2008) Front-of-pack nutrition labelling: testing effectiveness of different nutrition labelling formats front-of-pack in four European countries. Appetite 50, 5770.

14.G Jones & M Richardson (2007) An objective examination of consumer perception of nutrition information based on healthiness ratings and eye movements. Public Health Nutr 10, 238244.

21.R Ohanian (1990) Construction and validation of a scale to measure celebrity endorsers’ perceived expertise, trustworthiness, and attractiveness. J Advert 19, 3952.

27.MA Wakefield , D Germain & SJ Durkin (2008) How does increasingly plainer cigarette packaging influence adult smokers’ perceptions about brand image? An experimental study. Tob Control 17, 416421.

28.A d'Astous & I Jacob (2002) Understanding consumer reactions to premium-based promotional offers. Eur J Mark 36, 12701286.

29.JC Andrews , S Burton & RG Netemeyer (2000) Are some comparative nutrition claims misleading? The role of nutrition knowledge, ad claim type and disclosure conditions. J Advert 29, 2942.

30.C Pechmann & C-F Shih (1999) Smoking scenes in movies and antismoking advertisements before movies: effects on youth. J Mark 63, 113.

33.B Kelly , C Hughes , K Chapman (2009) Consumer testing of the acceptability and effectiveness of front-of-pack food labelling systems for the Australian grocery market. Health Promot Int 24, 120129.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: