Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

The cognitive contexts of beliefs about the healthiness of meat

  • Emma Lea (a1) and Anthony Worsley (a2)
Abstract
AbstractObjective:

The overall aim of this study was to examine a variety of belief and demographic factors that are associated with the perception that meat is intrinsically unhealthy.

Design:

State-wide survey (written questionnaire) that included questions on meat and nutrition beliefs, perceived barriers and benefits of vegetarian diets, personal values, number of vegetarian friends and family members, and use and trust of health/nutrition/food information sources.

Setting:

South Australia.

Subjects:

Six hundred and one randomly selected South Australians and 106 non-randomly selected vegetarians and semi-vegetarians.

Results:

For all respondents considered as a group, the most important predictors of the belief that meat is intrinsically unhealthy were the perceived benefits of vegetarian diets (all positive predictors). These included: (1) the perceived links between vegetarianism, peace and increased contentment; (2) animal welfare and environmental benefits; and (3) health benefits. There were differences between different dietary groups however. For non-vegetarians, social concerns about vegetarianism (positive) were most important, followed by health and non-health benefits (positive) of vegetarianism. Red meat appreciation was the strongest (positive) predictor for vegetarians, with health benefits of vegetarianism (positive) and education (negative predictor) also important.

Conclusions:

The implications of the findings for health and other issues are discussed. Judgements about the healthiness of meat are likely to be related to moral and environmental beliefs and, for non-vegetarians, to social concerns about vegetarianism, in addition to health beliefs. These need to be considered if any attempts are made to influence meat consumption.

    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      The cognitive contexts of beliefs about the healthiness of meat
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      The cognitive contexts of beliefs about the healthiness of meat
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      The cognitive contexts of beliefs about the healthiness of meat
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email emma_lea@hotmail.com
Linked references
Hide All

This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.

5American Dietetic Association. Position of the American Dietetic Association: vegetarian diets. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1997; 97(11): 1317–21.

10JI Mann . Optimizing the plant-based diet. Asia Pacific J. Clin. Nutr. 2000; 9(Suppl. 1): 60S–4S.

11JT Dwyer . Nutritional consequences of vegetarianism. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 1991; 11: 6191.

16D Pimentel , J Houser , E Preiss , O White . Water resources: agriculture, the environment, and society. BioScience 1997; 47(2), 97106.

18SG Sapp . Impact of nutritional knowledge within an expanded rational expectations model of beef consumption. J. Nutr. Educ. 1991; 23(5): 214–22.

19E Lea , A Worsley . Influences on meat consumption in Australia. Appetite 2001; 36(2): 127–36.

20NJ Richardson , R Shepherd , NA Elliman . Current attitudes and future influences on meat consumption in the UK. Appetite 1993; 21: 4151.

21A Worsley , G Skrzypiec . Do attitudes predict red meat consumption among young people? Ecol. Food Nutr. 1998; 37: 163–95.

24IM Rosenstock . Historical origins of the Health Belief Model. Health Educ. Monographs 1974; 2(4): 328–35.

30WA McIntosh , RD Fletcher , KS Kubena , WA Landmann . Factors associated with sources of influence/information in reducing red meat by elderly subjects. Appetite 1995; 24: 219–30.

31SH Schwartz . Universals in the content and structure of values: theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1992; 25: 165.

34A Worsley , V Scott . Consumers' concerns about food and health in Australia and New Zealand. Asia Pacific J. Clin. Nutr. 2000; 9(1): 2432.

40L Holm , M Møhl . The role of meat in everyday food culture: an analysis of an interview study in Copenhagen. Appetite 2000; 34: 277–83.

41D Frey . Recent research on selective exposure to information. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1986; 19: 4180.

42F Heider . Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychol. Rev. 1944; 51: 358–74.

44K Parmenter , J Waller , J Wardle . Demographic variation in nutrition knowledge in England. Health Educ. Res. 2000; 15(2): 163–74.

45JN Variyam , J Blaylock , DM Smallwood . Modelling nutrition knowledge, attitudes, and diet–disease awareness: the case of dietary fibre. Stat. Med. 1996; 15(1): 2335.

Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords: