Skip to main content
×
Home
    • Aa
    • Aa

Effect of a fruit and vegetable subscription in Danish schools

  • Karen Eriksen (a1) (a2), Jóhanna Haraldsdóttir (a2), Robert Pederson (a1) and Hanne Vig Flyger (a1)
Abstract
AbstractObjective:

To measure the effect of a school fruit and vegetable subscription on children's intake of fruit and vegetables after 5 weeks of intervention.

Setting:

Seven primary schools in Denmark.

Design and methods: Intervention schools (n = 4) were offered a fruit and vegetable subscription comprising one piece per day. Control schools (n = 3) situated in another municipality were not offered the subscription. Intake of fruit and vegetables was measured at baseline and 5 weeks after the start of the subscription. Two methods were used for dietary assessment: a pre-coded 24-hour recall form including total food intake and a food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) including only fruit and vegetables.

Subjects:

Children aged 6–10 years (n = 804 from intervention schools and n = 689 from control schools). Response rate in the dietary assessment was 31%.

Results:

At intervention schools 45% of the children enrolled in the subscription. After 5 weeks of intervention, both subscribers and non-subscribers had increased their intake of fruit by 0.4 (P = 0.019) and 0.3 (P = 0.008) pieces per school day, respectively, but no change was observed in vegetable intake. Total intake increased only for non-subscribers by 0.4 piece/school day (P = 0.008), mainly due to the consistent increase in fruit intake. No change in intake was measured at control schools. Only the 24-hour recall questionnaire was sensitive enough to pick up the changes of the subscription, whereas the FFQ was not.

Conclusion:

Five weeks with the subscription affected both subscribers and non-subscribers to increase intake of fruit. This may indicate that the subscription had an additional effect of stimulating parents of non-subscribers to supply their children with fruit. The results stress the importance of evaluating the effect of this type of programme, and the carefulness needed in designing the evaluation study.

Copyright
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email Karen@cancer.dk
References
Hide All
1van't Veer P, Jansen MC, Klerk M, et al. Fruits and vegetables in the prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease. Public Health Nutr. 2000; 3: 103–7.
2Block G, Patterson B, Subar A. Fruit, vegetables, and cancer prevention: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutr. Cancer 1992; 18: 129.
3Ness AR, Powles JW. Fruit and vegetables, and cardiovascular disease: a review. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1997; 26: 113.
4Foerster SHJ, Di Sogra LK, Pivonka E. The national 5 a day for better health program: an American nutrition and cancer initiative. In: Wheelock V, ed. Implementing Dietary Guidelines for Healthy Eating. London: Chapman & Hall, 1997; 447–79.
5Statens Ernæringråd. Recommendations for Increased Intake of Fruit and Vegetables [in Norwegian] Oslo: Statens Ernæringråd, 1996.
6Williams C. Healthy eating: clarifying advice about fruit and vegetables [published erratum appears in Br. Med. J. 1995; 310: 1665]. Br. Med. J. 1995; 310: 1453–5.
7Trolle E, Fagt S, Ovesen L. Fruit and Vegetables, Recommendations for Intake [in Danish] . Publication No. 244.Copenhagen: Veterinær og Fødvaredirektoratet (Danish Veterinary and Food Administation), 1998.
8Andersen D, Fagt S, Groth MV, et al. Danish Dietary Habits 1995, Main Results [in Danish with an English summary]. Publication No. 235.Copenhagen: Levenedsmiddelstyrelen (National Food Agency), 1996.
9 National Council on Nutrition and Physical Activity, Norwegian Fruit and Vegetable Marketing Board. School Participation, Who Participates [online]. Available at http://www.skolefrukt.net/fakta/fakta_eng.html. Accessed February 2002.
10 Department of Health. The National School Fruit Scheme [online]. Available at http://www.doh.gov.uk/schoolfruitscheme/. Accessed February 2002.
11Serdula M, Coates R, Byers T, et al. Evaluation of a brief telephone questionnaire to estimate fruit and vegetable consumption in diverse study populations. Epidemiology 1993; 4: 455–63.
12Smith-Warner SA, Elmer PJ, Fosdick L, et al. Reliability and comparability of three dietary assessment methods for estimating fruit and vegetable intakes. Epidemiology 1997; 8: 196201.
13Thompson B, Demark-Wahnefried W, Taylor G, et al. Baseline fruit and vegetable intake among adults in seven 5 a day study centers located in diverse geographic areas. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1999; 99: 1241–8.
14Haraldsdottir J, Holm L, Astrup A, et al. Monitoring of dietary changes by telephone interviews: results from Denmark. Public Health Nutr. 2001; 4: 1287–95.
15Andersen D, Hestbæk AD. Responsibility and Values in Danish Families [in Danish]. Copenhagen: Socialforskningsinstitutet (The Danish National Institute of Social Research), 1999.
16Davis M, Baranowski T, Resnicow K, et al. Gimme 5 fruit and vegetables for fun and health: process evaluation. Health Educ. Behav. 2000; 27: 167–76.
17Reynolds KD, Franklin FA, Leviton LC, et al. Methods, results, and lessons learned from process evaluation of the high 5 school-based nutrition intervention. Health Educ. Behav. 2000; 27: 177–86.
18Story M, Mays RW, Bishop DB, et al. 5-a-day Power Plus: process evaluation of a multicomponent elementary school program to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. Health Educ. Behav. 2000; 27: 187200.
19Baranowski T, Davis M, Resnicow K, et al. Gimme 5 fruit, juice, and vegetables for fun and health: outcome evaluation [published erratum appears in Health Educ. Behav. 2000; 27: 390]. Health Educ. Behav. 2000; 27: 96111.
20Reynolds KD, Franklin FA, Binkley D, et al. Increasing the fruit and vegetable consumption of fourth-graders: results from the high 5 project. Prev. Med. 2000; 30: 309–19.
21Gortmaker SL, Cheung LW, Peterson KE, et al. Impact of a school-based interdisciplinary intervention on diet and physical activity among urban primary school children: eat well and keep moving. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 1999; 153: 975–83.
22Manios Y, Moschandreas J, Hatzis C, et al. Evaluation of a health and nutrition education program in primary school children of Crete over a three-year period. Prev. Med. 1999; 28: 149–59.
23Nader PR, Stone EJ, Lytle LA, et al. Three-year maintenance of improved diet and physical activity: the CATCH cohort. Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 1999; 153: 695704.
24Willett WC, Lenart E. Reproducibility and validity of food-frequency questionnaires. In: Willett WC, ed. Nutritional Epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998; 101–47.
25Wheeler C, Rutishauser I, Conn J, et al. Reproducibility of a meal-based food frequency questionnaire. The influence of format and time interval between questionnaires. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1994; 48: 795809.
26Radimer KL, Harvey P, Lytle L. Correspondence of self-reported fruit and vegetable intake with dietary intake data. Aust. N.Z. J. Public Health 1997; 21: 703–10.
27Field AE, Peterson KE, Gortmaker SL, et al. Reproducibility and validity of a food frequency questionnaire among fourth to seventh grade inner-city school children: implications of age and day-to-day variation in dietary intake. Public Health Nutr. 1999; 2: 293300.
28Bergstrand R, Vedin A, Wilhelmsson C, et al. Bias due to non-participation and heterogeneous sub-groups in population surveys. J. Chronic Dis. 1983; 36: 725–8.
29Sonne-Holm S, Sorensen TI, Jensen G, et al. Influence of fatness, intelligence, education and sociodemographic factors on response rate in a health survey. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 1989; 43: 369–74.
30Jackson R, Chambless LE, Yang K, et al. Differences between respondents and nonrespondents in a multicenter community-based study vary by gender ethnicity. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1996; 49: 1441–6.
31Hill A, Roberts J, Ewings P, et al. Non-response bias in a lifestyle survey. J. Public Health Med. 1997; 19: 203–7.
32Lerman Y, Shemer J. Epidemiologic characteristics of participants and nonparticipants in health-promotion programs. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 1996; 38: 535–8.
33Nicklas TA, Johnson CC, Myers L, et al. Outcomes of a high school program to increase fruit and vegetable consumption: Gimme 5 – a fresh nutrition concept for students. J. Sch. Health 1998; 68: 248–53.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 6 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 120 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 22nd October 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.