1van't Veer P, Jansen MC, Klerk M, et al. Fruits and vegetables in the prevention of cancer and cardiovascular disease. Public Health Nutr. 2000; 3: 103–7.
2Block G, Patterson B, Subar A. Fruit, vegetables, and cancer prevention: a review of the epidemiological evidence. Nutr. Cancer 1992; 18: 1–29.
3Ness AR, Powles JW. Fruit and vegetables, and cardiovascular disease: a review. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1997; 26: 1–13.
4Foerster SHJ, Di Sogra LK, Pivonka E. The national 5 a day for better health program: an American nutrition and cancer initiative. In: Wheelock V, ed. Implementing Dietary Guidelines for Healthy Eating. London: Chapman & Hall, 1997; 447–79.
5Statens Ernæringråd. Recommendations for Increased Intake of Fruit and Vegetables [in Norwegian] Oslo: Statens Ernæringråd, 1996.
6Williams C. Healthy eating: clarifying advice about fruit and vegetables [published erratum appears in Br. Med. J. 1995; 310: 1665]. Br. Med. J. 1995; 310: 1453–5.
7Trolle E, Fagt S, Ovesen L. Fruit and Vegetables, Recommendations for Intake [in Danish] . Publication No. 244.Copenhagen: Veterinær og Fødvaredirektoratet (Danish Veterinary and Food Administation), 1998.
8Andersen D, Fagt S, Groth MV, et al. Danish Dietary Habits 1995, Main Results [in Danish with an English summary]. Publication No. 235.Copenhagen: Levenedsmiddelstyrelen (National Food Agency), 1996.
9 National Council on Nutrition and Physical Activity, Norwegian Fruit and Vegetable Marketing Board. School Participation, Who Participates [online]. Available at http://www.skolefrukt.net/fakta/fakta_eng.html. Accessed February 2002.
11Serdula M, Coates R, Byers T, et al. Evaluation of a brief telephone questionnaire to estimate fruit and vegetable consumption in diverse study populations. Epidemiology 1993; 4: 455–63.
12Smith-Warner SA, Elmer PJ, Fosdick L, et al. Reliability and comparability of three dietary assessment methods for estimating fruit and vegetable intakes. Epidemiology 1997; 8: 196–201.
13Thompson B, Demark-Wahnefried W, Taylor G, et al. Baseline fruit and vegetable intake among adults in seven 5 a day study centers located in diverse geographic areas. J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 1999; 99: 1241–8.
14Haraldsdottir J, Holm L, Astrup A, et al. Monitoring of dietary changes by telephone interviews: results from Denmark. Public Health Nutr. 2001; 4: 1287–95.
15Andersen D, Hestbæk AD. Responsibility and Values in Danish Families [in Danish]. Copenhagen: Socialforskningsinstitutet (The Danish National Institute of Social Research), 1999.
16Davis M, Baranowski T, Resnicow K, et al. Gimme 5 fruit and vegetables for fun and health: process evaluation. Health Educ. Behav. 2000; 27: 167–76.
17Reynolds KD, Franklin FA, Leviton LC, et al. Methods, results, and lessons learned from process evaluation of the high 5 school-based nutrition intervention. Health Educ. Behav. 2000; 27: 177–86.
18Story M, Mays RW, Bishop DB, et al. 5-a-day Power Plus: process evaluation of a multicomponent elementary school program to increase fruit and vegetable consumption. Health Educ. Behav. 2000; 27: 187–200.
19Baranowski T, Davis M, Resnicow K, et al. Gimme 5 fruit, juice, and vegetables for fun and health: outcome evaluation [published erratum appears in Health Educ. Behav. 2000; 27: 390]. Health Educ. Behav. 2000; 27: 96–111.
20Reynolds KD, Franklin FA, Binkley D, et al. Increasing the fruit and vegetable consumption of fourth-graders: results from the high 5 project. Prev. Med. 2000; 30: 309–19.
21Gortmaker SL, Cheung LW, Peterson KE, et al. Impact of a school-based interdisciplinary intervention on diet and physical activity among urban primary school children: eat well and keep moving. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 1999; 153: 975–83.
22Manios Y, Moschandreas J, Hatzis C, et al. Evaluation of a health and nutrition education program in primary school children of Crete over a three-year period. Prev. Med. 1999; 28: 149–59.
23Nader PR, Stone EJ, Lytle LA, et al. Three-year maintenance of improved diet and physical activity: the CATCH cohort. Child and Adolescent Trial for Cardiovascular Health. Arch. Pediatr. Adolesc. Med. 1999; 153: 695–704.
24Willett WC, Lenart E. Reproducibility and validity of food-frequency questionnaires. In: Willett WC, ed. Nutritional Epidemiology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998; 101–47.
25Wheeler C, Rutishauser I, Conn J, et al. Reproducibility of a meal-based food frequency questionnaire. The influence of format and time interval between questionnaires. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 1994; 48: 795–809.
26Radimer KL, Harvey P, Lytle L. Correspondence of self-reported fruit and vegetable intake with dietary intake data. Aust. N.Z. J. Public Health 1997; 21: 703–10.
27Field AE, Peterson KE, Gortmaker SL, et al. Reproducibility and validity of a food frequency questionnaire among fourth to seventh grade inner-city school children: implications of age and day-to-day variation in dietary intake. Public Health Nutr. 1999; 2: 293–300.
28Bergstrand R, Vedin A, Wilhelmsson C, et al. Bias due to non-participation and heterogeneous sub-groups in population surveys. J. Chronic Dis. 1983; 36: 725–8.
29Sonne-Holm S, Sorensen TI, Jensen G, et al. Influence of fatness, intelligence, education and sociodemographic factors on response rate in a health survey. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 1989; 43: 369–74.
30Jackson R, Chambless LE, Yang K, et al. Differences between respondents and nonrespondents in a multicenter community-based study vary by gender ethnicity. The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study Investigators. J. Clin. Epidemiol. 1996; 49: 1441–6.
31Hill A, Roberts J, Ewings P, et al. Non-response bias in a lifestyle survey. J. Public Health Med. 1997; 19: 203–7.
32Lerman Y, Shemer J. Epidemiologic characteristics of participants and nonparticipants in health-promotion programs. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 1996; 38: 535–8.
33Nicklas TA, Johnson CC, Myers L, et al. Outcomes of a high school program to increase fruit and vegetable consumption: Gimme 5 – a fresh nutrition concept for students. J. Sch. Health 1998; 68: 248–53.