Baxter, Suzanne D. Hitchcock, David B. Royer, Julie A. Smith, Albert F. and Guinn, Caroline H. 2017. Fourth-grade children's dietary reporting accuracy by meal component: Results from a validation study that manipulated retention interval and prompts. Appetite,
Fismen, Anne-Siri Smith, Otto Robert Frans Torsheim, Torbjørn Rasmussen, Mette Pedersen Pagh, Trine Augustine, Lilly Ojala, Kristiina Samdal, Oddrun and Hashimoto, Kenji 2016. Trends in Food Habits and Their Relation to Socioeconomic Status among Nordic Adolescents 2001/2002-2009/2010. PLOS ONE, Vol. 11, Issue. 2, p. e0148541.
Afshin, Ashkan Penalvo, Jose Del Gobbo, Liana Kashaf, Michael Micha, Renata Morrish, Kurtis Pearson-Stuttard, Jonathan Rehm, Colin Shangguan, Siyi Smith, Jessica D. and Mozaffarian, Dariush 2015. CVD Prevention Through Policy: a Review of Mass Media, Food/Menu Labeling, Taxation/Subsidies, Built Environment, School Procurement, Worksite Wellness, and Marketing Standards to Improve Diet. Current Cardiology Reports, Vol. 17, Issue. 11,
Voráčová, Jaroslava Erik, Sigmund and Sigmundová, Dagmar 2015. Dietary trends among czech school children between 2002-2014: HBSC study. Tělesná kultura, Vol. 38, Issue. 2, p. 83.
He, Chen and Mikkelsen, Bent E 2014. The association between organic school food policy and school food environment: results from an observational study in Danish schools. Perspectives in Public Health, Vol. 134, Issue. 2, p. 110.
Ganann, Rebecca Fitzpatrick-Lewis, Donna Ciliska, Donna and Peirson, Leslea 2012. Community-based interventions for enhancing access to or consumption of fruit and vegetables among five to 18-year olds: a scoping review. BMC Public Health, Vol. 12, Issue. 1,
Krølner, Rikke Suldrup Jørgensen, Thea Aarestrup, Anne Kristine Hjøllund Christiansen, Anne Christensen, Anne Maj and Due, Pernille 2012. The Boost study: design of a school- and community-based randomised trial to promote fruit and vegetable consumption among teenagers. BMC Public Health, Vol. 12, Issue. 1,
Maas, Josje de Ridder, Denise T.D. de Vet, Emely and de Wit, John B.F. 2012. Do distant foods decrease intake? The effect of food accessibility on consumption. Psychology & Health, Vol. 27, Issue. sup2, p. 59.
Olsen, Annemarie Ritz, Christian Kramer, Lisbet and Møller, Per 2012. Serving styles of raw snack vegetables. What do children want?. Appetite, Vol. 59, Issue. 2, p. 556.
Backman, Desiree Gonzaga, Gian Sugerman, Sharon Francis, Dona and Cook, Sara 2011. Effect of Fresh Fruit Availability at Worksites on the Fruit and Vegetable Consumption of Low-Wage Employees. Journal of Nutrition Education and Behavior, Vol. 43, Issue. 4, p. S113.
Delgado-Noguera, Mario Tort, Sera Martínez-Zapata, María José and Bonfill, Xavier 2011. Primary school interventions to promote fruit and vegetable consumption: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Preventive Medicine, Vol. 53, Issue. 1-2, p. 3.
Bere, Elling Hilsen, Marit and Klepp, Knut-Inge 2010. Effect of the nationwide free school fruit scheme in Norway. British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 104, Issue. 04, p. 589.
Francis, Marlon Nichols, Selby SD and Dalrymple, Nequesha 2010. The effects of a school-based intervention programme on dietary intakes and physical activity among primary-school children in Trinidad and Tobago. Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 13, Issue. 05, p. 738.
Nansel, Tonja R Huang, Terry TK Rovner, Alisha J and Sanders-Butler, Yvonne 2010. Association of school performance indicators with implementation of the Healthy Kids, Smart Kids programme: case study. Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 13, Issue. 01, p. 116.
Van Cauwenberghe, Eveline Maes, Lea Spittaels, Heleen van Lenthe, Frank J. Brug, Johannes Oppert, Jean-Michel and De Bourdeaudhuij, Ilse 2010. Effectiveness of school-based interventions in Europe to promote healthy nutrition in children and adolescents: systematic review of published and ‘grey’ literature. British Journal of Nutrition, Vol. 103, Issue. 06, p. 781.
Ashfield-Watt, Pauline AL Stewart, Elizabeth A and Scheffer, Judi A 2009. A pilot study of the effect of providing daily free fruit to primary-school children in Auckland, New Zealand. Public Health Nutrition, Vol. 12, Issue. 05, p. 693.
Jaime, Patricia Constante and Lock, Karen 2009. Do school based food and nutrition policies improve diet and reduce obesity?. Preventive Medicine, Vol. 48, Issue. 1, p. 45.
Kitchen, Meaghan S Ransley, Joan K Greenwood, Darren C Clarke, Graham P Conner, Mark T Jupp, Jennifer and Cade, Janet E 2009. Study protocol: a cluster randomised controlled trial of a school based fruit and vegetable intervention – Project Tomato. BMC Health Services Research, Vol. 9, Issue. 1,
Krølner, Rikke Due, Pernille Rasmussen, Mette Damsgaard, Mogens Trab Holstein, Bjørn E. Klepp, Knut-Inge and Lynch, John 2009. Does school environment affect 11-year-olds' fruit and vegetable intake in Denmark?. Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 68, Issue. 8, p. 1416.
Kwak, Lydia Kremers, Stef P. J. Visscher, Tommy L. S. van Baak, Marleen A. and Brug, Johannes 2009. Behavioral and Cognitive Effects of a Worksite-Based Weight Gain Prevention Program: The NHF-NRG In Balance-Project. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 51, Issue. 12, p. 1437.
To measure the effect of a school fruit and vegetable subscription on children's intake of fruit and vegetables after 5 weeks of intervention.
Seven primary schools in Denmark.
Design and methods: Intervention schools (n = 4) were offered a fruit and vegetable subscription comprising one piece per day. Control schools (n = 3) situated in another municipality were not offered the subscription. Intake of fruit and vegetables was measured at baseline and 5 weeks after the start of the subscription. Two methods were used for dietary assessment: a pre-coded 24-hour recall form including total food intake and a food-frequency questionnaire (FFQ) including only fruit and vegetables.
Children aged 6–10 years (n = 804 from intervention schools and n = 689 from control schools). Response rate in the dietary assessment was 31%.
At intervention schools 45% of the children enrolled in the subscription. After 5 weeks of intervention, both subscribers and non-subscribers had increased their intake of fruit by 0.4 (P = 0.019) and 0.3 (P = 0.008) pieces per school day, respectively, but no change was observed in vegetable intake. Total intake increased only for non-subscribers by 0.4 piece/school day (P = 0.008), mainly due to the consistent increase in fruit intake. No change in intake was measured at control schools. Only the 24-hour recall questionnaire was sensitive enough to pick up the changes of the subscription, whereas the FFQ was not.
Five weeks with the subscription affected both subscribers and non-subscribers to increase intake of fruit. This may indicate that the subscription had an additional effect of stimulating parents of non-subscribers to supply their children with fruit. The results stress the importance of evaluating the effect of this type of programme, and the carefulness needed in designing the evaluation study.
This list contains references from the content that can be linked to their source. For a full set of references and notes please see the PDF or HTML where available.
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.
Full text views reflects the number of PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.
Abstract views reflect the number of visits to the article landing page.
* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 23rd May 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.