Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The effects of bowl size and portion size on food intake and fullness ratings in a sample of Japanese men

  • Misa Shimpo (a1) and Rie Akamatsu (a2)

Abstract

Objective

Portion sizes and bowl sizes may be related to food intake and perceived fullness. The objective of the present study was to investigate the effects of portion size and bowl size and possible interactions between these variables on food intake and fullness in a sample of Japanese men.

Design

Participants ate four different experimental meals across four weeks and completed questionnaires about their fullness using a visual analogue scale administered before and after meals. The four meal patterns included consistent portions of several foods commonly eaten together in typical Japanese meals, along with 150 g of rice served in a small rice bowl (diameter of 11·5 cm), 150 g of rice served in a large rice bowl (diameter of 13·5 cm), 250 g of rice served in a small rice bowl or 250 g of rice served in a large rice bowl.

Setting

Tokyo.

Subject

Twenty-one adult men participated in the study.

Results

Portion size had a significant main effect on rice intake (F(1,20)=83, P<0·001) and fullness (F(1,20)=8·0, P=0·010), but no significant effects of bowl size on the outcome variables were found. The interactions between portion size and bowl size on intake and fullness were not significant.

Conclusions

The sample of Japanese men showed an influence of portion size on food intake. Further research is needed to clarify the combined effects of bowl size and portion size on intake and fullness.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author: Email shimpo.misa@u-nagano.ac.jp

References

Hide All
1. Bickel, WK, Moody, L & Higgins, ST (2016) Some current dimensions of the behavioral economics of health-related behavior change. Prev Med 92, 1623.
2. Thomson, CA & Ravia, J (2011) A systematic review of behavioral interventions to promote intake of fruit and vegetables. J Am Diet Assoc 111, 15231535.
3. Song, HJ, Grutzmacher, S & Munger, AL (2016) Project ReFresh: testing the efficacy of a school-based classroom and cafeteria intervention in elementary school children. J Sch Health 86, 543551.
4. Kahneman, D (2011) Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
5. Hanks, AS, Just, DR, Smith, LE et al. (2012) Healthy convenience: nudging students toward healthier choices in the lunchroom. J Public Health 34, 370376.
6. Wilson, NL, Just, DR, Swigert, J et al. (2017) Food pantry selection solutions: a randomized controlled trial in client-choice food pantries to nudge clients to targeted foods. J Public Health 39, 366372.
7. Olstad, DL, Goonewardene, LA, McCargar, LJ et al. (2014) Choosing healthier foods in recreational sports settings: a mixed methods investigation of the impact of nudging and an economic incentive. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 22, 11, 6.
8. Berkowitz, S, Marquart, L, Mykerezi, E et al. (2016) Reduced-portion entrées in a worksite and restaurant setting: impact on food consumption and waste. Public Health Nutr 19, 30483054.
9. Zlatevska, N, Dubelaar, C & Holden, SS (2014) Sizing up the effect of portion size on consumption: a meta-analytic review. J Mark 78, 140154.
10. Hollands, GJ, Shemilt, I, Marteau, TM et al. (2015) Portion, package or tableware size for changing selection and consumption of food, alcohol and tobacco. Cochrane Database Syst Rev issue 9, CD011045.
11. Rozin, P, Kabnick, K, Pete, E et al. (2003) The ecology of eating: smaller portion sizes in France than in the United States help explain the French paradox. Psychol Sci 14, 450454.
12. Poelman, MP, Eyles, H, Dunford, E et al. (2016) Package size and manufacturer-recommended serving size of sweet beverages: a cross-sectional study across four high-income countries. Public Health Nutr 19, 10081016.
13. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (2010) Guidance of Nutrition Education. http://www.mext.go.jp/a_menu/sports/syokuiku/1292952.htm (accessed February 2018).
14. Wright, B & Bragge, P (2018) Interventions to promote healthy eating choices when dining out: a systematic review of reviews. Br J Health Psychol 23, 278295.
15. Steenhuis, I & Poelman, M (2017) Portion size: latest developments and interventions. Curr Obes Rep 6, 1017.
16. English, L, Lasschuijt, M & Keller, KL (2015) Mechanisms of the portion size effect: what is known and where do we go from here? Appetite 88, 3940.
17. Peter, HC, Herman, C, Polivy, J et al. (2015) Mechanisms underlying the portion-size effect. Physiol Behav 144, 129136.
18. Van Ittersum, K & Wansink, B (2012) Plate size and color suggestibility: the Delboeuf illusion’s bias on serving and eating behavior. J Consum Res 39, 215228.
19. Peng, M (2017) How does plate size affect estimated satiation and intake for individuals in normal-weight and overweight groups? Obes Sci Pract 27, 282288.
20. Ayaz, A, Akyol, A, Cetin, C et al. (2016) Effect of plate size on meal energy intake in normal weight women. Nutr Res Pract 10, 524529.
21. Libotte, E, Siegrist, M & Bucher, T (2014) The influence of plate size on meal composition. Literature review and experiment. Appetite 82, 9196.
22. Robinson, E, Sheen, F, Harrold, J et al. (2016) Dishware size and snack food intake in a between-subjects laboratory experiment. Public Health Nutr 19, 633637.
23. Rolls, BJ, Roe, LS, Halverson, KH et al. (2007) Using a smaller plate did not reduce energy intake at meals. Appetite 49, 652660.
24. Shah, M, Schroeder, R, Winn, W et al. (2011) A pilot study to investigate the effect of plate size on meal energy intake in normal weight and overweight/obese women. J Hum Nutr Diet 24, 612615.
25. Stroebele-Benschop, N, Dieze, A & Hilzendegen, C (2016) First come, first served: does pouring sequence matter for consumption? Appetite 105, 731736.
26. Robinson, E, Nolan, S, Tudur-Smith, C et al. (2014) Will smaller plates lead to smaller waists? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect that experimental manipulation of dishware size has on energy consumption. Obes Rev 15, 812821.
27. Peng, M, Adam, S, Hautus, MJ et al. (2017) See food diet? Cultural differences in estimating fullness and intake as a function of plate size. Appetite 117, 197202.
28. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2017) The National Health and Nutrition Survey in Japan, 2015. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/bunya/kenkou/eiyou/dl/h27-houkoku-01.pdf (accessed February 2018).
29. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (2015) Healthy Meals; Guide of Meals for Preventing Non-communicable Disease and Promoting Health. http://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/04-Houdouhappyou-10904750-Kenkoukyoku-Gantaisakukenkouzoushinka/0000096859.pdf (accessed February 2018).
31. Faul, F, Erdfelder, E, Buchner, A et al. (2009) Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 41, 11491160.
32. Cohen, JA (1992) A power primer. Psychol Bull 112, 155159.
33. Wansink, B, van Ittersum, K & Painter, JE (2006) Ice cream illusions bowls, spoons, and self-served portion size. Am J Prev Med 31, 240243.

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed