Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-cf9d5c678-9z9qw Total loading time: 0.281 Render date: 2021-08-05T07:08:22.316Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

EPIC–Oxford:lifestyle characteristics and nutrient intakes in a cohort of 33 883 meat-eaters and 31 546 non meat-eaters in the UK

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2007

Gwyneth K Davey
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Gibson Building, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK Present address:Unit of Nutrition and Cancer, International Agency for Research on Cancer, 150 cours Albert Thomas, 69372 Lyon Cedex 08, France
Elizabeth A Spencer
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Gibson Building, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK
Paul N Appleby
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Gibson Building, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK
Naomi E Allen
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Gibson Building, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK
Katherine H Knox
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Gibson Building, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK
Timothy J Key
Affiliation:
Cancer Research UK Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford, Gibson Building, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford OX2 6HE, UK
Corresponding
E-mail address:
Rights & Permissions[Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective:

To describe the lifestyle characteristics and nutrient intakes of the Oxford cohort of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC).

Design:

Cohort of men and women recruited through general practices or by post to include a high proportion of non meat-eaters. Dietary, anthropometric and lifestyle data were collected at baseline and four diet groups were defined.

Setting:

United Kingdom.

Participants:

In total, 65 429 men and women aged 20 to 97 years, comprising 33 883 meat-eaters, 10 110 fish-eaters, 18 840 lacto-ovo vegetarians and 2596 vegans.

Results:

Nutrient intakes and lifestyle factors differed across the diet groups, with striking differences between meat-eaters and vegans, and fish-eaters and vegetarians usually having intermediate values. Mean fat intake in each diet group was below the UK dietary reference value of 33% of total energy intake. The mean intake of saturated fatty acids in vegans was approximately 5% of energy, less than half the mean intake among meat-eaters (10–11%). Vegans had the highest intakes of fibre, vitamin B1, folate, vitamin C, vitamin E, magnesium and iron, and the lowest intakes of retinol, vitamin B12, vitamin D, calcium and zinc.

Conclusions:

The EPIC–Oxford cohort includes 31 546 non meat-eaters and is one of the largest studies of vegetarians in the world. The average nutrient intakes in the whole cohort are close to those currently recommended for good health. Comparisons of the diet groups show wide ranges in the intakes of major nutrients such as saturated fat and dietary fibre. Such variation should increase the ability of the study to detect associations of diet with major cancers and causes of death.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © CAB International 2003

References

1Riboli, E. Nutrition and cancer: background and rationale of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC). Ann. Oncol. 1992; 3: 783–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Day, N, Oakes, S, Luben, R, Khaw, K-T, Bingham, S, Welch, A, et al. EPIC–Norfolk: study design and characteristics of the cohort. Br. J. Cancer 1999; 80(Suppl. 1): 95103.Google ScholarPubMed
3Appleby, PN, Thorogood, M, Mann, JI, Key, TJ. The Oxford Vegetarian Study: an overview. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1999; 70(Suppl): 525S–31S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Willett, WC, Sampson, L, Browne, ML, Stampfer, MJ, Rosner, B, Hennekens, CH, et al. The use of a self-administered questionnaire to assess diet four years in the past. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1988; 127: 188–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Bingham, SA, Gill, C, Welch, A, Day, K, Cassidy, A, Khaw, KT, et al. Comparison of dietary assessment methods in nutritional epidemiology: weighed records v. 24 h recalls, food-frequency questionnaires and estimated-diet records. Br. J. Nutr. 1994; 72: 619–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6Bingham, SA, Cassidy, A, Cole, TJ, Welch, A, Runswick, SA, Black, AE, et al. Validation of weighed records and other methods of dietary assessment using the 24 h urine nitrogen technique and other biological markers. Br. J. Nutr. 1995; 73: 531–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7Bingham, SA, Gill, C, Welch, A, Cassidy, A, Runswick, SA, Oakes, S, et al. Validation of dietary assessment methods in the UK arm of EPIC using weighed records, and 24-hour urinary nitrogen and potassium and serum vitamin C and carotenoids as biomarkers. Int. J. Epidemiol. 1997; 26(Suppl. 1): S13751.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food. Food Portion Sizes, 2nd ed. London: HMSO, 1993.Google Scholar
9Holland, B, Welch, AA, Unwin, ID, Buss, DH, Paul, AA, Southgate, DAT. McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 1991.Google Scholar
10Holland, B, Unwin, ID, Buss, DH. Vegetables, Herbs and Spices. Fifth Supplement to McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 1991.Google Scholar
11Holland, B, Unwin, ID, Buss, DH. Fruit and Nuts. First Supplement to McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 1992.Google Scholar
12Holland, B, Welch, AA, Buss, DH. Vegetable Dishes. Second Supplement to McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 1992.Google Scholar
13Holland, B, Brown, J, Buss, DH. Fish and Fish Products. Third Supplement to McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 1993.Google Scholar
14Chan, W, Brown, J, Buss, DH. Miscellaneous Foods. Fourth Supplement to McCance and Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 1994Google Scholar
15Chan, W, Brown, J, Lee, SM, Buss, DH. Meat, Poultry and Game. Fifth Supplement to McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 1995.Google Scholar
16Chan, W, Brown, J, Church, SM, Buss, DH. Meat Products and Dishes. Sixth Supplement to McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 5th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 1996.Google Scholar
17Holland, B, Unwin, ID, Buss, DH. Cereals and Cereal Products. Third Supplement to McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 4th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 1988.Google Scholar
18Holland, B, Unwin, ID, Buss, DH. Milk Products and Eggs. Fourth Supplement to McCance & Widdowson's The Composition of Foods, 4th ed. Cambridge: Royal Society of Chemistry, 1989.Google Scholar
19Key, TJ, Fraser, GE, Thorogood, M, Appleby, PN, Beral, V, Reeves, G, et al. Mortality in vegetarians and non-vegetarians: a collaborative analysis of 8300 deaths among 76 000 men and women in five prospective studies. Public Health Nutr. 1998; 1: 3341.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Greenwood, DC, Cade, JE, Draper, A, Barrett, JH, Calvert, C, Greenhalgh, A. Seven unique food consumption patterns identified among women in the UK Women's Cohort Study. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 2000; 54: 314–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21 Department of Health. Health Survey for England:Trend Data for Adults 1993–1999, Table 9 [online]. Available at www.doh.gov.uk/stats/trends1.htm. Accessed 2 May 2002.Google Scholar
22Department of Health. Prescott-Clarke, P, Primatesta, P, eds. Health Survey for England 1995. Vol. 1. Findings. London: The Stationery Office, 1997.Google Scholar
23Spencer, EA, Appleby, PN, Davey, GK, Key, TJ. Validity of self-reported height and weight in 4808 EPIC–Oxford participants. Public Health Nutr. 2002; 5: 561–65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Spencer, EA, Appleby, PN, Davey, GK, Key, TJ. Diet and body mass index in 38,000 EPIC–Oxford meat-eaters, fish-eaters, vegetarians and vegans. Int. J. Obes. 2002; in pressGoogle Scholar
25Bingham, SA, Welch, AA, McTaggart, A, Mulligan, AA, Runswick, SA, Luben, R, et al. Nutritional methods in the European Prospective Investigation of Cancer in Norfolk. Public Health Nutr. 2001; 4: 847–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26Gregory, J, Foster, K, Tyler, H, Wiseman, H. The Dietary and Nutritional Survey of British Adults. London: HMSO, 1990.Google Scholar
27Department of Health. Dietary Reference Values for Food Energy and Nutrients for the United Kingdom. Report of the Panel on Dietary Reference Values. Report on Health and Social Subjects No 41. London: HMSO, 1991.Google Scholar
28Allen, NE, Appleby, PN, Davey, GK, Key, TJ. Hormones and diet:low insulin-like growth factor-I but normal bioavailable androgens in vegan men. Br. J. Cancer 2000; 83: 95–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Thomas, HV, Davey, GK, Key, TJ. Oestradiol and sex hormone-binding globulin in premenopausal and post-menopausal meat-eaters, vegetarians and vegans. Br. J. Cancer 1999; 80: 1470–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Allen, NE, Appleby, PN, Davey, GK, Key, TJ. Soya milk intake in relation to serum sex hormone levels in British men. Nutr. Cancer 2001; 41: 41–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
31Verkasalo, PK, Appleby, PN, Davey, GK, Key, TJ. Soy milk intake and plasma sex hormones: a cross-sectional study in pre- and postmenopausal women (EPIC–Oxford). Nutr. Cancer 2001; 40: 7986.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32Allen, NE, Appleby, PN, Davey, GK, Kaaks, R, Rinaldi, S, Key, TJ. Circulating total and bioavailable insulin-like growth factor-I is lower among vegan women compared with vegetarians and meat-eaters. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2002; 11: 1441–8.Google Scholar
33Key, TJ, Appleby, PN, Davey, GK, Allen, NE, Spencer, EA, Travis, RC. Mortality in British vegetarians:review and preliminary results from EPIC–Oxford. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2002; in press.Google Scholar
You have Access
299
Cited by

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

EPIC–Oxford:lifestyle characteristics and nutrient intakes in a cohort of 33 883 meat-eaters and 31 546 non meat-eaters in the UK
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

EPIC–Oxford:lifestyle characteristics and nutrient intakes in a cohort of 33 883 meat-eaters and 31 546 non meat-eaters in the UK
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

EPIC–Oxford:lifestyle characteristics and nutrient intakes in a cohort of 33 883 meat-eaters and 31 546 non meat-eaters in the UK
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *