Skip to main content
×
×
Home

Evaluating the ≤10:1 wholegrain criterion in identifying nutrient quality and health implications of UK breads and breakfast cereals

  • Bahar Ghodsian (a1) (a2) and Angela M Madden (a1)
Abstract
Abstract Objective

To evaluate the nutrient quality of breads and breakfast cereals identified using the wholegrain definition of ≤10:1 carbohydrate:fibre ratio.

Design

Following a cross-sectional study design, nutritional information was systematically gathered from food labels of breads and breakfast cereals that met the ≤10:1 carbohydrate:fibre criterion. The median nutrient content was compared with the UK Food Standards Agency’s nutrient profiling standards and the associations between carbohydrate:fibre ratio and other nutrients were analysed. Subgroup analyses were undertaken for products with and without fruit, nuts and/or seeds.

Setting

Products from four major supermarket stores in the UK.

Subjects

Breads (n 162) and breakfast cereals (n 266).

Results

Breads which met the ≤10:1 criterion typically contained medium fat, low saturated fat, low sugar and medium Na. Breakfast cereals typically contained medium fat, low saturated fat, high sugar and low Na. In both groups, as the carbohydrate:fibre ratio decreased, fat content increased (bread: P=0·029, r=−0·171; breakfast cereal: P=0·033, r=−0·131) and, in breakfast cereals, as the ratio increased, sugar content increased (P<0·0005, r=0·381). Breakfast cereals with fruit, nuts and/or seeds contained, per 100 g, more energy (P=0·002), fat, saturated fat and sugar (all P<0·0005), while seeded breads had more energy, fat and saturated fat (all P<0·0005).

Conclusions

Overall, breads and breakfast cereals meeting the ≤10:1 criterion have good nutritional quality, suggesting that the criterion could be useful in public health and/or food labelling. The utility of applying the ≤10:1 criterion to products containing fruit, nuts and/or seeds is less clear and requires further research.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Evaluating the ≤10:1 wholegrain criterion in identifying nutrient quality and health implications of UK breads and breakfast cereals
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Evaluating the ≤10:1 wholegrain criterion in identifying nutrient quality and health implications of UK breads and breakfast cereals
      Available formats
      ×
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Evaluating the ≤10:1 wholegrain criterion in identifying nutrient quality and health implications of UK breads and breakfast cereals
      Available formats
      ×
Copyright
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: Email a.madden@herts.ac.uk
References
Hide All
1. Institute of Grocery Delivery (2008) UK Whole Grain Guidance. Watford: IGD.
2. Jonnalagadda SS, Harnack L, Liu RH et al. (2011) Putting the whole grain puzzle together: health benefits associated with whole grains – summary of American Society for Nutrition 2010 Satellite Symposium. J Nutr 141, issue 5, 1011S1022S.
3. Mozaffarian D, Appel LJ & Van Horn L (2011) Components of a cardioprotective diet: new insights. Circulation 123, 2970–2891.
4. Bao W, Tobias DK, Hu FB et al. (2016) Pre-pregnancy potato consumption and risk of gestational diabetes mellitus: prospective cohort study. BMJ 352, 6898.
5. Farvid MS, Eliassen AH, Cho E et al. (2016) Dietary fiber intake in young adults and breast cancer risk. Pediatrics 137, e20151226.
6. Helnæs A, Kyrø C, Andersen I et al. (2016) Intake of whole grains is associated with lower risk of myocardial infarction: the Danish Diet, Cancer and Health Cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 103, 9991007.
7. Ludwig DDS (2002) The glycaemic index – physiological mechanisms relating to obesity, diabetes and cardiovascular disease. JAMA 297, 24142423.
8. Slavin J (2004) Whole grains and human health. Nutr Res Rev 17, 99110.
9. Venn BJ & Mann JI (2004) Cereal grains, legumes and diabetes. Eur J Clin Nutr 58, 14431461.
10. Schroeder N, Gallaher DD, Arndt EA et al. (2009) Influence of whole grain barley, whole grain wheat, and refined rice-based foods on short term satiety and energy intake. Appetite 53, 363369.
11. Giacco R, Clemente G, Cipriano D et al. (2010) Effects of the regular consumption of wholemeal wheat foods on cardiovascular risk factors in healthy people. Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis 20, 186194.
12. Ferruzzi MG, Jonnalagadda SS, Liu S et al. (2014) Developing a standard definition of whole-grain foods for dietary recommendations: a summary report of a multidisciplinary expert roundtable discussion. Adv Nutr 5, 164176.
13. Fontanarosa PB, Flanagin A & DeAngelis CD (2005) Reporting conflicts of interest, financial aspects of research and role of sponsors in funded studies. JAMA 294, 110111.
14. Public Health England (2016) The Eatwell Guide. Helping You Eat a Healthy Balanced Diet. London: Public Health England.
15. World Health Organization (2017) Global Strategy on Diet, Physical Activity and Health. http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/diet/en/ (accessed August 2017).
17. Mann KD, Pearce MS, McKevith B et al. (2015) Low whole grain intake in the UK: results from the National Diet and Nutrition Survey rolling programme 2008–11. Br J Nutr 113, 16431651.
18. Public Health England (2014) Adult Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes. London: Public Health England.
19. Wu H, Flint AJ, Qi Q et al. (2015) Association between dietary whole grain intake and risk of mortality: two large prospective studies in US men and women. JAMA Intern Med 175, 373384.
20. European Food Safety Authority (2010) Scientific opinion on the substantiation of health claims related to whole grain. EFSA J 8, 17661782.
21. Wholegrains Council (2016) Whole Grain Stamp. http://www.wholegrainscouncil.org/whole-grain-stamp (accessed August 2017).
22. Gilmore AB, Savell E & Collin J (2011) Public health, corporations and the new responsibility deal: promoting partnerships with vectors of disease? J Public Health 33, 24.
23. Mozaffarian RS, Lee RM, Kennedy MA et al. (2013) Identifying whole grain foods: a comparison of different approaches for selecting more healthful whole grain products. Public Health Nutr 16, 22552264.
24. Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (2015) Carbohydrates and Health Report. London: Public Health England.
25. Serra-Majem L & Bautista-Castaño L (2015) Relationship between bread and obesity. Br J Nutr 113, Suppl. 2, S29S35.
26. Lloyd-Jones DM, Hong Y, Labarthe D et al. (2010) Defining and setting national goals for cardiovascular health promotion and disease reduction: the American Heart Association’s Strategic Impact Goal through 2020 and beyond. Circulation 121, 586613.
27. Public Health England & Food Standards Agency (2014) National Diet and Nutrition Survey, Results from Years 1, 2, 3 and 4 (combined) of the Rolling Programme (2008/9–2011/12). London: Public Health England.
28. MINTEL (2014) Food and Drink Retailing – UK. London: Mintel Group Limited.
29. Food Standards Agency (2007) Food. Using Traffic Lights to Make Healthier Choices. London: FSA.
30. Grimes CA, Wright JD, Liu K et al. (2013) Dietary sodium intake is associated with total fluid and sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in US children and adolescents aged 2–18 y: NHANES 2005–2008. Am J Clin Nutr 98, 189196.
31. Finglas PM, Roe MA, Pinchen HM et al. (2015) McCance and Widdowson’s The Composition of Foods: Summary Edition, 7th ed. London: Royal Society of Chemistry.
32. Food Standards Agency (1994) Food Portion Sizes, 3rd ed. London: The Stationery Office.
33. Lobstein T & Davies S (2009) Defining and labelling ‘healthy’ and ‘unhealthy’ food. Public Health Nutr 12, 331340.
34. van Dooren C & Kramer G (2012) Food Patterns and Dietary Recommendations in Spain, France and Sweden. Gouda: Blonk Milieu Advies.
35. Vafeiadou K, Weech M, Altowaijri H et al. (2015) Replacement of saturated with unsaturated fats had no impact on vascular function but beneficial effects on lipid biomarkers, E-selectin and blood pressure: results from the randomized, controlled Dietary Intervention and VAScular function (DIVAS) study. Am J Clin Nutr 102, 4048.
36. Brinsden HC, He FJ, Jenner KH et al. (2013) Surveys of salt content in UK bread: progress made and further reductions possible. BMJ Open 3, e002936.
37. Mhurchu CN, Capelin C, Dunford EK et al. (2011) Sodium content of processed foods in the United Kingdom: analysis of 44,000 foods purchased by 21,000 households. Am J Clin Nutr 93, 594600.
38. Karlsen M, Ellmore GS & McKeown N (2016) Seeds – health benefits, barriers to incorporation, and strategies for practitioners in supporting consumption among consumers. Nutr Today 51, 5059.
39. McKee LH & Latner TA (2000) Underutilized sources of dietary fiber: a review. Plant Foods Hum Nutr 55, 285304.
40. Anderson JW, Baird P, Davis RH Jr et al. (2009) Health benefits of dietary fiber. Nutr Rev 67, 188205.
41. Truswell AS (2002) Cereal grains and coronary heart disease. Eur J Clin Nutr 56, 114.
42. Dewettinck K, Van Bockstaele F, Kuhne B et al. (2008) Nutritional value of bread: influence of processing, food interaction and consumer perception. J Cereal Sci 48, 243257.
43. Williams P (2014) The benefits of breakfast cereal consumption: a systematic review of the evidence base. Adv Nutr 5, issue 5, 636S673S.
44. Martinez-Gonzalez MA, Salas-Salvado J, Estruch R et al. (2016) Benefits of the Mediterranean diet: Insights from the PREDIMED study. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 58, 5060.
45. Ruxton CHS & Kirk TR (1997) Breakfast: a review of associations with measures of dietary intake, physiology and biochemistry. Br J Nutr 78, 199213.
46. Lustig RH, Schmidt LA & Brindis CD (2012) Public health: the toxic truth about sugar. Nature 482, 2729.
47. McKeown NM, Yoshida M, Shea M et al. (2009) Whole-grain intake and cereal fiber are associated with lower abdominal adiposity in older adults. J Nutr 139, 1951955.
48. Liu RH (2003) Health benefits of fruit and vegetables are from additive and synergistic combinations of phytochemicals. Am J Clin Nutr 78, 3 Suppl., 517S520S.
49. Phillips KM, Ruggio DM & Ashraf-Khorassani M (2005) Phytosterol composition of nuts and seeds commonly consumed in the United States. J Agric Food Chem 53, 94369445.
50. Gani A, Wani SM, Masoodi FA et al. (2012) Whole-grain cereal bioactive compounds and their health benefits: a review. J Food Process Technol 3, 146156.
51. The Dairy Council (2016) Milk Factsheet. London: The Dairy Council.
52. Schaafsma G (2008) Lactose and lactose derivatives as bioactive ingredients in human nutrition. Int Dairy J 18, 465468.
53. Change4Life (2015) Let’s Get Sugar Smart! http://www.nhs.uk/change4life-beta/campaigns/sugar-smart/home (accessed August 2017).
54. Scarborough P, Matthews A, Eyles H et al. (2015) Reds are more important than greens: how UK supermarket shoppers use the different information on a traffic light nutrition label in a choice experiment. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 12, 151160.
55. Jacobs DR, Tapsell LC & Temple NJ (2011) Food synergy: the key to balancing the nutrition research effort. Public Health Rev 33, 507529.
56. de Munter JSL, Hu FB, Spiegelman D et al. (2007) Whole grain, bran, and germ intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study and systematic review. PLoS Med 4, 261.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords:

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 53
Total number of PDF views: 46 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 226 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 26th December 2017 - 19th January 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.