Skip to main content

Fast-food menu offerings vary in dietary quality, but are consistently poor

  • Sharon I Kirkpatrick (a1), Jill Reedy (a1), Lisa L Kahle (a2), Jennifer L Harris (a3), Punam Ohri-Vachaspati (a4) and Susan M Krebs-Smith (a1)...
Abstract Objective

To evaluate five popular fast-food chains’ menus in relation to dietary guidance.


Menus posted on chains’ websites were coded using the Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Studies and MyPyramid Equivalents Database to enable Healthy Eating Index-2005 (HEI-2005) scores to be assigned. Dollar or value and kids’ menus and sets of items promoted as healthy or nutritious were also assessed.


Five popular fast-food chains in the USA.


Not applicable.


Full menus scored lower than 50 out of 100 possible points on the HEI-2005. Scores for Total Fruit, Whole Grains and Sodium were particularly dismal. Compared with full menus, scores on dollar or value menus were 3 points higher on average, whereas kids’ menus scored 10 points higher on average. Three chains marketed subsets of items as healthy or nutritious; these scored 17 points higher on average compared with the full menus. No menu or subset of menu items received a score higher than 72 out of 100 points.


The poor quality of fast-food menus is a concern in light of increasing away-from-home eating, aggressive marketing to children and minorities, and the tendency for fast-food restaurants to be located in low-income and minority areas. The addition of fruits, vegetables and legumes; replacement of refined with whole grains; and reformulation of offerings high in sodium, solid fats and added sugars are potential strategies to improve fast-food offerings. The HEI may be a useful metric for ongoing monitoring of fast-food menus.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Fast-food menu offerings vary in dietary quality, but are consistently poor
      Available formats
      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Fast-food menu offerings vary in dietary quality, but are consistently poor
      Available formats
      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Fast-food menu offerings vary in dietary quality, but are consistently poor
      Available formats
Corresponding author
*Corresponding author: Email
Hide All
1. Krebs-Smith SM, Guenther PM, Subar AF et al. (2010) Americans do not meet federal dietary recommendations. J Nutr 140, 18321838.
2. Kirkpatrick SI, Dodd KW, Reedy J et al. (2012) Income and race/ethnicity are associated with adherence to food-based dietary guidance among US adults and children. J Acad Nutr Diet 112, 624635.
3. Kumanyika SK & Krebs-Smith SM (2000) Preventive nutrition issues in ethnic and socioeconomic groups in the United States. In Primary and Secondary Preventive Nutrition, pp. 325–356 [A Bendich and RJ Deckelbaum, editors]. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc.
4. Bowman SA & Vinyard BT (2004) Fast-food consumption of US adults: impact on energy and nutrient intakes and overweight status. J Am Coll Nutr 23, 163168.
5. Bowman SA, Gortmaker SL, Ebbeling CB et al. (2004) Effects of fast-food consumption on energy intake and diet quality among children in a national household survey. Pediatrics 113, 112118.
6. Sebastian RS, Wilkinson Enns C & Goldman JD (2009) US adolescents and MyPyramid: associations between fast-food consumption and lower likelihood of meeting recommendations. J Am Diet Assoc 109, 226235.
7. French SA, Harnack L & Jeffery RW (2000) Fast-food restaurant use among women in the Pound of Prevention study: dietary, behavioral and demographic correlates. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 24, 13531359.
8. Powell LM, Nguyen BT & Han E (2012) Energy intake from restaurants: demographics and socioeconomics, 2003–2008. Am J Prev Med 43, 498504.
9. Duffey KJ, Gordon-Larsen P, Jacobs DR Jr et al. (2007) Differential associations of fast-food and restaurant food consumption with 3-y change in body mass index: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults Study. Am J Clin Nutr 85, 201208.
10. Duffey KJ, Gordon-Larsen P, Steffen LM et al. (2009) Regular consumption from fast-food establishments relative to other restaurants is differentially associated with metabolic outcomes in young adults. J Nutr 139, 21132118.
11. Pereira MA, Kartashov AI, Ebbeling CB et al. (2005) Fast-food habits, weight gain, and insulin resistance (the CARDIA study): 15-year prospective analysis. Lancet 365, 3642.
12. Harris JL, Schwartz MB & Brownell KD (2010) Fast-food F.A.C.T.S.: Evaluating Fast-food Nutrition and Marketing to Youth. (accessed July 2012).
13. Wu HW & Sturm R (2012) What's on the menu? A review of the energy and nutritional content of US chain restaurant menus. Public Health Nutr (Epublication ahead of print version).
14. Guenther PM, Reedy J & Krebs-Smith SM (2008) Development of the Healthy Eating Index-2005. J Am Diet Assoc 108, 18961901.
15. US Department of Health and Human Services & US Department of Agriculture (2005) Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2005, 5th edition. (accessed July 2012).
16. Britten P, Marcoe K, Yamini S et al. (2006) Development of food intake patterns for the MyPyramid Food Guidance System. J Nutr Educ Behav 38, Suppl. 6, S78S92.
17. Krebs-Smith SM, Reedy J & Bosire C (2010) Healthfulness of the US food supply: little improvement despite decades of dietary guidance. Am J Prev Med 38, 472477.
18. Reedy J, Krebs-Smith SM & Bosire C (2010) Evaluating the food environment: application of the Healthy Eating Index-2005. Am J Prev Med 38, 465471.
19. Bowman SA, Friday JE & Moshfegh A (2008) MyPyramid Equivalents Database 2.0 for USDA Survey Food Codes, 2003–2004. (accessed July 2012).
20. Center for Nutrition Policy and Promotion (2012) MyPyramid Equivalent Database for Whole Fruit and Fruit Juice. (accessed July 2012).
21. Agricultural Research Service, Food Surveys Research Group (2006) USDA Food and Nutrient Database for Dietary Surveys, 2.0. (accessed July 2012).
22. Powell LM, Szczypka G & Chaloupka FJ (2010) Trends in exposure to television food advertisements among children and adolescents in the United States. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 164, 794802.
23. Larson NI, Story MT & Nelson MC (2009) Neighborhood environments: disparities in access to healthy foods in the US. Am J Prev Med 36, 7481.
24. McDonald's (2012) Changing Together. (accessed July 2012).
25. Mcdonald's (2012) Commitments to Offer Improved Nutrition Choices. (accessed September 2012).
26. National Restaurant Association (2012) Kids LiveWell. (accessed July 2012).
27. National Restaurant Association (2012) Kids LiveWell Participation Triples. (accessed July 2012).
28. Urban LE, McCrory MA, Dallal GE et al. (2011) Accuracy of stated energy contents of restaurant foods. JAMA 306, 287293.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *



Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 92
Total number of PDF views: 447 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 655 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 20th November 2017. This data will be updated every 24 hours.