Skip to main content
×
×
Home

A label survey to identify ingredients potentially containing GM organisms to estimate intake exposure in Brazil

  • Rayza Dal Molin Cortese (a1) (a2), Suellen Secchi Martinelli (a1) (a2) (a3), Rafaela Karen Fabri (a1) (a2), Rossana Pacheco da Costa Proença (a1) (a2) and Suzi Barletto Cavalli (a1) (a2) (a3)...
Abstract
Objective

To identify ingredients from products and by-products derived from GM crops in packaged food products and to analyse the presence of these ingredients in the foods most commonly consumed by the Brazilian population.

Design

Cross-sectional study.

Setting

A search of the scientific literature to identify the use of products and by-products derived from GM crops in foods in Brazil and a study of food labels in a supermarket belonging to one of the ten largest supermarket chains in Brazil.

Subjects

To identify the ingredients present in packaged food products and their nomenclatures, the labels of all packaged food products available for sale in a supermarket were analysed. Subsequently, the presence of potential GM ingredients in the foods most commonly consumed by the Brazilian population was analysed.

Results

A total of twenty-eight GM crops’ by-products with applications in the food industry (from soyabeans, corn, cotton and a yeast) were identified. Such by-products are presented as food ingredients or additives on food labels with 101 distinct nomenclatures. Most of the variety (63·8 %) and the quantity (64·5 %) of the foods most commonly consumed by Brazilians may contain a least one GM ingredient.

Conclusions

The presence of at least one potential GM ingredient was observed in more than half of the variety of foods most commonly consumed by the Brazilian population. Such ingredients were identified with distinct nomenclatures and incomplete descriptions, which may make it difficult to identify potential GM foods and confuse consumers when making food choices.

Copyright
Corresponding author
* Corresponding author: Email rayzacortese@gmail.com
References
Hide All
1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations & World Health Organization (2000) Safety Aspects of Genetically Modified Foods of Plant Origin, p. 37. Geneva: FAO/WHO.
2. Brasil (2005) Lei no. 11.105, de 24 de março de 2005 – Regulamenta os incisos II, IV e V do § 1º do art. 225 da Constituição Federal, estabelece normas de segurança e mecanismos de fiscalização de atividades que envolvam organismos geneticamente modificados. Brasília, DF: Diario Oficial da Uniao.
3. Nodari, RO & Guerra, MP (2003) Transgenic plants and their products: effects, risks and food safety. Rev Nutr 16, 105116.
4. James, C (2015) Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops. ISAAA Brief no. 51. Ithaca, NY: International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications.
5. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development & Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2015) OECD–FAO Agricultural Outlook 2015. Paris: OECD Publishing.
6. Price, B & Cotter, J (2014) The GM Contamination Register: a review of recorded contamination incidents associated with genetically modified organisms (GMOs), 1997–2013. Int J Food Contam 1, 5.
7. Comissão Técnica Nacional de Biossegurança, Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (2017) Global Listing of GMO Commercial Plants. http://ctnbio.mcti.gov.br/documents/566529/1684467/Tabela+de+Plantas+Aprovadas+para+Comercializa%C3%A7%C3%A3o/e3087f9c-c719-476e-a9bd-bfe75def842f (accessed May 2018).
8. Drewnowski, A (2003) Fat and sugar: an economic analysis. J Nutr 133, issue 3, 838S840S.
9. Singh, P, Kumar, R, Sabapathy, SN et al. (2008) Functional and edible uses of soy protein products. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 7, 1428.
10. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2014) Steady Increase in Incidents of Low Levels of GM Crops in Traded Food and Feed. Rome: FAO.
11. Brod, FCA & Arisi, ACM (2007) Recombinant DNA in meat additives: specific detection of Roundup Ready™ soybean by nested PCR. J Sci Food Agric 87, 19801984.
12. Dinon, AZ, de Melo, JE & Arisi, ACM (2008) Monitoring of MON810 genetically modified maize in foods in Brazil from 2005 to 2007. J Food Compost Anal 21, 515518.
13. Greiner, R & Konietzny, U (2008) Presence of genetically modified maize and soy in food products sold commercially in Brazil from 2000 to 2005. Food Control 19, 499505.
14. Dinon, AZ, Treml, D, de Mello, CS et al. (2010) Monitoring of GMO in Brazilian processed meat and soy-based products from 2007 to 2008. J Food Compost Anal 23, 226229.
15. Landrigan, PJ & Benbrook, C (2015) GMOs, herbicides, and public health. N Engl J Med 373, 693695.
16. de Vendomois, JS, Roullier, F, Cellier, D et al. (2009) A comparison of the effects of three GM corn varieties on mammalian health. Int J Biol Sci 5, 706726.
17. Magana-Gomez, JA & de la Barca, AM (2009) Risk assessment of genetically modified crops for nutrition and health. Nutr Rev 67, 116.
18. Seralini, G-E, Clair, E, Mesnage, R et al. (2014) Republished study: long-term toxicity of a Roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Environ Sci Eur 26, 14.
19. Carman, JA, Vlieger, HR, Steeg, LJV et al. (2013) A long-term toxicology study on pigs fed a combined genetically modified (GM) soy and GM maize diet. J Org Syst 8, 3854.
20. Ibrahim, MA & Okasha, EF (2016) Effect of genetically modified corn on the jejunal mucosa of adult male albino rat. Exp Toxicol Pathol 68, 579588.
21. Shao, Q & Chin, KV (2011) Survey of American food trends and the growing obesity epidemic. Nutr Res Pract 5, 253259.
22. Samsel, A & Seneff, S (2013) Glyphosate, pathways to modern diseases II: celiac sprue and gluten intolerance. Interdiscip Toxicol 6, 159184.
23. Samsel, A & Seneff, S (2013) Glyphosate’s suppression of cytochrome P450 enzymes and amino acid biosynthesis by the gut microbiome: pathways to modern diseases. Entropy 15, 14161463.
24. Thongprakaisang, S, Thiantanawat, A, Rangkadilok, N et al. (2013) Glyphosate induces human breast cancer cells growth via estrogen receptors. Food Chem Toxicol 59, 129136.
25. Swanson, NL, Leu, A, Abrahamson, J et al. (2014) Genetically engineered crops, glyphosate and the deterioration of health in the United States of America. J Organic Sys 9, 637.
26. Weintraub, K (2011) The prevalence puzzle: autism counts. Nature 479, 2224.
27. Antoniou, M, Habib, MEM, Howard, CV et al. (2012) Teratogenic effects of glyphosate-based herbicides: divergence of regulatory decisions from scientific evidence. J Environ Anal Toxicol S4, 6.
28. Kim, KH, Kabir, E & Jahan, SA (2017) Exposure to pesticides and the associated human health effects. Sci Total Environ 575, 525535.
29. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2000) Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety to the Convention on Biological Diversity. Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
30. Brasil (1988) Constituicao da Republica Federativa do Brasil. Brasília, DF: Supremo Tribunal Federal.
31. Brasil (1990) Lei no. 8.078, de 11 de setembro de 1990 – Dispõe sobre a proteção do consumidor e dá outras providências. Brasília, DF: Diario Oficial da Uniao.
32. Brasil (2003) Decreto Federal no. 4.680 de 24 de abril de 2003 – Regulamenta o direito à informação, assegurado pela Lei no. 8.078, de 11 de setembro de 1990, quanto aos alimentos e ingredientes alimentares destinados ao consumo humano ou animal que contenham ou sejam produzidos a partir de organismos geneticamente modificados. Brasília, DF: Diario Oficial da Uniao.
33. Ministério da Justiça (2003) Portaria no. 2.658, de 22 de dezembro de 2003. Define o símbolo de que trata o art. 2º, § 1º, do Decreto no. 4.680, de 24 de abril de 2003, na forma do anexo à presente portaria. Brasília, DF: Diario Oficial da Uniao.
34. Branquinho, MR, Ferreira, RTB & Cardarelli-Leite, P (2010) Survey of compliance with labeling legislation in food containing GMOs in Brazil. J Food Compost Anal 23, 220225.
35. Brasil, Ministerio da Saude, Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria (2002) Resoluçao da Diretoria Colegiada – RDC no. 259, de 20 de dezembro de 2002: aprova regulamento técnico para rotulagem de alimentos embalados. Brasília, DF: Diario Oficial [da] Republica Federativa do Brasil, Poder Executivo.
36. Legault, L, Brandt, MB, Mccabe, N et al. (2004) 2000-2001 food label and package survey: an update on prevalence of nutrition labeling and claims on processed, packaged foods. J Am Diet Assoc 104, 952958.
37. Williams, P, Yeatman, H, Zakrzewski, S et al. (2003) Nutrition and related claims used on packaged Australian foods – implications for regulation. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr 12, 138150.
38. Ten, JA, Olalla, MC & Torres, AH (2007) A review of nutrition and health claims in food. Rev Esp Nutr Comunitaria 13, 163175.
39. Söyler, G & El, SN (2009) Investigation on Turkish consumers regarding their attitudes towards grammatical styles, knowledge and compliance of nutrition messages. Nutr Food Sci 39, 520533.
40. Lalor, F, Kennedy, J, Flynn, MAT et al. (2009) A study of nutrition and health claims – a snapshot of what’s on the Irish market. Public Health Nutr 13, 704711.
41. Kaur, A, Scarborough, P, Matthews, A et al. (2016) How many foods in the UK carry health and nutrition claims, and are they healthier than those that do not? Public Health Nutr 19, 988997.
42. Feinerer, I & Hornik, K (2017) tm: Text Mining Package. R package version 0.7-2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=tm (accessed April 2017).
43. Feinerer, I, Hornik, K & Meyer, D (2008) Text mining infrastructure in R. J Stat Softw 25, 154; available at http://www.jstatsoft.org/v25/i05/
44. R Core Team (2017) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/ (accessed April 2017).
45. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (2011) Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2008–2009: Analise do Consumo Alimentar Pessoal no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro, RJ: IBGE.
46. Jobling, S (2004) Improving starch for food and industrial applications. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7, 210218.
47. Sun, Q, Dai, L, Nan, C et al. (2014) Effect of heat moisture treatment on physicochemical and morphological properties of wheat starch and xylitol mixture. Food Chem 143, 5459.
48. Goldfein, KR & Slavin, JL (2015) Why sugar is added to food: Food Science 101. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 14, 644656.
49. European Food Information Council (2013) Sugars from a Food Technology Perspective. http://www.eufic.org/en/whats-in-food/article/sugars-from-a-food-technology-perspective (accessed November 2016).
50. Liu, TY, Ma, Y, Yu, SF et al. (2011) The effect of ball milling treatment on structure and porosity of maize starch granule. Innov Food Sci Emerg Technol 12, 586593.
51. Yamada, EA, Alvim, ID, Santucci, MCC et al. (2003) Centesimal composition and protein nutritive value of yeast from ethanol fermentation and of yeast derivatives. Rev Nutr 16, 423432.
52. Mardegan, SF, Andrade, TMB, de Sousa Neto, ER et al. (2013) Stable carbon isotopic composition of Brazilian beers – a comparison between large- and small-scale breweries. J Food Compost Anal 29, 5257.
53. Brasil (2009) Decreto no. 6.871, de 4 de junho de 2009. Regulamenta a Lei no. 8918, de 14 de julho de 1994, que dispõe sobre a padronização, a classificação, o registro, a inspeção, a produção e a fiscalização de bebidas. Brasília, DF: Diario Oficial da Uniao.
54. Council for Biotechnology Information (2017) DNA à mesa? https://cib.org.br/dna-a-mesa/ (accessed May 2018).
55. Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Committee (2002) Improving the Regulation of Genetically Modified Foods and Other Novel Foods in Canada: Report to the Government of Canada Biotechnology Ministerial Coordinating Committee. http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/C2-589-2001E.pdf (accessed July 2016).
56. McDuffie, HH, Pahwa, P, McLaughlin, JR et al. (2001) Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and specific pesticide exposures in men: cross-Canada study of pesticides and health. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10, 11551163.
57. Waissmann, W (2002) Health surveillance and endocrine disruptors. Cad Saude Publica 18, 511517.
58. Oliveira, NP, Moi, GP, Atanaka-Santos, M et al. (2014) Congenital defects in the cities with high use of pesticides in the state of Mato Grosso, Brazil. Cienc Saude Colet 19, 41234130.
59. Meyer, A, Sarcinelli, PN & Moreira, JC (1999) Are some Brazilian population groups subject to endocrine disrupters? Cad Saude Publica 15, 845850.
60. Levy-Costa, RB, Sichieri, R, Pontes Ndos, S et al. (2005) Household food availability in Brazil: distribution and trends (1974–2003). Rev Saude Publica 39, 530540.
61. Brasil, Ministerio da Saude (2014) Feeding Guide for the Brazilian Population: Promoting the Health Food. Brasília, DF: Ministerio da Saude.
62. Aumaitre, A, Aulrich, K, Chesson, A et al. (2002) New feeds from genetically modified plants: substantial equivalence, nutritional equivalence, digestibility, and safety for animals and the food chain. Livest Sci 74, 223238.
63. Companhia Nacional de Abastecimento (2017) Séries históricas de área plantada, produtividade e produção, relativas às Safras 2016/2017 de algodão, milho e soja. http://www.conab.gov.br/conteudos.php?a=1252&t= (accessed March 2018).
64. Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento (2017) AGROSTAT – Estatísticas de Comércio Exterior do Agronegócio Brasileiro. http://indicadores.agricultura.gov.br/agrostat/index.htm (accessed March 2018).
65. Brasil, Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria (1978) Resolução CNNPA no. 14, de 28 de junho de 1978. Brasília, DF: Diário Oficial da União.
66. Brasil, Agencia Nacional de Vigilancia Sanitaria (1978) Resolução CNNPA no. 12, de 24 de julho de 1978. Brasília, DF: Diário Oficial da União.
67. Slavin, J (1991) Nutritional benefits of soy protein and soy fiber. J Am Diet Assoc 91, 816819.
68. Slavin, JL & Greenberg, NA (2003) Partially hydrolyzed guar gum: clinical nutrition uses. Nutrition 19, 549552.
69. Sánchez, VE, Bartholomai, GB & Pilosof, AMR (1995) Rheological properties of food gums as related to their water binding capacity and to soy protein interaction. J Sci Food Agric 28, 380385.
70. Rosell, CM, Rojas, JA & Benedito de Barber, C (2001) Influence of hydrocolloids on dough rheology and bread quality. Food Hydrocoll 15, 7581.
71. Hua, Y, Cui, SW & Wang, Q (2003) Gelling property of soy protein–gum mixtures. Food Hydrocoll 17, 889894.
72. Van Nieuwenhuyzen, W (1981) The industrial uses of special lecithins: a review. J. Am Oil Chem Soc 58, 886888.
73. Wassell, P & Young, NWG (2007) Food applications of trans fatty acid substitutes. Int J Food Sci Technol 42, 503517.
74. Ornelas, LH (2007) Técnica Dietética: Seleção e Preparo dos Alimentos, 8th ed., p. 276. São Paulo, SP: Atheneu.
75. Belloque, J, Garcia, MC, Torre, M et al. (2002) Analysis of soyabean proteins in meat products: a review. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 42, 507532.
76. Li, X, Li, G, Li, J et al. (2016) Producing petrochemicals from catalytic fast pyrolysis of corn fermentation residual by-products generated from citric acid production. Renew Energy 89, 331338.
77. Max, B, Salgado, JM, Rodríguez, N et al. (2010) Biotechnological production of citric acid. Braz J Microbiol 41, 862875.
78. Pyeshkova, VM, Saiapina, OY, Soldatkin, OO et al. (2009) Enzyme conductometric biosensor for maltose determination. Biopolym Cell 25, 4.
79. Soldatkin, OO, Peshkova, VM, Saiapina, OY et al. (2013) Development of conductometric biosensor array for simultaneous determination of maltose, lactose, sucrose and glucose. Talanta 115, 200207.
80. Descamps, N, Palzer, S, Roos, YH et al. (2013) Glass transition and flowability/caking behaviour of maltodextrin DE 21. J Food Eng 119, 809813.
81. Pérez, A, Meléndez, I, Vera, I et al. (2015) Thermal and tensile properties of corn semolina–protein blends in the glassy state. J Food Eng 165, 93103.
82. Struck, S, Jaros, D, Brennan, CS et al. (2014) Sugar replacement in sweetened bakery goods. Int J Food Sci Technol 49, 19631976.
Recommend this journal

Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.

Public Health Nutrition
  • ISSN: 1368-9800
  • EISSN: 1475-2727
  • URL: /core/journals/public-health-nutrition
Please enter your name
Please enter a valid email address
Who would you like to send this to? *
×

Keywords

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 5
Total number of PDF views: 38 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 307 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between 4th July 2018 - 23rd July 2018. This data will be updated every 24 hours.